High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions to CBSE; no costs.

Santooommena Alexander v. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) & Shiksha Kendra, The Regional Officer CBSE, and The Principal, The Indian School Bahrain (WP(C) No. 2955 of 2023)

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C) No. 2955 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Judgment Date
2023-04-13
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of with directions: (a) The 4th respondent shall consider Exhibit P5 and, after completing formalities, forward all requisite records to the 3rd respondent within four weeks; (b) On receipt, the 3rd respondent shall act in terms of Jigya Yadav (supra) and issue the corrected/adapted certificate within six weeks; (c) The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the concerned respondent to ensure compliance. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to CBSE; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Santooommena Alexander

Respondents

  • Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
  • Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi 110092, represented by its Secretary
  • The Regional Officer, Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) PS-1-2, Institutional Area, IP Extension, Patparganj, Delhi 110090
  • The Principal, The Indian School, P.O. Box No. 558, Isa Town, Kingdom of Bahrain

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • MATHEW KURIAKOSE
  • • K.R. ARUN
  • • T.G. SUNIL (PERUMBAVOOR)
  • • J. KRISHNAKUMAR (ADOOR)
  • • C.N. PRAKASH
  • • MONI GEORGE

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri Nirmal S., SC, CBSE

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition by Santooommena Alexander seeks correction of the petitioner’s date of birth in CBSE records. The petitioner asserts the true date of birth is 27.12.1989, supported by Ext.P1 (Birth Certificate), Ext.P3 (Passport), and Ext.P4 (Aadhaar). The CBSE-issued Ext.P2 (Marks Statement, 2006) and Ext.P2(a) (All India SSCE Pass Certificate, 2006) wrongly record 27.12.1990. The petitioner filed Ext.P5 seeking correction and issuance of fresh certificates reflecting 27.12.1989. The petitioner’s counsel relies on the Supreme Court’s Jigya Yadav v. CBSE (2021) SCC Online SC 415, arguing that corrections to CBSE certificates to align with school records are permissible under reasonable conditions and time limits. The respondent CBSE’s counsel submits that the matter can be disposed of in light of Jigya Yadav’s observations. The court reiterates Jigya Yadav’s conclusions (paras 169–172): corrections aligned with school/public documents may be allowed with conditions (affidavit, indemnity, surrender of original certificates, fees, and potentially public notice). It directs the CBSE to process correction or change per Jigya Yadav, directing the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P5 within four weeks and the 3rd respondent to issue the certificate within six weeks after records are transmitted, with no costs incurred, and requires the petitioner to produce a copy of the judgment for compliance.

Provisions of Law Cited

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that his date of birth is 27.12.1989 as supported by Ext.P1 (birth certificate), Ext.P3 (passport), and Ext.P4 (Aadhaar). Ext.P2 and Ext.P2(a) incorrectly record 27.12.1990. He filed Ext.P5 requesting correction to reflect 27.12.1989 and to issue fresh certificates. He relies on Jigya Yadav v. CBSE (2021) for a framework allowing correction or change under reasonable conditions and time limits, including affidavits, indemnity, surrender of original certificates, and publication/notice where required.

Contentions of Respondents

The CBSE’s counsel submits that the matter can be disposed of in light of Jigya Yadav (supra). The court should apply those observations to process corrections under the CBSE byelaws, including potential periods for retention of records, affidavits, indemnities, and the possibility of issuing fresh certificates with appropriate captions/annotations. The challenge is to ensure the correction aligns with school records and public documents, with due regard to procedural safeguards and reasonable time limits.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Jigya Yadav v. CBSE2021 SCC Online SC 415PositiveCourt relied on Jigya Yadav to authorize CBSE corrections/changes to certificates with conditions and procedural safeguards.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Santooommena Alexander v. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) & Shiksha Kendra, The Regional Officer CBSE, and The Principal, The Indian School Bahrain (WP(C) No. 2955 of 2023) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICERAJAVIJAYARAGHAVANV THURSDAY,THE13[TH]DAYOFAPRIL2023/23RDCHAITHRA,1945 WP(C)NO.2955OF2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` SANTOOOMMENALEXANDER AGED33YEARS S/O.T.K.ALEXANDER,DAIVATHINVEETTIL,KANNAMCODE, - ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTADISTRICT,PIN691523 NOWRESIDINGAT511-1050MARKHAMRD, SCARBOROUGH,ON,MIH2Y7,CANADA REP.BYFATHER&POWEROFATTORNEYHOLDER, T.K.ALEXANDER,AGED61YEARS,S/O.O.KOCHUMMEN, DAIVATHINVEETTILPEEDIKAYIL,KANNAMCODE,ADOOR, – PATHANAMTHITTADISTRICT,PIN691523 BYADVS. MATHEWKURIAKOSE K.R.ARUN T.G.SUNIL(PERUMBAVOOR) J.KRISHNAKUMAR(ADOOR) C.N.PRAKASH MONIGEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1CENTRALBOARDOFSECONDARYEDUCATION(CBSE) SHIKSHAKENDRA,2,COMMUNITYCENTRE,PREETVIHAR, - DELHI110092,REPRESENTEDBYITSSECRETARY, 2THESECRETARY, CENTRALBOARDOFSECONDARYEDUCATION(CBSE) SHIKSHAKENDRA,2,COMMUNITYCENTRE, - PREETVIHAR,DELHI,PIN110092 3THEREGIONALOFFICER CENTRALBOARDOFSECONDARYEDUCATION(CBSE)PS1-2, INSTITUTIONALAREA,I.P.EXTN,PATPARGANJ, - DELHI,PIN110090 ``` W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 2 ``` 4THEPRINCIPAL,THEINDIANSCHOOL P.O.BOXNO.558,ISATOWN, - KINGDOMOFBAHRAIN,PHONE00973-17684166 - EMAILINFO@INDIANSCHOOL.BH, PRINCIPAL@INDIANSCHOOL.BH. ``` ``` BYADVSRI.NIRMALS.,SC,CBSE ``` ``` THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION ON13.04.2023,THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 3 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs: “ i. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction commanding the 4th respondent to correct the entry as regards the date of birth of the petitioner in the school records as 27.12.1989. ii. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent or other officer concerned of the 1st respondent to correct the entry as regards the date of birth of the petitioner as 27.12.1989 in Ext.P2 mark statement and P2(a) pass certificate, and to issue fresh mark statement and pass certificate to the petitioner showing his date of birth as 27.12.1989.” 2. The case of the petitioner is that he was born on 27.12.1989, as is evidenced by Ext.P1 Birth Certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Kottarakkara Municipality. Reliance is placed on Ext.P3 passport and Ext.P4 Aadhaar card to substantiate that the date of birth mentioned in all these records is 27.12.1989. The grievance of the petitioner is that in Ext.P2 Secondary School Examination Marks Statement and Ext.P2(a) All India Secondary School Examination, 2006 Pass Certificate issued by the CBSE, the date of birth is wrongly entered as 27.12.1990. In the said circumstance, W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 4 Ext.P5 application was filed by the petitioner before the 4th respondent to update the correct date of birth. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this matter is covered by the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in **Jigya Yadav v. CBSE** [2021 SCC Online SC 415] and specifically paragraph No. 194.1 of the report. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the CBSE who submits that the matter can be disposed of in the light of the observations made by the Apex Court in **Jigya Yadav (supra)** 4. I have considered the submissions advanced. 5. The issue relating to the correction of date of birth in the CBSE certificate is already decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Jigya Yadav (supra)** in which it is held as under: ## “CONCLUSION AND DIRECTIONS TO CBSE 169. Although we have discussed the broad issues canvassed before us, in the ultimate analysis the real dispute requiring resolution is about the nature of correction or change, as the case may be, permissible to be carried by the CBSE at the instance of the student including past student. As noted earlier, broadly, two situations would arise. 170. The first is where the incumbent wants “correction” in the certificate issued by the CBSE to be made consistent with the particulars W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 5 mentioned in the school records. As we have held there is no reason for the CBSE to turn down such request or attach any precondition except reasonable period of limitation and keeping in mind the period for which the CBSE has to maintain its record under the extant regulations. While doing so, it can certainly insist for compliance of other conditions by the incumbent, such as, to file sworn affidavit making necessary declaration and to indemnify the CBSE from any claim against it by third party because of such correction. The CBSE would be justified in insisting for surrender/return of the original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) issued by it for replacing it with the fresh certificate to be issued after carrying out necessary corrections with caption/ annotation against the changes carried out and the date of such correction. It may retain the original entries as it is except in respect of correction of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten. The fresh certificate may also contain disclaimer that the CBSE cannot be held responsible for the genuineness of the school records produced by the incumbent in support of the request to record correction in the original CBSE certificate. The CBSE can also insist for reasonable prescribed fees to be paid by the incumbent in lieu of administrative expenses for issuing fresh certificate. At the same time, the CBSE cannot impose precondition of applying for correction consistent with the school records only before publication of results. Such a condition, as we have held, would be unreasonable and excessive. We repeat that if the application for recording correction is based on the school records as it obtained at the time of publication of results and issue of certificate by the CBSE, it will be open to CBSE to provide for reasonable limitation period within which the application for recording correction in certificate issued by it may be entertained by it. However, if the request for recording change is based on changed school records post the publication of results and issue of certificate by the CBSE, the candidate would be W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 6 entitled to apply for recording such a change within the reasonable limitation period prescribed by the CBSE. In this situation, the candidate cannot claim that she had no knowledge about the change recorded in the school records because such a change would occur obviously at her instance. If she makes such application for correction of the school records, she is expected to apply to the CBSE immediately after the school records are modified and which ought to be done within a reasonable time. Indeed, it would be open to the CBSE to reject the application in the event the period for preservation of official records under the extant regulations had expired and no record of the candidate concerned is traceable or can be reconstructed. In the case of subsequent amendment of school records, that may occur due to different reasons including because of choice exercised by the candidate regarding change of name. To put it differently, request for recording of correction in the certificate issued by the CBSE to bring it in line with the school records of the incumbent need not be limited to application made prior to publication of examination results of the CBSE. 171. As regards request for “change” of particulars in the certificate issued by the CBSE, it presupposes that the particulars intended to be recorded in the CBSE certificate are not consistent with the school records. Such a request could be made in two different situations. The first is on the basis of public documents like Birth Certificate, Aadhaar Card/Election Card, etc. and to incorporate change in the CBSE certificate consistent therewith. The second possibility is when the request for change is due to the acquired name by choice at a later point of time. That change need not be backed by public documents pertaining to the candidate. (a) Reverting to the first category, as noted earlier, there is a legal presumption in relation to the public documents as envisaged in the 1872 Act. Such public documents, therefore, cannot be ignored by the CBSE. Taking note of those documents, the CBSE may entertain the request for W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 7 recording change in the certificate issued by it. This, however, need not be unconditional, but subject to certain reasonable conditions to be fulfilled by the applicant as may be prescribed by the CBSE, such as, of furnishing sworn affidavit containing declaration and to indemnify the CBSE and upon payment of prescribed fees in lieu of administrative expenses. The CBSE may also insist for issuing Public Notice and publication in the Official Gazette before recording the change in the fresh certificate to be issued by it upon surrender/return of the original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) by the applicant. The fresh certificate may contain disclaimer and caption/annotation against the original entry (except in respect of change of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten) indicating the date on which change has been recorded and the basis thereof. In other words, the fresh certificate may retain original particulars while recording the change along with caption/annotation referred to above (except in respect of change of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten). (b) However, in the latter situation where the change is to be effected on the basis of new acquired name without any supporting school record or public document, that request may be entertained upon insisting for prior permission/declaration by a Court of law in that regard and publication in the Official Gazette including surrender/ return of original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) issued by CBSE and upon payment of prescribed fees. The fresh certificate as in other situations referred to above, retain the original entry (except in respect of change of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten) and to insert caption/annotation indicating the date on which it has been recorded and other details including disclaimer of CBSE. This is so because the CBSE is not required to adjudicate nor has the mechanism to verify the correctness of the claim of the applicant. W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 8 172. In light of the above, in exercise of our plenary jurisdiction, we direct the CBSE to process the applications for correction or change, as the case may be, in the certificate issued by it in the respective cases under consideration. Even other pending applications and future applications for such request be processed on the same lines and in particular the conclusion and directions recorded hitherto in paragraphs 170 and 171, as may be applicable, until amendment of relevant Byelaws. Additionally, the CBSE shall take immediate steps to amend its relevant Byelaws so as to incorporate the stated mechanism for recording correction or change, as the case may be, in the certificates already issued or to be issued by it. 173. Accordingly, we dispose of the cases before us with directions to the CBSE as noted in paragraphs 170 to 172 above. No order as to costs.” In that view of the matter, in terms of the directions issued by the Apex Court in **Jigya Yadav** (supra), this writ petition is ordered as under: - a) The 4th respondent shall consider Exhibit P5 application submitted by the petitioner and after completing the necessary formalities shall forward all the requisite records to the 3rd respondent within a period of four weeks from today. - b) On receipt of such records, the 3rd respondent W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 9 shall act in terms of the directions in **Jigya Yadav** (supra) and issue the certificate within a further period of six weeks. c) The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the concerned respondent to ensure compliance. Sd/- **RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE** NS W.P.(C) No.2955 of 2023 10 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2955/2023`** |`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`|| |---|---| |`Exhibit P1`|`TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATED`| ||`04.08.2022 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS &`| ||`DEATHS, KOTTARAKKARA MUNICIPALITY TO THE`| ||`PETITIONER`| |`Exhibit P2`|`TRUE COPY OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL EXAMINATION`| ||`MARKS STATEMENT, 2006 DATED 27.05.2006 ISSUED`| ||`BY CBSE TO THE PETITIONER`| |`Exhibit P 2(a)`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ALL INDIA SECONDARY SCHOOL`| ||`EXAMINATION, 2006 PASS CERTIFICATE DATED`| ||`27.05.2006 ISSUED BY THE CBSE TO THE`| ||`PETITIONER`| |`Exhibit P3`|`TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE INDIAN`| ||`PASSPORT NO. T9448046 OF THE PETITIONER`| |`Exhibit P4`|`TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD NO. 3433 3534`| ||`1236 OF THE PETITIONER`| |`Exhibit P5`|`TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 21.11.2022`| ||`SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH`| ||`RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT`| ||`WITH ITS POSTAL RECEIPTS`| |`Exhibit P6`|`TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.10.2019 IN`| ||`W.P.(C) NO. 26076 OF 2019 OF THIS HON'BLE`| ||`COURT`| |`Exhibit P7`|`TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DATED`| ||`06.01.2023 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER`|