High CourtDivision BenchDirected that NEET be held for 2016-17 admissio...

Sankalp Charitable Trust and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case / Petition Number:Writ Petition (C) No. 261 of 2016
Neutral Citation:[2016] 3 SCR 547

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil R. Dave
  • Shiva Kirti Singh
  • Adarsh Kumar Goel
Judgment Date
2016-04-28
Court Decision / Holding
NEET shall be held for admission to MBBS/BDS courses for the academic year 2016-17 in pursuance of the Notifications dated 21 December 2010 issued by MCI and DCI; notwithstanding any court order earlier regarding NEET, this order shall operate; no further order is required at this stage. The petition will be listed for further proceedings. The Court notes that the petitions pending before it will not be affected by this order.
Final Disposition
Directed that NEET be held for 2016-17 admissions; previous contrary orders are superseded for the purpose of NEET; no further order at this stage; petition pending for further proceedings.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sankalp Charitable Trust
  • Anr.

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • Others (Ors.)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Amit Kumar
  • • Avijit Mani Tripathi
  • • Ms. Rekha Bakshi
  • • Shaurya Sahay

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG
  • • Yikas Singh, Sr. Adv.
  • • Ajay Sharma, Adv.
  • • M. P. Gupta, Adv.
  • • Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv.
  • • R. S. Nagar, Adv.
  • • R. K. Rathore, Adv.
  • • D. S. Mahra
  • • Tara Chandra Sharma, Adv.
  • • Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv.
  • • Rajeev Sharma, Adv.
  • • Rupesh Kumar, Adv.
  • • Prabal Bagchi, Adv.
  • • Gaurav Sharma, Adv.
  • • Dhawal Mohan, Adv.
  • • Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv.
  • • Prateek Bhatia, Adv.
  • • Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv.
  • • Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Adv.
  • • Kapeesh Seth, Adv.

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition concerns admission to MBBS through NEET for the academic year 2016-17. The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS courses across the country. The matter was heard on 27-28 April 2016. The Court relies on Notifications dated 21 December 2010 issued by the Medical Council of India and the Dental Council of India mandating NEET as the common entrance test, and records that NEET shall be held in pursuance of these Notifications. The respondents proposed a phased NEET schedule: Phase I (AIPMT 2016) on 1 May 2016, Phase II on 24 July 2016 with applications and fees, and a combined result to be declared on 17 August 2016, with All-India Rank to be provided by CBSE; counselling to follow on that basis. Some non-parties argued against NEET on the basis of a prior judgment (Christian Medical College, Vellore) which the Court recalls on 11 April 2016; thus the Notification remains in operation. The Court holds that NEET shall be held and notes that, notwithstanding earlier court orders, this order shall operate; petitions pending will not be affected and will be listed for further proceedings."

Provisions of Law Cited

Notifications dated 21 December 2010 issued by the Medical Council of India and the Dental Council of India (DCI)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners submit that the country-wide admissions to MBBS courses must be anchored in NEET, as mandated by the 2010 Notifications of the Medical Council of India and the Dental Council of India. They seek a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct NEET for the 2016-17 academic session, arguing that uniform entrance testing ensures fairness, standardization, and transparency in admissions nationwide. They contend that prior court orders should not obstruct the implementation of NEET and underline that the CBSE would coordinate the exam, counselling would follow based on All-India Rank, and security measures (e.g., jammers) must be deployed to ensure timely and fair conduct. They request the Court to remove any office objections and to list the matter for immediate scheduling.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents advocate holding NEET in compliance with the 2010 MCI/DCI Notifications. They propose a phased NEET plan: Phase I (AIPMT 2016) on 1 May 2016; Phase II on 24 July 2016; combined result on 17 August 2016; CBSE to provide All-India Rank; counselling based on that rank; involvement of Central/State authorities, institutions and police with necessary security arrangements; they emphasize that any difficulties may be brought to the Court and that, on their submissions, NEET will be held as proposed. They assert that the prior Christian Medical College decision has been recalled and that the Notifications are in operation, unimpeded by earlier adjudications."

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Christian Medical College, Vellore & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.2013 (7) SCR 908; (2014) (2) SCC 305OverruledThe Court recalls this judgment on 11 April 2016, holding that it is no longer good law for NEET-related issues, thereby treating it as overruled for the purposes of the present matter.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sankalp Charitable Trust and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

[2016] 3 S.C.R. 547 SANKALP CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. 'v. ## UNION OF INDJA AND ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 261 of2016) B ## APRIL 28; 2016 ## [ANIL R. DAVE, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] _Education/Educational Institutions: Admission to MBBS course_ - _National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) -Academic year 2016-17_ - _Writ of mandamus or any other relief/or directing respondents to conduct NEET for admission to MBBS course throughout the country for academic session 2016-17_ - _Held: Common Entrance Test i.e. NEET shall be held in pursuance of Notification dated 21.12.2010 issued by Medical Council of India and Dental Council of India_ - _Notwithstanding any order passed by any court earlier with regard to not holding NEET. this order shall operate_ ~ _Therefore, nofurther order is required to be passed at this stage._ _Christian Medical College, Vellore & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors._ 2013 (7) SCR 908 : (2014) (2) SCC 305 - referred to. c D E ## Case Law Reference 2013 (7) SCR 908 referred to Para 8 · F CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDJCTION : Writ Petition (C) No. 261 of2016. Amit Kumar, Avijit Mani Tripathi, Ms. Rekha Bakshi, Shaurya Sahay, Advs. for the Petitioners. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Yikas Singh, Sr. Adv., Ajay Sharma, M. P. Gupta, Ms. Rekha Pandey, R. S. Nagar, R. K. Rathore, (For D. S. Mahra), Tara Chandra Sharma, Ms. Neelam Sharma, Rajeev Sharma, Rupesh Kumar, Ajay Sharma, Prabal Bagchi, Gaurav Sharma, Dhawal Mohan, Ms. Deepika Kalia, Prateek Bhatia, Ms. Vara Gaur, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Kapeesh Seth, Advs. for the Respondents. 547 G H 548 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 3 S.C.R. A The following Order of the Court was delivered ## **ORDER** 1. The following prayer has been made in this petition: B "a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direciton in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to conduct the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS Course throughout the country for academic session 2016-17; C (b) Jssue or pass any writ, direction or order, which this Hon 'hie Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. When the matter was heard on 27th April, 2016, the following order was passed by this Court : D E F "Taken on board. The learned counsel for the petitioner has assured this Court that he will remove the office objections by tomorrow. At his request, Respondent No.4 is deleted from · the array of parties. All the three respondents are represented by their respective counsel and they have assured this Court that they are ready and willing to hold NEET examination for 3 admission to MBBS and BOS courses for the academic year 2016-17. As the counsel representing CBSE would like to take necessary instructions, hearing is adjourned for tomorrow. Proposed schedule of the examination to be held, shall be submitted in the Court tomorrow. The learned counsel shall also see that a responsible officer of the CBSE, who can take on the spot decision, remains present in the Court. G Listthe matter tomorrow, i.e., 28th April, 2016 at 12.00 p.m." 3. The matter has been thereafter heard today. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for all the respondents that it is proposed to hold the examination in pursuance ofNotifications dated 21st December, 2010 issued by the Medical Council of India and the **H** Dental Council oflndia ('DC!' for short). SANKALP CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. v. UNION OF 549 INDlA AND ORS. 4. As per the said Notifications, a common entrance test, i.e., A National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) shall be held. 5. It was further submitted, interalia, as follows: "I. AIPMT 2016 to be held on I st May, 2016 shall be phase l of NEET. 2. Phase II ofNEET for the left out candidates shall be held on 24th July, 2016 by inviting applications with fee. B 3: Combined result of both the Tests shall be declared on 17th August, 2016. 4. CBSE will provide All India Rank. Admitting Authorities will invite applications for Counselling and merit list shall be drawn based on All India Rank. C 5. All associated with conduct of Exam including Central Govt., State Govt., institutions, Police etc. will extend all necessary support to CBSE and permit security 4 measures like use of electronic and communication devices D Jammers etc. for timely and fair conduct of the NEET. · 6. Any difficulty with regard to implementation of orders of this Com1 the stake holders may approach this Hon'ble Court." 6. The learned counsel have also given the details with regard to E the time when the result would be declared and counselling would take place. 7. In view ofthe submissions made on behalf of the respondents, we record that NEET shall be held as stated by the respondents. We further clarify that notwithstanding any order passed by any Court earlier with regard to not holding NEET, this order shall operate. Therefore, no further order is required to be passed at this stage. F 8. It may be mentioned here that some learned counsel representing those who are not parties to this petition have made submissions that in view of the judgment passed in Christian Medical G College, Vellore & Ors. Vs. Union oflndia & Ors., reported in (2014) 2 SCC 305, it would not be proper to hold NEET and this order should not affect pending matters. 9. We do not agree with the first submission for the reason that the said judgment has already been recalled on 11th April, 2016 and H 550 [2016] 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS - A therefore, the Notifications dated 21st December, 201 0 are in operation as on today. - It may however be clarified that by this order hearing of the - petitions which are pending before this Court will not be affected. B The petition be now listed in due course. Devika Gujral Writ petition pending.