Sajna T.P v. State of Kerala & Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Raja Vijayaraghavan V
- Judgment Date
- 2022-11-23
- Court Decision / Holding
- Disposes of the writ petition by directing the respondents 1 to 5 to disburse the salary due to the petitioner for the period from 01.06.2010 to 30.04.2016 on the basis of Ext. P5 proceedings, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is held that Exts. P13, P14 and P15 cannot be made applicable to the petitioner since her appointment was not under GO 29/2016, and the prior Ext. P10 judgment directs payment. The judgment also notes the correction that the period is 01.06.2010 rather than 01.06.2012, as per a later order.
- Final Disposition
- The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to disburse the salary due to the petitioner for the period from 01.06.2010 to 30.04.2016 on the basis of Ext.P5 proceedings, within two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. Exts. P13, P14, P15 are held not applicable to the petitioner; correction to the period (01.06.2010) noted through the I.A. order dated 14/12/2022.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- SAJNA T.P
Respondents
- State of Kerala
- Director of General Education
- District Educational Officer, Thamarassery
- Assistant Educational Officer, Balussery
- Sub Treasury Officer, Balussery
- Manager, Desaseva A.U.P School
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • M.A.FAYAZ
- • M.VISHNUPRIYA
- • C.B.ABHINAVA
Counsels for Respondents
- • SMT MARY BEENA JOSEPH SR GP
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition (WP(C) No. 24170 of 2022) has been filed by Sajna T.P., a junior Urdu teacher at Desaseva A.U.P. School, challenging non-payment of salary arrears for the period from 01.06.2010 to 30.04.2016. The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the arrears based on Ext. P5, which is the endorsement of appointment dated 01.06.2010, and to hold that Ext. P13 G.O. No. 29/2016 and related circulars (Exts. P14, P15) have no application to her case, since her appointment was not granted under the 2016 GO. The Court had previously decided in a prior writ, W.P.(C.) No. 36043/2016 (Ext. P10), that the petitioner was entitled to salary arrears and directed authorities to effect payment, with Ext. P6 being quashed. The 4th respondent sanctioned salary for the 01.06.2010 to 30.04.2016 period (Ext. P11), but the arrears were remitted to the Provident Fund rather than paid to the petitioner. The respondents contend that the later GO and circulars govern, while the petitioner maintains the prior order and reliance on Ext. P5. The judgment ultimately directs disbursement of salary for the relevant period on the basis of Ext. P5 within two months, and clarifies that Exts. P13, P14, P15 are not applicable to the petitioner. A correction later notes the period should be 01.06.2010 to 30.04.2016.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner contends entitlement to salary arrears for the period 01.06.2010 to 30.04.2016 and seeks a mandamus directing disbursement based on Ext. P5, arguing that Ext. P6 (quashed) and Ext. P10 judgment mandated payment; she asserts Exts. P13, P14 and P15 cannot apply as her appointment was not under GO 29/2016 but under Ext. P4. She submits that salary already sanctioned in Ext. P11 should be released rather than diverted to PF, and she seeks interest for the withheld arrears.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents argue that disbursement must follow the governing Government Orders and circulars (Exts. P13–P15, GO 29/2016/G.Edn) applicable to appointments granted through the specified process; they contend the proper channel is to adjust arrears as per those instruments, and that the PF remittance, as reported, reflects the due process; they rely on the earlier directives and the ongoing administrative steps (Ext. P11, P11(a)).
Cited Precedents (2)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| W.P(C) No.36043/2016 | W.P(C) No.36043/2016 | Positive | The Court’s earlier judgment in W.P(C) No.36043/2016 directed the salary arrears be paid and is relied upon to direct payment in the present case. |
| W.P(C) No.23755/2011 | W.P(C) No.23755/2011 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P4 is a cited judgment included as an exhibit; it is referenced but not treated as binding precedent in the decision. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sajna T.P v. State of Kerala & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.