High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

RISHIKUMARAN v. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), OTTAPALAM

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-24
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.1607/2019 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • RISHIKUMARAN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. KANDAN, POTHENKAD, KUZHALMANNAM -II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD - 679104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1607/2019 pending before the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Rules, in respect of 0.0144 hectares of land in Re.Sy.No.388/4, Block No.15, Kuzhalmannam-II Village, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad district. The petitioner contends the delay in disposal and seeks expeditious resolution of the matter. The Court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and notes directives for expeditious disposal based on seniority, and the role of Village Officers in obtaining reports under GO directions. Pendency before the Land Tribunal is substantial (2434 cases). The Court ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to proceed with S.M.No.1607/2019 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, and disposes the petition with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by Land Tribunal on seniority basis
  • Priority to senior citizens in disposal of cases
  • Land Tribunal shall dispose cases following seniority and not break it except as directed by Court or higher authority
  • Utilization of Village Officers to obtain reports to expedite matters (GO 2018)
  • Two-month/within-six-month/within-eighteen-month timetables for disposition of ripe and non-ripe matters as per Narayanan Namboodiri judgment

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1607/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, and to dispose of the matter with due expedition in accordance with law; the petition referenced the need for prompt resolutions and highlighted the backlog and procedural steps under the Kerala Land Reforms Act and Rules.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent was represented by the Government Pleader; the court’s decision indicates reliance on established directions (Narayanan Namboodiri) and the GOV order to expedite matters; the detailed submissions aren’t restated in the judgment excerpt, but the Court’s directions reflect adherence to due process and seniority-based disposal.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another—PositiveCited as the controlling authority establishing directions for expeditious disposal and seniority-based adjudication to be followed by the Land Tribunal.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against RISHIKUMARAN v. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), OTTAPALAM and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **RISHIKUMARAN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. KANDAN, POTHENKAD, KUZHALMANNAM -II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD - 679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT A.C VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1607/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0144 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.388/4 in Block No.15 of Kuzhalmannam-II Village in Alathur Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kuzhalmannam-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1607/2019, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 29.08.2019, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is 2434. W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1607/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.1607/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7618 OF 2021(B) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 29.08.2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT**