High CourtDivision BenchDirections for further listing

Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & ORS.

Case / Petition Number:M.A. No. 2069/2018 in Writ Petition (C) No. 473/2005
Neutral Citation:[2018] 14 S.C.R. 392

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Madan B. Lokur
  • S. Abdul Nazeer
  • Deepak Gupta
Judgment Date
2018-11-27
Court Decision / Holding
There are six issues identified; the Court directs further listing in the second week of January 2019; requires affidavits or status reports to be filed and handed to the Amicus at least three days in advance; the status reports are to cover registration of child care institutions, compliance with orders dated 08.10.2018, and progress on SOP and Child Protection Policy; the matter to be listed again to assess progress.
Final Disposition
Directions for further listing

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sampurna Behrua

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • ORS

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Ms. Aparna Bhat
  • • Ms. Shivangi Singh
  • • Tipoo Ningombam

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Pinky Anand
  • • Niraj Gupta
  • • Anshu Gupta
  • • Shailinder F Saini
  • • S. Wasim A. Qadri
  • • B. V. Balram Das
  • • Raj Bahadur Yadav
  • • Ms. Snidha Mehra
  • • Chakitan Vikram Shekhar Papta
  • • R. R. Rajesh
  • • Vikas Bansal
  • • G. S. Makker
  • • Gopal Singh
  • • Manish Kumar
  • • Sudhir Naagar
  • • Binay Kumar Pandey
  • • Ms. Vrinda Grover
  • • Soutik Banerjee
  • • Dr. Anindita Pujari
  • • Ms. Aarti Kumar
  • • Ms. Harsha Garg

Case Synopsis & Summary

Supreme Court of India heard Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & Ors., a Civil Original matter under Article 32 of the Constitution in relation to the welfare and protection of children under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2015. The Court identified six issues requiring resolution in the petition, relating to the development and implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for violence against children, including those outside child care institutions, and to ongoing studies and policies affecting child welfare. It noted that the Ministry of Women and Child Development is preparing an SOP but has not yet finalized it; an interim advisory has been issued to state governments in the interim. An interim report from the NCPCR has been circulated to ten States, with twelve more in process, though information on registration of child care institutions under the 2015 Act remains incomplete in several States. The Court also discussed the status of the Child Protection Policy, with the first draft expected in December 2018, and urged wide circulation and submission for Amicus Curiae comments. The matter involves potential strengthening of national bodies such as the National Institution for Public Cooperation and Child Development, and a need for complete status reports on Child Welfare Committees and Juvenile Justice Boards. The Court directed submissions and study of the States’ reports, with the matter to be listed again in January 2019. Any affidavits or status reports must be provided to the Amicus three days in advance.

Provisions of Law Cited

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2015Constitution of India, Article 32

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The applicants contend that the six issues require urgent attention and that the SOP for children who are victims of violence should be developed promptly; interim measures and NCPCR interim report should be expeditiously reviewed; full registration of child care institutions under the Juvenile Justice Act must be completed and information furnished to NCPCR; the Child Protection Policy should be drafted and circulated widely; strengthening of National Institute for Public Cooperation and Child Development should be undertaken; status reports from States must be complete and action taken; all affidavits to Amicus three days in advance. The Court should ensure timely compliance with its 2018 orders and the effective protection of child rights.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents submit that an SOP is in preparation and an interim advisory has been issued; interim NCPCR report has been shared with several States and more are in process; registration of child care institutions under the 2015 Act is being pursued and complete information should be provided to NCPCR; the Child Protection Policy is being drafted with broad consultation; the matter calls for continued monitoring, with the Court directing further listing and review of reports; the government requests that the court allow time for the policy and structures to take shape.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & ORS. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

392 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R.[2018] 14 S.C.R. 392 A ## SAMPURNA BEHRUA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (M.A. No. 2069/2018) B in (W. P. (C) No. 473/2005) NOVEMBER 27, 2018 ## **[MADAN B. LOKUR, S. ABDUL NAZEER AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.]** C _Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2015 – Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for children who are victims of violence – Report of the Study by the NCPCR – Child Protection Policy – National Institution for benefit of Children – Status Report with regard to Child Welfare Committees and Juvenile Justice Boards_ D _– Study of Reports furnished by the States – Directions for further listing._ CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : M.A. No. 2069 of 2018 in Writ Petition (C) No. 473 of 2005. E Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Ms. Aparna Bhat, (A.C.), Ms. Shivangi Singh, Tipoo Ningombam, Advs. Sampurna Behrua (By Courts Motion). Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Niraj Gupta, Anshu Gupta, Shailinder F Saini, S. Wasim A. Qadri, B. V. Balram Das, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Ms. Snidha Mehra, Chakitan Vikram Shekhar Papta, R. R. Rajesh, Vikas Bansal, G. S. Makker, Gopal Singh, Manish Kumar, Sudhir Naagar, Binay Kumar Pandey, Ms. Vrinda Grover, Soutik Banerjee, Dr. Anindita Pujari, Ms. Aarti Kumar, Ms. Harsha Garg, Advs. for the appearing parties. G The following Order of the Court was passed: ## **O R D E R** There are six issues that still require consideration in the present petition: H 392 393 SAMPURNA BEHRUA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ## 1. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for children who are victims of violence We have been informed (and it has been recorded in our order dated 08.10.2018) that the Ministry of Women and Child Development is in the process of preparing / developing an SOP addressing the problem of violence, sexual or otherwise. This is with reference to children in Child Care Institutions and even other children who may not necessarily be in Child Care Institutions. Today, we are told by the learned ASG that the SOP is not ready but in the meanwhile, an interim advisory has been issued to all the State Governments / UTs giving the protocol to be followed. A B C The learned Amicus says that she would like to look into the advisory and make her comments because this information has been given today in the Court. ## 2. Report of the Study by the NCPCR D It is stated by the learned ASG that an interim report has been submitted by the NCPCR. This has been shared with 10 State Governments and sharing the report with 12 other States is in the process. It is not clear whether the report is being shared with the remaining State Governments and UTs. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the NCPCR that some of the States have not yet given the information with regard to number of child care institutions registered under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2015. We expect the State Governments to ensure that registration is complete and information is passed with the NCPCR at least for the sake of children who are living in the States concerned. This should be done within two weeks. E F ## 3. Child Protection Policy On 08.10.2018, we were informed that the Child Protection Policy is on the anvil and it will take about two months or so. G Today, it is stated that the first draft will be ready in December, 2018. We reiterate what we have recorded on 08.10.2018 to the effect that when the first draft is available, it should be circulated widely and also be given to the learned _Amicus_ so that suggestions can be invited from all concerned. H 394 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R. ## A 4. National Institution for benefit of Children It is stated by the learned ASG that the matter has been referred to the Department of Expenditure and tentatively the National Institute for Public Cooperation and Child Development is likely to be the institution that will need strengthening in terms of the suggestion made in the order B dated 08.10.2018. ## 5. Status Report with regard to Child Welfare Committees and Juvenile Justice Boards The learned ASG has handed over to us a status report in compliance of the order dated 08.10.2018. We find that the status report C is incomplete in as much as information in respect of a large number of States / UTs is valid till September, 2018. It is also not clear from the status report whether Child Welfare Committees are in existence in all the districts of the States for which information is available till November, 2018. She says that she will look D into the matter and give the complete status report and also take it up with the State Governments. ## 6. Study of Reports furnished by the States It is stated that the State Governments have furnished reports of the child care institutions pursuant to the meeting held on 18.09.2018. E The State Governments have been asked to study the reports and to intimate the follow up action on or before 30.11.2018. List the matter in the second week of January, 2019. It is pointed out by learned _Amicus_ that even the Reports that F were furnished subsequent to the meeting held on 18.09.2018 are incomplete in some cases. The Ministry of Women and Child Development should take it up with the States . Any affidavit or status report proposed to be filed should be handed over to the learned Amicus at least three days in advance. G Ankit Gyan Directions for further listing. H