RFA Nos. 290/2017, 295/2017, 296/2017 and 297/2017, IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Sathish Ninan
- Judgment Date
- 2023-08-11
- Court Decision / Holding
- Parties have settled their dispute out of court. A joint memo has been filed to the said effect. The appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. In the light of Noorudheen V. Muhammed Najmal and Mithun T. Abraham, the entire court fee paid on the Memorandum of Appeal without deductions shall be refunded to the appellants.
- Final Disposition
- Appeals dismissed as withdrawn; matter settled out of court; court-fee refunds determined by cited authorities.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- M-FAR Eco Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd.
- Kumili Valley Eco Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd.
- Kumili Mist Resorts (India) Private Ltd.
- M-Far Elite Resorts (India) Private Ltd.
Respondents
- Aleyamma Jacob W/o P.A.Jacob, Padinjattatharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Abraham Jacob S/o P.A.Jacob, Padinjattatharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Thomas Jacob S/o P.A.Jacob, Padinjattatharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Joseph Jacob S/o P.A.Jacob, Padinjattatharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Aby Mathew, S/o P.A.Mathew, Padinjattatharayaril PallIyampil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Binu K. Mathew S/o P.A.Mathew, Padinjattatharayaril PallIyampil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Leemol Binu W/o Binu K. Mathew, Padinjjattatharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- K.A. Abraham S/o Abraham, Padinjattharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Valsamma Abraham W/o K.A. Abraham, Padinajattatharayaril Panachayil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Chinnu Aby W/o Aby Mathew, Padinattatharayaril Palliyampil House, West Othara P.O., 689106, Tiruvalla
- Jabu Abraham S/o K.A. Abraham, Kannankeril House, Kuttoormuri, Kuttoor Village/PO: 689106, Tiruvalla
- Fr.T.T.Abraham S/o Thomas, Thottupurathu House, Vampala Muri, Kuttoomuri P.O, 689106, Tiruvalla
- Jab u Abraham S/o K.A. Abraham
- Fr.T.T.Abraham (duplicate)
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • K.G. Balasubramanian
- • Ambily Premkumar
Counsels for Respondents
- • N. James Koshy
Case Synopsis & Summary
These Regular First Appeals were filed by four resort developers challenging separate judgments of the Sub Court, Kattappana, in OS Nos. 161–164/2008. The High Court consolidated the four appeals (RFA Nos. 290/2017, 295/2017, 296/2017 and 297/2017) and heard them on 11 August 2023, along with connected cases. On the same day, the parties filed a joint memo indicating that the disputes had been settled out of court, and the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn. The judgment records the decision as a procedural resolution rather than a merits adjudication, emphasizing the out-of-court settlement between the parties and the withdrawal of the appeals. The court cites Noorudheen V. Muhammed Najmal (2021) 4 KHC 257 and Mithun T. Abraham v. Sub-Court of Judicature, Kottayam and Others (ILR 2022(2) Ker. 699) to justify refund of the entire court fee paid on the Memorandum of Appeal without deductions. The appellants include M-FAR Eco Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd.; Kumili Valley Eco Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd.; Kumili Mist Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd.; and M-FAR Elite Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd. Respondents comprise various individuals named in the original suits, with representation by counsel noted in the record. The judgment is delivered by Justice Sathish Ninan and records a withdrawal-based disposition.
Cited Precedents (2)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noorudheen V. Muhammed Najmal | 2021(4) KHC 257 | Positive | Cited to support the refund of court fee upon withdrawal/out-of-court settlement. |
| Mithun T. Abraham v. Sub-Court of Judicature, Kottayam and Others | ILR 2022(2)Ker.699 | Positive | Cited to support the refund of court fee upon withdrawal/out-of-court settlement. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against RFA Nos. 290/2017, 295/2017, 296/2017 and 297/2017, IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.