High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed with no order as to costs; Land Tribun...

Sahadevan v. Special Tahsildar (L.R.), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.R), Ottappalam, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-02
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.1583/2017 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed with no order as to costs; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M.1583/2017 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions and law.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sahadevan, aged 65 years S/o Velayudhan, Pindikde House, Perinkulam, Alathur Village, Alathur, Palakkad

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (L.R), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.R), Ottappalam, Palakkad 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri Sunil Nath N.B., Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus directing the respondent, the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottappalam, to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.1583/2017 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The suo motu proceeding was initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner, a 65-year-old senior citizen, contends dismissal by delay would adversely affect his rights and finances, especially as many petitioners press for loans. The court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), which emphasizes disposal of cases on seniority and prescribes orderly, expeditious procedures, including obtaining reports through Village Officers and prioritizing senior citizens. The court notes pendency in 2434 suo motu cases and directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.1583/2017 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, and with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority of registration principle for disposal of cases (seniority-based disposal)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases, especially senior citizens’ cases
  • Avoiding out-of-turn disposal and adhering to judicial directions for timely completion

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for an expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.1583/2017 before the Land Tribunal, emphasizing the petitioner’s senior citizen status (65 years) and urgency for funds/loan. He relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision and GO (P) No.09/2018/RD directing faster reports via Village Officers, and urges adherence to seniority-based disposal to prevent derailment of the process and to avoid indefinite delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent pleader concedes the need for expeditious disposal but emphasizes compliance with established seniority-based disposal and legal procedures. He points to the substantial pendency (2434 suo motu proceedings), the necessity of serving notices, and the possibility of obtaining reports from Village Officers to prevent delays. He supports following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions and insists on disposing cases in accordance with law without granting preference out of turn.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited as controlling precedent; the court adopts its paragraph 2 directions on expeditious disposal, seniority, and related procedures.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sahadevan v. Special Tahsildar (L.R.), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.R), Ottappalam, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 13TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SAHADEVAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O. VELAYUDHAN, PINDIKDE HOUSE, PERINKULAM, ALATHUR VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R), OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD 679 104** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SRI SUNIL NATH N.B-GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.1583/2017 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0405 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.Nos.165, 1, 2, 3 of Alathur Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -4- jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -5- cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -6- before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Alathur, the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1583/2017, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 19.07.2017, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -7- 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 65 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is 2434. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1583/2017 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.1583/2017, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2585 OF 2021(W) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 19-07-2017**