High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; No order as to costs.

Rasiya v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi and Village Officer, Moonniyur Village, Malappuram District

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-31
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.185/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Rasiya

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, Malappuram District
  • The Village Officer, Moonniyur Village, Malappuram District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. P.T. Sheejish

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smti A.C. Vidya, Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Rasiya, a resident of Moonniyur in Malappuram District, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct the 1st respondent, the Special Tahsildar (LR), to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.185/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, regarding assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, in respect of 21.27 Ares of Re.Sy.No.277/8 in Moonniyur Village. The matter arises from suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the said Rules. The petition recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) decision, which held that tribunals must dispose cases on seniority, avoid out-of-turn progress, and may obtain reports via Village Officers if needed, prioritizing senior citizens and ensuring expeditious disposal within defined timeframes. Considering the pendency (2192 cases) at Tirurangadi, the court directs the Land Tribunal to decide S.M.185/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, and disposes of the petition with no costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India - Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by the Land Tribunal on the basis of seniority
  • Do not break the seniority of pending cases; disposal should follow the registration seniority
  • Priority for disposal of cases filed by senior citizens
  • Utilization of Village Officers to obtain information/reports to expedite proceedings
  • Suo motu proceedings under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for assignment of land to the Government

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for a mandamus directing expeditious consideration and adjudication of S.M.No.185/2021 on the Land Tribunal's file, to implement the right to purchase under Sections 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, and to issue a certificate of purchase; the writ seeks timely protection against delay, citing the need for purchase certificates for loan purposes and ensuring adherence to the established framework and seniority rules.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent-pleader (Government Pleader) submits that disposal must be in strict accordance with law and in line with the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri; emphasis is placed on adherence to seniority, obtaining necessary reports (including via Village Officers), and ensuring expeditious disposal particularly for senior-citizen cases, while maintaining due process and prior directions.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling precedent establishing expeditious disposal guidelines and seniority-based disposal; directs tribunals to follow these directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Rasiya v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi and Village Officer, Moonniyur Village, Malappuram District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** |||**RASIYA, AGED 51 YEARS**| |---|---|---| |||**W/O. ABDURAHIMAN, KALARIKKAL, KANNADI,**| |||**THAYYILAKKADAVU, MOONNIYUR, VELIMUKKU,**| |||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN -676 317.**| |||**BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH**| |**RESPONDENT/S**<br>**:**||| |**1**||**THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LR)**| |||**LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRURANGADI,**| |||**TIRURANGADI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,**| |||**KERALA 676 306.**| |**2**||**THE VILLAGE OFFICER,**| |||**MOONNIYUR VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,**| |||**KERALA, PIN-673 634.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.185/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the PGovernment under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 21.27 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.277/8 of Moonniyur Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Moonniyur Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.185/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P2 certificate dated 16.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi is 2192. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi can be directed to dispose of W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -7- S.M.No.185/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.185/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8560 OF 2021(T) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.01.2021.** **EXHIBIT P2** **THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OS SUOMOTU PROCEEDINGS IN SM NO. 185/2021 DATED 16.02.2021.**