High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeBail granted; accused REGHUNATH P. MENON releas...

REGHUNATH P. MENON v. STATE OF KERALA

Case / Petition Number:10151 of 2023
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S. Dias
Judgment Date
2024-01-05
Court Decision / Holding
The application is allowed. Bail granted on a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two solvent sureties for equal amount, subject to conditions: (i) periodic appearance before the IO every alternate Saturday for two months or until final report; (ii) no inducement or tampering with witnesses; (iii) no commission of offences while on bail; (iv) surrender of passport or affidavit of non-availability; (v) disclosure of present/permanent address and mobile number; (vi) possible cancellation or modification of bail by the court for violations; (vii) IO may carry out investigations and recoveries even while on bail, as supported by Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another.
Final Disposition
Bail granted; accused REGHUNATH P. MENON released on bail with specific conditions.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • REGHUNATH P. MENON

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala
  • Station House Officer, Kunnamkulam Police Station, Thrissur District
  • Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch, EOW, Thrissur

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • M.P. Vijayan

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. Neema T.V. (Senior Public Prosecutor)

Case Synopsis & Summary

REGHUNATH P. MENON, the sixth accused in Crime No. 22/2023 of Kunnamkulam Police Station, Thrissur, approached the Kerala High Court seeking bail under Section 439 CrPC. The prosecution alleges offences under IPC Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) and under the BUDS Act, 2019 (Sections 3 read with 21 and 5 read with 23). The accused were directors of Safe and Strong Business Consultancy Private Ltd.; deposits of Rs. 7,00,000 from the defacto complainant and Rs. 1,00,000 from her husband were allegedly received and not repaid. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 9 October 2023. The Public Prosecutor opposed bail, noting forty cases against the petitioner and the ongoing Crime Branch investigation, with a writ petition seeking transfer to the CBI, arguing that bail would hamper the investigation. The petitioner contended innocence and lack of direct involvement in deposit activities, claiming false implication and arguing for statutory bail given the length of custody. After careful consideration, the court found continued detention unnecessary and granted bail. The order requires bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, and imposes conditions including regular appearance, non-tampering with witnesses or evidence, prohibition on offences while on bail, surrender/presenting addresses, and potential bail cancellation for violations, while noting a guiding principle from Sushila Aggarwal regarding continued investigation on bail.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 439 of CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code, 1973)Sections 406 and 420 of IPC (Indian Penal Code)Section 3 read with Section 21 of the BUDS Act, 2019Section 5 read with Section 23 of the BUDS Act, 2019

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another (2020 (1) KHC 663) – doctrine allowing continued investigation and recoveries while bail is in force.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends absolute innocence and lacks any direct involvement in receiving deposits. He asserts false implication and emphasizes the lengthy custody since 9 October 2023, arguing entitlement to statutory bail by 9 January 2024. He highlights his willingness to cooperate with the investigation and his family/community ties, urging the court to grant bail with appropriate conditions to ensure attendance and non-interference with the inquiry.

Contentions of Respondents

The Public Prosecutor opposes bail, pointing to around forty cases against the petitioner and ongoing Crime Branch investigation. A writ petition seeking transfer to the CBI is pending, and releasing the petitioner could hamper the investigation. The prosecution urges stringent conditions to prevent tampering with witnesses and evidence and to ensure supervisory oversight while the investigation continues.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another2020 (1) KHC 663PositiveCited as authority for the proposition that investigations and recoveries may proceed even when a person is on bail, guiding the court's approach to ongoing inquiry.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against REGHUNATH P. MENON v. STATE OF KERALA and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

1 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 15TH POUSHA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 10151 OF 2023 ``` ``` CRIME NO.22/2023 OF Kunnamkulam Police Station, Thrissur ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` REGHUNATH.P.MENON, AGED 36 YEARS S/O SIVASANKARA MENON, SIVAKALA, CHEMBULLY ROAD, KANNIAMAPURAM, OTTAPPALAM,PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 679104 ``` ``` BY ADV M.P.VIJAYAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680001 3THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH,EOW,THRISSUR AYYAHOLE,THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680003 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` SMT.NEEMA T.V SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ``` ``` THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 2 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 ## **C.S.DIAS,J** ## **======================** **Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 ----------------------------------Dated this the 5[th] day of January, 2024** ## **O R D E R** The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the sixth accused in Crime No.22/2023 of the Kunnamkulam Police Station, Thrissur, registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Secs.406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sec.3 read with Sec.21 and Sec.5 read with Sec.23 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (BUDS Act). The petitioner was arrested on 9.10.2023. 3 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 2. The prosecution case is that the accused 1 to 6 were Directors of a company named, Safe and Strong Business Consultancy Private Ltd. They have violated the provisions of the BUDS Act by receiving an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- from the defacto complainant and Rs.1,00,000/- from her husband and, thereafter, cheated them by not repaying the said amount. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences. 3. Heard; Sri.M.P.Vijayan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Neema T.V. the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. 4 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent of the accusations levelled against him. He has no direct involvement in receiving the deposits from the defacto complainant. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the crime. At any rate, the petitioner has been in judicial custody for the last more than eighty nine days. The petitioner is, at any rate, entitled to be released on statutory bail on 9.1.2024. Hence the application may be allowed. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application and submitted that there are forty cases registered against the petitioner and the other Directors of the company. The investigation is not complete. She also submitted that the present investigation is 5 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 being conducted by the Crime Branch. There is a writ petition filed before this Court to transfer the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation. Therefore, letting off the petitioner on bail at this stage would hamper the investigation. Hence, the application may be dismissed. 6. After bestowing my anxious consideration to the materials placed on record, particularly taking note of the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 9.10.2023 and his further detention is unnecessary, I am of the definite view that the petitioner is to be released on bail. In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh 6 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every alternate Saturday between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m for a period of two months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; 7 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; (iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail; (v) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond; 8 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 (vi) The petitioner shall furnish his present address as well as his permanent address and mobile phone number to the court below and the Investigating Officer. (vii) In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law. Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below. (viii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the 9 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another** [2020 (1) KHC 663]. SD/- sks/5.1.2024 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE 10 Bail Application No. 10151 of 2023 ## **`APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 10151/2023`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES ``` ``` Annexure A1ANNEXURE A1 - ORDER IN CRL.M.C. NO.5448/2023 DATED 21-10-2023 ON THE FILE OF THIRD ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT TRISSUR. Annexure A2TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16- 12-2019 BETWEEN THE FIRST ACCUSED AND THE PETITIONER ```