High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWP(C) Nos. 12381/2010 and 14091/2010 were dismi...

SARASAN, R., AJITHKUMAR K.K., NASAR METHAR M.K., INDUKALADHARAN NAIR, SATHEESH KUMAR, BINU ABRAHAM v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM; DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM; ADDL. RESPONDENTS (3 TO 28) AND ADDL.R29 SMT.CICILIKUTTY JOHN

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No. 4599/2010

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Antony Dominic
Judgment Date
2010-06-29
Court Decision / Holding
The court held that Clause 8 of Appendix I of Ext.P1 governs and that the optees are entitled to seniority for their prior services according to Rules 27(a) and 27(c). It dismissed WP(C) Nos.12381/2010 and 14091/2010 and disposed of WP(C) No.4599/2010 with the relief that the inter se seniority be finalised by the Directorate of Medical Education expeditiously.
Final Disposition
WP(C) Nos. 12381/2010 and 14091/2010 were dismissed; WP(C) No.4599/2010 was disposed of with a finding in favour of the petitioners on maintaining prior seniority. The Directorate of Medical Education was directed to finalise the inter se seniority list expeditiously.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SARASAN, R
  • AJITHKUMAR K.K.
  • NASAR METHAR M.K
  • INDUKALADHARAN NAIR
  • SATHEESH KUMAR
  • BINU ABRAHAM

Respondents

  • STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
  • DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTAPURAM
  • C.P.JOHN, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • BIJU P.D., JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • BENNY T.T., U.D.CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • JOJU A.T, LD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • SHAKKEER K.A., LD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • DIYON M.J., LD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • GOKULA BALARHTINI K.T, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • ANTONY K.F., UD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR
  • E.S.ANILKUMAR, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • MADHU M.N, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • S.VINOD, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • MANOJ P. NAIR, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • K.G.ARUN, L.D.CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • JOBY CHERIAN, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • KOCHUTHRESSIAMMA VARKEY, SELECTION GRADE TYPIST, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • BEENAKUMARI D., LD TYPIST, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • M.G.VASANTHY, SENIOR GRADE TYPIST, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • M.M.PROTHASIS, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • N.HARIKUMAR, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • M.M.ABRAHAM, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • ABDUL NADVI T.A, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • ANITHA SREEDEVI.S, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • GEETHAMMA C.S., UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • SIJI JOSEPH, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • K.K.SUNIL KUMAR, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • JOB GERVASIS, U.D.CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM
  • ADDL.R29: SMT.CICILIKUTTY JOHN, U.D.CLERK (HR.GRADE), MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SMT.P.V.ASHA
  • • SMT.VINEETHA B.
  • • SRI.RIJI RAJENDRAN

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI (FOR ADDL.R3-28)
  • • SRI.N.RAGHURAJ (FOR ADDL.R)
  • • SRI.K.AMMINIKUTTY (FOR ADDL.R)
  • • SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR (FOR R-2)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition concerns rival claims to seniority arising from the abolition of the Dual Control System in Kerala’s health administration and the transfer of ministerial, nursing and paramedical staff from the Department of Health Services (DHS) to the Directorate of Medical Education (DME) in 2008. Petitioners, UD clerks from the Medical College Hospital, Kottayam, and their colleagues opted to join the DME and were absorbed into its service. The central issue is whether these optees should retain their prior DHS seniority for inter se ranking and promotion purposes, or be ranked junior as suggested by Sudhakaran v. State of Kerala. Ext.P2 ordered abolition of dual control; Ext.P1 provided the option framework with Appendix I containing Clause 8, stating that seniority of staff opting to be in DME will be maintained per Rules 27(a) and 27(c) of Part II KS&SSR. The Government later clarified Ext.P5, reiterating the Rule 27-based seniority reckoning. While WP(C) Nos.12381/10 and 14091/10 argued for junior ranking and challenged Ext.P5, the court held that Clause 8 of Appendix I governs and that optees are entitled to seniority per Rules 27(a) and 27(c). The court dismissed the other petitions, directed finalisation of the inter se seniority list, and disposed of WP(C) No.4599/2010 in these terms, with WP(C) Nos.12381/10 and 14091/2010 being dismissed.

Provisions of Law Cited

Part II KS&SSR, Rules 27(a) and 27(c)Clause 8 of Appendix I of Ext.P1 order dated 25/10/2008

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contended that after opting to join the Directorate of Medical Education (DME) they must retain their seniority in terms of Clause 8 of Appendix I (Ext.P1), which provides seniority will be maintained per Rules 27(a) and 27(c) of Part II KS&SSR. They relied on the principle that the transfer did not erase prior service for purposes of inter se seniority and promotions. They argued that Ext.P5 clarifications merely reaffirm Ext.P1 and do not alter the established rule.

Contentions of Respondents

The State argued that until inter se seniority is settled, promotions should not be effected and that Ext.P5 was a clarificatory instruction. They relied on Sudhakaran v. State of Kerala to claim that optees should rank junior, but the court found that Sudhakaran relates to inter-district transfers under Proviso to Rule 27(a) and not to the DHS-to-DME option, and thus is not applicable.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sudhakaran v. State of Kerala2006(2)KLT 817 (SC)DistinguishedThe judgment was cited to support junior ranking for optees in inter-district transfers; however, the court clarified that it does not apply to the DHS-to-DME option and distinguished it on facts.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against SARASAN, R., AJITHKUMAR K.K., NASAR METHAR M.K., INDUKALADHARAN NAIR, SATHEESH KUMAR, BINU ABRAHAM v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM; DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM; ADDL. RESPONDENTS (3 TO 28) AND ADDL.R29 SMT.CICILIKUTTY JOHN and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** **PRESENT :** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC** **TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932** **WP(C).No. 4599 of 2010(Y)** **---------------------------------** ## **PETITIONER(S):** - **--------------------** **1. SARASAN, R, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM.** **2. AJITHKUMAR K.K. UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM,** ## **3. NASAR METHAR M.K,** **UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM.** **4. INDUKALADHARAN NAIR, K.R., UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM.** ## **5. SATHEESH KUMAR,** **UD CLERK, KOTTAYAM MEDICAL COLLEGE HEALTH CENTRE, ETTUMANNOR.** **6. BINU ABRAHAM, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOTTAYAM.** **BY ADV. SMT.P.V.ASHA SMT.VINEETHA B. SRI.RIJI RAJENDRAN** ## **RESPONDENT(S):** ## **------------------------** **1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.** **2. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM** **WPC NO.4599/2010** **-2-** - ***3. C.P.JOHN, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT CHEMPANAKUNNEL HOUSE, MANJAKAD P.O, SHORNUR, PALAKKAD 679 121.** **4. BIJU P.D., JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT PARAKKADAVIL, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O, CALICUT -8.** **5. BENNY T.T., U.D.CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT THALIAKUZHY, KALLETTUMKARA, THRISSUR 680 683.** **6. JOJU A.T, LD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT ARACKAL HOUSE, MARAMCODE, CHETTIKKULAM P.O, THRISSUR 680 721.** **7. SHAKKEER K.A., LD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT KOLANGARA HOUSE, UDAYAGIRI, ARAMKALLU, MANNUTHY P.O, THRISSUR 680 651.** **8. DIYON M.J., LD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR RESIDING AT MANGALATHU PARAMBIL HOUSE, VELLANGALLUR P.O, THRISSUR 680 662.** **9. GOKULA BALARHTINI K.T, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT MANDOLI HOUSE, P.O, ANJUR-MUNDUR, THRISSUR 680 549.** **10. ANTONY K.F., UD CLERK, GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT KUTTIKKATTIL HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM P.O, THRISSUR.** **11. E.S.ANILKUMAR, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT KANACKANCHERIYIL, VADAKKENIRA P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **12. MADHU M.N, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT MANTHURUTHIYIL, MANTHURUTHY P,O, NEDUMKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM.** **WPC NO.4599/2010** **-2-** **13. S.VINOD, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT VINOD BHAVAN, NELLUVILA P.O, TRIVANDRUM.** **14. MANOJ P. NAIR, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT NUNDENMACKEL, PANAMATTOM P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **15. K.G.ARUN, L.D.CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT KOLLAMKUZHIYIL, POONJAR P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **16. JOBY CHERIAN, LD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT PLAKIYEL, KURUMULLOOR P.O, KANAKKARY, KOTTAYAM.** **17. KOCHUTHRESSIAMMA VARKEY, SELECTION GRADE TYPIST, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKETHIL, LAKKATTOOR P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **18. BEENAKUMARI D., LD TYPIST, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT THANACHERIL ILLOM, KIZHAKKENADA, KUMARANALLOOR, KOTTAYAM.** **19. M.G.VASANTHY, SENIOR GRADE TYPIST, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT QUARTERS NO.F7, GANDHINAGAR P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **20. M.M.PROTHASIS, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT MAMKOTTATHIL, MOOZHIKULANGARA P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **21. N.HARIKUMAR, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT REGHUSADANAM, MAMKAKUZHY P.O, MAVELIKARA, M.N.NARAYANA PILLAI.** **22. M.M.ABRAHAM, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT MANNUPARAMPIL, NEENDOOR P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **23. ABDUL NADVI T.A, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT H.NO.1/1597, SOUTH THAMARAPARAMBA, FORT COCHI.** **WPC NO.4599/2010** **-2-** **24. ANITHA SREEDEVI.S, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT SREERANGAM, AYMANA P.O, KOTTAYAM.** **25. GEETHAMMA C.S., UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT QUARTERS NO.F3, GANDHINAGAR, KOTTAYAM.** **26. SIJI JOSEPH, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM RESIDING AT KURISUMOOTTIL, PATTITHANAM PO KOTTAYAM.** **27. K.K.SUNIL KUMAR, UD CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, RESIDING AT KARIMATH HOUSE, KANDANAD P.O, THIRUVAMKULAM, ERNAKULAM.** - ***28. JOB GERVASIS, U.D.CLERK, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM RESIDING AT PULICKANICKAL, CHEMAKKALA P.O, MANJOOR, KOTTAYAM.`** **(ADDL.RESPONDENTS *3 TO *28 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT 15/3/2010 IN IA NO.3824/10.)** **ADDL.R29: SMT.CICILIKUTTY JOHN, U.D.CLERK (HR.GRADE), MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM** **(ADDL.R29 IS IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DT 24.3.2010 IN IA 4427/10.)** **ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI FOR ADDL.R3-28 SRI.N.RAGHURAJ FOR ADDL.R SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY FOR ADDL.R SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NANDAKUMARFOR R-2** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2010, ALONG WITH WPC NOS.12381 AND 14091/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **WPC NO.4599/10** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS** **EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF UD CLERKS UNDER DHS.** **EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF GO(MS) NO.124/2007/H&FWD DT 1.6.2007. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) NO.548/2008/H&FWD DT 25.10.2008.** **EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.PLA1-2462/05/DHS DT 28.2.2009 EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF GO(P) NO.167/2009/H&FWD DT 17.6.09. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.H3-1431/2008/DME-B1 DT 29.8.09. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF SENIORITY LIST OF UD CLERKS DT 1.12.08.** **EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF SENIORITY LIST OF JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENTS FROM 1.2.08 TO 1.12.08.** **EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT 27.10.09 UNDER RTI ACT.** **EXT.P9(a): TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT 25.11.09 OF PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER.** **EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF OPTEES IN THE CADRE OF LAY SECRETARY.** **EXT.P10(a): TRUE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF SENIOR SUPERINTENDENTS.** **EXT.P10(b): TRUE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF ACCOUNTS OFFICERS.** **EXT.P10(c): TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF OPTEES IN THE CADRE OF JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENTS.** **EXT.P11: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 4.2.10 OF 1ST PETITIONER.** **EXT.P12: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF 2ND PETITIONER.** ## **//TRUE COPY//** ## **P.A. TO JUDGE** **Rp** ## **ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NOs. 4599, 12381 & 14091 OF 2010 ==============================** ## **Dated this the 29[th] day of June, 2010** ## **J U D G M E N T** The rival claims for seniority among two sets of employees of the Department of Medical Education is what arises for consideration in these writ petitions. 2. By Ext.P2 order in WP(C) No.4599/10, Dual Control System was abolished by the Government of Kerala. Pursuant to the said order, by order dated 25/10/08 (Ext.P1 in WP(C) No.14091/10) ministerial staff, nurses, paramedical staff including last grade staff under the establishment of Director of Health Services and working in the Medical Education Department were to be brought under the administrative control of the Director of Medical Education subject to the employees filing option in accordance with the rules of option incorporated in the said order. Appendix 1 of the said order provides the rules for filing option by the staff of the Director of Health Services (DHS for short) on abolition of Dual Control System. Clause 8 of Appendix 1 provided that “the seniority of the staff opted to Department of Medical Education will be maintained as per Rules 27(a)and 27(c) of Part II **WPC NOs. 4599, 12381 & 14091 OF 2010 :2 :** KS & SSR”. 3. Petitioners in WP(C) NO.4599/10 are employees, who had exercised option to come over to the Department of Medical Education Service (DME for short). They filed WP(C)No.4599/10 claiming that once they opt for DME and are absorbed in the DME, they are entitled to retain their existing seniority in terms of Clause 8 of Appendix 1 of Ext.P1 referred to above. 4. During the pendency of that writ petition, by order dated 31/3/2010, (Ext.P2 in WP(C) No.14091/10), promotions were effected to the post of Junior Superintendent and Upper Division Clerks in the DME. Subsequently, by order dated 6/4/2010, (Ext.P4 in WP(C) No.14091/10), Ext.P2 order was cancelled on the ground that the inter se seniority list of employees of the DME and those who have opted to come over to DME were not finalised. Still later, by order dated 24/4/2010, (Ext.P5 in WP(C) No.14091/10), the Government clarified Ext.P1 referred to above in the following terms: In the circumstances stated above, it is clarified that the seniority of staff of Health Service Department in the categories of Medical Education Department to which they have been absorbed by exercising the option as per the Government Order second cited has to be **WPC NOs. 4599, 12381 & 14091 OF 2010 :3 :** reckoned as per Rule 27(a) and 27(c) of Part II KS&SSR ie as per the date of order of promotion in the case of promotees and as per the date of first effective advice in the case of direct recruits (entry cadre) in the respective categories in Health Service Department. 5. It was thereupon that WP(C) No.12381/10 and 14091/10 were filed by persons, who were employees of the DME. According to them, on exercising option and coming over to DME, the optees should rank junior most in seniority, and therefore, the clarification as contained in Ext.P5 referred to above is illegal. Therefore, the only question that arises is whether the optees of DHS who have come over to DME are entitled to retain their seniority for their prior service in DHS. 6. In my view, the issue can be answered with reference to Clause 8 of Appendix I of Ext.P1 order dated 25/10/2008, which provides that seniority of staff opted to Department of Medical Education will be maintained as per Rule 27(a) and Rule 27(c) of Part II KS & SSR. This precisely is what is reiterated in Ext.P5 and this order does not introduce anything which is not provided in Ext.P1. Clause 8 of Appendix 1 of Ext.P1 is also not under challenge in WP(C) Nos.12381/10 or 14091/10. If that be so, necessarily, optees like the petitioners in WP(C) No.4599/10 and ## **WPC NOs. 4599, 12381 & 14091 OF 2010 :4 :** the additional party respondents in WP(C) No.14091/2010 are entitled to seniority for their prior services under the DHS in terms of Rules 27(a) and (c) of Part II KS&SSR. 7. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in WP(C) No.14091/10 and 12381/10 relied on the Apex Court judgment in _**Sudhakaran v. State of Kerala**_ (2006(2)KLT 817 (SC) to contend that, on exercising option and coming over to the Directorate of Medical Education, the optees should rank junior most. However, a reading of the judgment shows that, in that judgment, the Apex Court was concerned with the claim of seniority of inter district transferees which is governed by the Proviso to Rule 27(a), which says that on request based inter district transfer, the transferee will be junior most in the transferred unit. Therefore, the said judgment has no application to the facts of this case. 8. The other grievance raised in WP(C) Nos.12381/10 and 14091/10 is that until the seniority is settled by drawing up an inter se seniority list, further promotions should not be effected. In the counter affidavit filed by the State in WP(C) No.4599/10, it has been stated thus:- **WPC NOs. 4599, 12381 & 14091 OF 2010 :5 :** The process of shifting of staff have not been completed so far. Promotions to the post of Junior Superintendents can be made after preparing seniority list of Upper Division Clerks including the U.D. Clerks shifted from Health Services. Only after preparing seniority list of U.D. Clerks the eligibility of the petitioners for promotion can be ascertained. Therefore, this grievance of the petitioners have been addressed by the Government itself. 9. In view of the above, the challenge against Ext.P5 order referred to above dated 24/4/2010 raised in WP(C) Nos.12381/10 and 14091/2010 will stand repelled. The claim of the petitioners in WP(C) No.4599/10 for maintaining seniority for their service prior to exercising option, is upheld, in view of Clause 8 of Appendix 1 of Ext.P1 Government Order dated 25/10/2008 and Ext.P5 dated 24.4.2010 referred to above. The Directorate of Medical Education is directed to finalise the inter se seniority list of the optees and the existing employees of the Department in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible. WP(C) Nos. 12381/2010 and 14091/2010 are dismissed and WP(C) No.4599/2010 is disposed of. ## **ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE** Rp