Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & ORS.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- Madan B. Lokur
- S. Abdul Nazeer
- Deepak Gupta
- Judgment Date
- 2018-11-27
- Court Decision / Holding
- There are six issues identified; the Court directs further listing in the second week of January 2019; requires affidavits or status reports to be filed and handed to the Amicus at least three days in advance; the status reports are to cover registration of child care institutions, compliance with orders dated 08.10.2018, and progress on SOP and Child Protection Policy; the matter to be listed again to assess progress.
- Final Disposition
- Directions for further listing
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Sampurna Behrua
Respondents
- Union of India
- ORS
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Ms. Aparna Bhat
- • Ms. Shivangi Singh
- • Tipoo Ningombam
Counsels for Respondents
- • Pinky Anand
- • Niraj Gupta
- • Anshu Gupta
- • Shailinder F Saini
- • S. Wasim A. Qadri
- • B. V. Balram Das
- • Raj Bahadur Yadav
- • Ms. Snidha Mehra
- • Chakitan Vikram Shekhar Papta
- • R. R. Rajesh
- • Vikas Bansal
- • G. S. Makker
- • Gopal Singh
- • Manish Kumar
- • Sudhir Naagar
- • Binay Kumar Pandey
- • Ms. Vrinda Grover
- • Soutik Banerjee
- • Dr. Anindita Pujari
- • Ms. Aarti Kumar
- • Ms. Harsha Garg
Case Synopsis & Summary
Supreme Court of India heard Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & Ors., a Civil Original matter under Article 32 of the Constitution in relation to the welfare and protection of children under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2015. The Court identified six issues requiring resolution in the petition, relating to the development and implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for violence against children, including those outside child care institutions, and to ongoing studies and policies affecting child welfare. It noted that the Ministry of Women and Child Development is preparing an SOP but has not yet finalized it; an interim advisory has been issued to state governments in the interim. An interim report from the NCPCR has been circulated to ten States, with twelve more in process, though information on registration of child care institutions under the 2015 Act remains incomplete in several States. The Court also discussed the status of the Child Protection Policy, with the first draft expected in December 2018, and urged wide circulation and submission for Amicus Curiae comments. The matter involves potential strengthening of national bodies such as the National Institution for Public Cooperation and Child Development, and a need for complete status reports on Child Welfare Committees and Juvenile Justice Boards. The Court directed submissions and study of the States’ reports, with the matter to be listed again in January 2019. Any affidavits or status reports must be provided to the Amicus three days in advance.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The applicants contend that the six issues require urgent attention and that the SOP for children who are victims of violence should be developed promptly; interim measures and NCPCR interim report should be expeditiously reviewed; full registration of child care institutions under the Juvenile Justice Act must be completed and information furnished to NCPCR; the Child Protection Policy should be drafted and circulated widely; strengthening of National Institute for Public Cooperation and Child Development should be undertaken; status reports from States must be complete and action taken; all affidavits to Amicus three days in advance. The Court should ensure timely compliance with its 2018 orders and the effective protection of child rights.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents submit that an SOP is in preparation and an interim advisory has been issued; interim NCPCR report has been shared with several States and more are in process; registration of child care institutions under the 2015 Act is being pursued and complete information should be provided to NCPCR; the Child Protection Policy is being drafted with broad consultation; the matter calls for continued monitoring, with the Court directing further listing and review of reports; the government requests that the court allow time for the policy and structures to take shape.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & ORS. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.