High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions to th...

Sainaba v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-19
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.174/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to the Land Tribunal Pattambi to dispose of S.M.No.174/2019 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SAINABA, AGED 55 YEARS W/O.MOHAMMEDKUTTY AND D/O.LATE MOHAMMED MULLUR, VARYATHODI KARABATTA, CHOORAKODE POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336.

Respondents

  • THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), PATTAMBI, MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM-679104, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
  • VILLAGE OFFICER, VALLAPPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, VALLAPPUZHA POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.R.SREEHARI

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This Kerala High Court writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks a mandamus to direct the Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.174/2019 filed before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The Land Tribunal had initiated suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 0.2225 hectares in Re-Sy.No.6/1, Vallapuzha Village, Palakkad District. The petitioner is represented by counsel Srir. R. Sreehari; respondents are represented by the Senior Government Pleader. The Court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), noting its directions for expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases on seniority. It directs that where a writ petition seeks expeditious disposal, the Land Tribunal should follow the Narayanan Namboodiri framework (priority for senior citizens, six months for senior cases, eighteen months for others) and may obtain necessary reports through Village Officers as needed. The Government Order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (22.02.2018) is acknowledged as part of the framework. In result, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the Pattambi Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.174/2019 strictly in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases with priority to senior citizens, disposed on seniority basis (six months for senior-citizen cases, eighteen months for others).

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited and relied upon for expeditious disposal and for applying seniority-based directions in Land Tribunal proceedings.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sainaba v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SAINABA, AGED 55 YEARS W/O.MOHAMMEDKUTTY AND D/O.LATE MOHAMMED MULLUR, VARYATHODI KARABATTA, CHOORAKODE POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336.** ## **BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), PATTAMBI, MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM-679104, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 VILLAGE OFFICER, VALLAPPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, VALLAPPUZHA POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.174/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.2225 Hectares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.6/1 of Vallapuzha Village, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Vallapuzha Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.174/2019, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 04.12.2019, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.174/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.174/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7143 OF 2021(P) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **EXHIBIT P2** **PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 04.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. PHOTO COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C)NO.28398/2017 DATED 14.03.2018.** **EXHIBIT P3** **PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C)NO.1134/2021 DATED 18.01.2021.**