High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed with directions directing expeditious ...

Sandhya v. Special Tahsildar (LR) Land Tribunal Tirur and Another

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H)
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-23
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur to dispose of S.M.No.336/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by Narayanan Namboodiri and the guidelines in G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed with directions directing expeditious disposal of S.M.No.336/2020 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sandhya, aged 40 years, D/o Krishnananair, Palliyaayil, Kuttipuram, Malappuram District, Kerala-679 571

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR) Land Tribunal Tirur, Tirur P.O., Malappuram District, Kerala-676 101
  • The Village Officer, Melmuri Village, Malappuram District, Kerala, PIN-676 505

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri.P.T.Sheeji sh

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Jestin Mathew - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner Sandhya files a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to direct the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.336/2020 pending on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur. The suo motu proceedings, initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, relate to assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Sections 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under those provisions, in respect of 7.38 acres in Re-Sy.No.300/1, Melmuri Village, Malappuram District. The Court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (14.03.2018) directing expeditious disposal of cases, adherence to seniority of registrations, and flexibility in obtaining reports (via Village Officers) to avoid delay, especially for senior citizens. It also notes the Government Order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (22.02.2018) and the need to implement its guidance. After hearing, the Court directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.336/2020 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, without awarding costs. The petition is disposed.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5Rule 14G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RDSection 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases
  • Seniority of registration
  • Not breaking the seniority of cases
  • Priority to senior citizens' cases

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.336/2020, relying on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision to ensure disposal on seniority and to utilize reports from Village Officers to avoid delays. The aim is to obtain timely certificate of purchase and loan facilities; the Court’s directions are sought to expedite the process while following due process and statutory provisions.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents highlight the enormous pendency before the Land Tribunal and emphasize adherence to seniority, use of Village Officers reports where Revenue Inspectors are overburdened, and implementation of directions for expeditious disposal, particularly for senior citizens. They contend that disposal must proceed within the prescribed statutory and administrative framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No. 28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision for expeditious disposal and seniority-based processing, and for allowing reports via Village Officers; this case provides the governing framework for the directions in the present judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sandhya v. Special Tahsildar (LR) Land Tribunal Tirur and Another and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SANDHYA, AGED 40 YEARS D/O KRISHNANANAIR, PALLIYAAYIL, KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 571.** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LR) LAND TRIBUNAL TIRUR, TIRUR P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA-676 101. 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MELMURI VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-676 505.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SRI JESTIN MATHEW - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.336/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 7.38 Ares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.300/1 of Melmuri Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Melmuri Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.336/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P2 certificate dated 20.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.336/2020 W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.336/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7471 OF 2021(H) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 1.7.2019** **EXHIBIT P2** **THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SUOMOTO PROCEEDINGS IN SM NO 336/2020 DATED 20.2.2021**