High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of directing Land Tribun...

Sainaba v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) and The Village Officer, Paruthur Village

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.8956 of 2021 (T)
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Justice Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-04-08
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.50/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (supra). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of directing Land Tribunal Pattambi to dispose of S.M.No.50/2021 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sainaba

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi, Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Palakkad District
  • The Village Officer, Paruthur Village, Pallippuram (P.O), Palakkad District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. P.T. Dinesh

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C.Vidhya - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus to compel the 1st respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.50/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 seek assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and the issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Rules, in respect of 16.29 acres in Sy.No.74/1-12-1 of Paruthur Village, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. The petition contends that expeditious disposal of applications pending before Land Tribunal is essential to enable purchasers (including for loan purposes) to obtain certificates and loans. The Court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases) which laid down directions for expeditious disposal, prioritising senior citizens and disposing cases on seniority within six to eighteen months, with flexibility to obtain reports through Village Officers. Pendency before the Land Tribunal is substantial (11078 suo motu cases). The Court directs the Land Tribunal, Pattambi to dispose of S.M.No.50/2021 strictly in accordance with the law and following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for expeditious disposal of the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, emphasizing the need to obtain purchase certificates promptly for loan purposes and to follow the seniority-based directions laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal of cases, including prioritising senior citizens and obtaining requisite reports to avoid delays. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the Land Tribunal to adjudicate S.M.No.50/2021 within a time frame consistent with the Court’s directions.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents’ counsel emphasizes the large pendency (approximately 11,078 suo motu cases), adherence to seniority and due process, and cooperation by the applicant in serving notices and obtaining necessary reports. They reference the need to follow established procedures, the Government order directing faster disposal, and the importance of not derailing the Tribunal’s proceedings by out-of-turn disposals.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe judgment relies on the directions given in Narayanan Namboodiri regarding expeditious disposal and seniority-based processing of land reform matters; the present case adopts those directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sainaba v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) and The Village Officer, Paruthur Village and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SAINABA, AGED 57 YEARS W/O.MOIDEEN KUTTY, RESIDING AT CHERIYERI HOUSE, NADAPARAMBU, KARAMBATHUR, PALLIPPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679305.** ## **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.DINESH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR)**| |---|---| ||**OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR)**| ||**PATTAMBI, MINI CIVIL STATION,**| ||**OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679104.**| |**2**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**PARUTHUR VILLAGE, PALLIPPURAM (P.O),**| ||**PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679305.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA -GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.50/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 16.29 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.74/1-12-1 of Paruthur Village, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) -6- directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Paruthur Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.50/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 13.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.50/2021 W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.50/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8956 OF 2021(T) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PART OF THE PARTITION DEED NO.3801/95 OF SRO THRITHALA DATED 06.11.1995.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 10.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARUTHUR.** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 13.01.2021 IN SM NO.50/21 BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), OTTAPPALAM.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.28398/2017 DATED 14.03.2018 ALONG WITH G.O(P)NO.09/2018/RD DATED 22.02.2018 WHICH IS PART OF THE JUDGMENT.**