High Court of KeralaSingle JudgePetition disposed of with directions to dispose...

Sajitha v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) & another

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-23
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of; Land Tribunal, Tirur is directed to dispose of S.M. No.177/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions for expeditious disposal and priority to senior citizens.
Final Disposition
Petition disposed of with directions to dispose of S.M. No.177/2021 in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sajitha, aged 62 years W/o. SIEKH HUSSAIN, Soorpil House, Poilissery, Alathiyoor, Malappuram District, PIN-676102

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Tirur, Tirur P.O, Malappuram District, Kerala-676101
  • The Village Officer, Trippangode Village, Malappuram District, Kerala, PIN-676102

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri P.T. Sheejish

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt A.C. Vidhya, Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Sajitha, a 62-year-old senior citizen, invokes Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Special Tahasildar (LR) and the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to conduct expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M.No.177/2021. The Land Tribunal, under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, initiated suo motu proceedings for assignment of the landlord’s vested right, title and interest under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The Government Pleader notes the substantial pendency in Tirur (approximately 4,987 suo motu cases). The Court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri line of decisions, which emphasize expeditious disposal on seniority, and the use of Village Officers to obtain necessary reports to prevent delay. The judgment directs that matters involving senior citizens be prioritized and that reports may be obtained from Village Officers to accelerate processes. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.177/2021 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, guiding the Tribunal to respect seniority and ensure timely disposition without prejudice to due process.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that as a senior citizen she is entitled to expeditious disposal of the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal for assignment under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. She seeks a mandamus directing expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.177/2021, arguing that delays impede access to finance and land rights. Reliance is placed on this Court’s earlier directions in Narayanan Namboodiri, urging prioritization of senior citizens and use of Village Officers to expedite reports while maintaining due process.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize substantial pendency in the Land Tribunal (about 4987 suo motu cases) and contend that disposal must follow the laid-down rules and the Court’s directions. The Government Pleader advocates adherence to seniority-based disposal, use of Village Officers for report collection, and compliance with statutory procedures, while balancing the need for expeditious yet lawful processing.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on and applied the Narayanan Namboodiri directions to expeditiously dispose senior citizen cases and to obtain reports via Village Officers to avoid delays.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sajitha v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) & another and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SAJITHA, AGED 62 YEARS W/O. SIEKH HUSSAIN, SOORPIL HOUSE, POILISSERY, ALATHIYOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 102** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LR),**| |---|---| ||**LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA-676 101**| |**2**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**TRIPPANGODE VILLAGE,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-676 102**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Tahasildar to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.177/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 3.24 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.159/5 of Thriprangode Village, Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) -6- directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Trippangode Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.177/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P2 receipt dated 03.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 62 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.177/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M. No.177/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7510 OF 2021(K) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 07.09.2020.** **EXHIBIT P2** **THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SUOMOTO PROCEEDINGS IN SM NO. 177/2021 DATED 03.02.2021.**