High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of (writ petition) with directions to ...

Sahira v. Land Tribunal (LR), Tirur & Special Tahsildar (LR), Tirur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-16
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.150/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (paragraph 2) and with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of (writ petition) with directions to dispose of S.M.No.150/2021 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and law; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SAHIRA, aged 34 years W/o. SHAFEER, Mayin Veettil House, Ezhuvathiruthi, Ponnani P.O, Malappuram District

Respondents

  • LAND TRIBUNAL (LAND REFORMS) TIRUR, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 101
  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LAND REFORMS) LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 101

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sr. Government Pleader Rekha C. Nair

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the delay in disposal of suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur, under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. Petitioner Sahira seeks a mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M. No.150/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a timeframe fixed by the Court. The judgment recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri line of authorities (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases) which emphasise seniority-based disposal, prioritising senior citizens, and expeditious processing with timelines (six months for senior citizen cases, up to 18 months for others) and the use of Village Officers/Revenue Inspectors to obtain reports. It notes the large pendency (4,987 suo motu proceedings) and concludes that the Land Tribunal should act in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions. Accordingly, the Court disposes the petition directing disposal of S.M.150/2021 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Senior citizens' cases to be disposed on seniority basis within six months (Narayanan Namboodiri)
  • All other cases to be disposed on seniority basis within the maximum outer limit of 18 months (Narayanan Namboodiri)
  • Do not break the seniority of cases except by directions of the Court or higher authorities (Narayanan Namboodiri)
  • If reports are delayed, Land Tribunal may obtain reports from Village Officers concerned (Narayanan Namboodiri)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases should be prioritized and done strictly in accordance with law (Narayanan Namboodiri)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner sought a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.150/2021 by the Land Tribunal, relying on the Narayanan Namboodiri directions for expeditious disposal and seniority-based processing, and highlighting the need to avoid delaying senior citizens’ rights.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents (through the Senior Government Pleader) emphasized the heavy pendency before the Land Tribunal (about 4,987 suo motu proceedings) and the necessity to adhere to established procedures, while acknowledging the Narayanan Namboodiri framework as a guiding principle for faster disposal within the statutory framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThe judgment explicitly follows and applies the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri, ensuring expeditious, seniority-based disposal of cases; the current court directs adherence to those standards.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sahira v. Land Tribunal (LR), Tirur & Special Tahsildar (LR), Tirur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SAHIRA, AGED 34 YEARS W/O. SHAFEER, MAYIN VEETTIL HOUSE, EZHUVATHIRUTHI, PONNANI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 LAND TRIBUNAL(LAND REFORMS) TIRUR, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 101 2 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LAND REFORMS) LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 101** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT REKHA C.NAIR- SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.150/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 4.226 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.258/1 of Ezhuvathiruthi Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Ezhuvathiruthi Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.150/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 certificate dated 23.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.150/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.150/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6671 OF 2021(H) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.F 2009 S.R DATED 23-01-2021 IN S.M NO. 150/2021 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT**