High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; Land Tribunal direct...

Saithoon Umma v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottapalam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6876 of 2021(H)
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • The Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-17
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.157/2021 strictly in accordance with the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), including prioritizing senior citizens and adhering to the seniority-based timelines, with such disposal to be completed in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M.No.157/2021 following Narayanan Namboodiri directions and within the framework of law; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SAITHOON UMMA, AGED 82 YEARS D/O. NAGOORKUTTY RAWTHER, REHNA MANZIL, KOTTAYI., THENKURISSI - II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679104.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Saithoon Umma, an 82-year-old applicant, seeking a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to expeditiously conduct inquiry and dispose of suo motu S.M. No.157/2021 pending before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (Sections 72 and 72K, read with Rule 14). The tribunal had initiated suo motu proceedings based on a Village Officer’s report for assignment of right, title and interest vested in the Government and for issuance of a purchase certificate. The court notes substantial pendency in the Land Tribunal (11078 cases) and recalls a prior decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), which underscored the need for expeditious disposal while preserving seniority. The Narayanan Namboodiri judgment laid down seven directions to ensure timely disposal of cases, prioritizing senior citizens, allowing reports through Village Officers, and enforcing seniority-based disposal within set time frames. The present Court directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.157/2021 strictly in accordance with those directions, thereby balancing speed with due process, and concludes with no costs. The petition is thus disposed of.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of suo motu S.M.No.157/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. Citing the age and vulnerability (82 years) of the petitioner and the Court’s earlier guidance in Narayanan Namboodiri, the applicant urges prioritization of senior citizens’ cases and adherence to seniority-based disposal timelines. The petitioner also emphasizes the need for timely information flow and cooperation with the Land Tribunal to avoid delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent Government Pleader highlights the substantial overall pendency (10,078 cases) and contends that while expeditious disposal is desirable, the Land Tribunal must operate within the established framework and the time lines suggested by higher authorities. The respondent relies on procedural norms and the principle of not breaking seniority except as directed by the Court or higher authorities.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited as the controlling precedent for expeditious disposal and the seniority-based framework later adopted by the court in directing the Land Tribunal’s actions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Saithoon Umma v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottapalam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SAITHOON UMMA, AGED 82 YEARS D/O. NAGOORKUTTY RAWTHER, REHNA MANZIL, KOTTAYI., THENKURISSI - II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** ## **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.157/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0615 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.413/6 in Block No.20 of Thenkurissi-II Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the ## W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thenkurissi-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.157/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 03.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 82 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.157/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.157/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6876 OF 2021(H) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 03.02.2021.**