Raman v. Paru and others

Case Details & Bench

Court: High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges: P. Somarajan
Judgment Date: 2022-01-11
Court Decision / Holding: The appeal is disposed of in accordance with the compromise arrived at by the parties. The compromise will form part of the judgment and decree. Refund the entire court fee in view of the legal position settled by the Apex Court in the cited decision (2021 KHC Online 6080, ILR 2021 (1) Ker. 956, 2021 (2) KLT SN 25, SCC 560).
Final Disposition: Appeal disposed of by compromise; decree to be drawn in terms of the compromise; compromise to form part of judgment; court to refund court fees.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

Raman

Respondents

Paru
Padmavathy (deceased)
Sarojini
Manikandan
Savithri
Ramakrishnan
Subhadhra
Madhavi
Komalam
Suresh
Latha
Preetha
Velukurty
Vijayan
Sudha

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

• P.G. Parameswari Panicker (Senior Advocate)
• Satheep Ankarath

Counsels for Respondents

• Preethi Harunararan
• M.R. Mini Meena
• A.R. Rajesh
• Kormath V. S. Robin

Case Synopsis & Summary

This case is an appeal under A.S. No. 269 of 2003 before the Kerala High Court at Ernakulam, challenging the judgment and decree in O.S. 89/1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ottapalam, dated 5 October 2002. The appellant Raman sought partition of ancestral properties and related relief against multiple respondents, including Paru, Padmavathy (deceased), Sarojini, Manikandan, Savithri, Ramakrishnan, Subhadhra, Madhavi, Komalam, Suresh, Latha, Preetha, Velukurty, Vijayan, and Sudha, along with other legal heirs of the deceased. The matter appeared to hinge on how the properties were to be partitioned and which family members would hold specific parcels. During the course of proceedings, the parties arrived at a comprehensive out‑of‑court settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The Joint Compromise Petition records that only six properties are to be partitioned, with Madhavi receiving exclusive title to certain parcels and Paru and the heirs of Padmavathy to receive others in fixed shares. It also preserves a portion of property for common use and allows mutation of titles before authorities. On 11 January 2022, the High Court accepted the compromise, disposed of the appeal in terms of the compromise, and ordered refund of court fees in light of a Supreme Court position cited in the order. It records that possession has already been taken and confirms that there are no further cross-claims; the decree will be drawn accordingly and the compromise will form part of the judgment.

Provisions of Law Cited

Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The appellant Raman and his counsel advocated acceptance of the out‑of‑court compromise and urged the court to record the terms of the compromise as the decree in accordance with the settlement, noting that the six properties to be partitioned and the exclusive rights allocated to Madhavi, with Paru and the heirs of Padmavathy allotted the remaining properties, would bring finality to long‑standing family disputes. The arrangement also contemplates mutation before revenue authorities and confirms possession has already been taken, limiting further disputes. Respondents concurred with the compromise, emphasizing that the settlement avoids protracted litigation, ensures peace among family members, and should be recorded as a decree implementing the partition as agreed, including the allocation to Madhavi and the joint shares for Paru and Padmavathy’s heirs.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents joined in the compromise and supported final settlement, accepting six parcels for partition, Madhavi’s exclusive rights to specific parcels, and the division of other properties among Paru and Padmavathy’s legal heirs. They asserted that recording the compromise and issuing a decree would finalize the dispute, avoid further litigation, and facilitate mutating titles before authorities. They stressed the importance of ensuring clear titles and possessory rights for all parties and that the decree reflect the terms of compromise plus the preservation of a common‑use area and cremation ground where applicable.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case Name	Citation	Treatment	Explanation
Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M. C. Subramaniam and Others	2021 KHC Online 6080; ILR 2021 (1) Ker. 956; 2021 (2) KLT SN 25; SCC 560	Positive	Cited to support the principle that courts may record a compromise and grant a decree in terms of settlement; used here to justify accepting an out‑of‑court settlement and refunding court fees.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# IN THE HIGH COURT 0F KERALA AT ERNAKULAM # PRESENT # THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE llTH DAY 0F JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943 As NO. 269 OF zro03 ## AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED ®5.1®.20®2 IN OS 89/1996 0F SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM ## APPELLANT/DEFENDANT NO.1 : ## RAMAN S/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU, THRIKKIDEERI AMSOM, KUTTIKODE DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. ## P.G. PARAMESWAIIA PANICKER (SR. ) SAl\lTHEEP ANKARATH ## RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIF=FS AND DEFENDAI\lTS NO.3 T012: ## PARU ## D/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU, RESIDING AT PARANGOTTIL HOUSE PERUR AMSOM, ARALUR DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. ## PADMAVATHY D/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU, RESIDING AT PULII(KAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKKAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. (DIED) (LRS IMPLEADED) ## SAROJINI ## W/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU 'S SON PARANGODAN. ## MANIRANDAlu, ## S/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL PARANGODAN. ## SAVITHRI, ## D/O. LATE PARANGODAN. ## 6 RAMAKRISHNAN AS NO. 269 0F 2003 2 ## S/0. LATE PARANGODAN. ## SUBHADHRA, D/0. LATE PARANGODAN. ## MADHAVI D/0.CHUZHALIYIL VELU, KOMALAM, W/0 . NARAYANAN - 1® SURESH S/0 . NARAYANAN - 11 LATHA, D/O . NARAYANAN - 12 PREETHA, D/O . NARAYANAN , (RESPONDENTS NO.3 T012 RESIDING AT THRIKKADEERI AMSOM, KUTTIKODE DESOM IN 0TTAPALAM TALUK. ) ## ADDL.13 VELUKUTTY, - S/O. LATE PADMAVATHY, AGED 46 YEARS, PULIKRAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKRAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPLAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN- 679503. ## ADDL.14 VIJAYAN S/O . LATE PADMAVATHY, AGED 43 YEARS, PULIKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKKAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPLAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679503. ## ADDL.15 SUDHA ## D/O. LATE PADMAVATHY, AGED 48 YEARS, PULIKRAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKKAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, AS NO. 269 0F 2003 3 0TTAPLAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN- 679503. (LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE 0F DECEASED 2ND RESPONDENT ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDTIONAL RESPONDENTS 13 T0 15 AS PER ORDER DATED 11.®1.2®22 IN IA.NO.2/2®21) R1, ADDL.R13 T015 BY ADVS. PREETl+Y IIARUNARARAN M.R.MINI MEENA . A . R. RAJESH KORMATH V . S . ROBIN THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING 0N 11.®1.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING : AS NO. 269 0F 2003 ## ELDGMENI The matter is settled out of court between the parties. The compromise arrived at by the parties is hence accepted. The Appeal is disposed of in accordance with the compromise arrived at by the parties. The compromise arrived at by the parties will form part of the judgment and decree. Refund the entire court fee in view of legal position settled by the Apex Court in 7lhe #jgh Court Of Judicature at Hadras rep. by its Registrar General v. M.C. Subramaniam and Others t2®21 (2) KHC 62 : 2021 KHC Online 6080 : ILR 2021 (1) Ker.956 : 2021 (2) KLT SN 25 : 2021 (3) SCC 560] ' Sd/- P . SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV rl ## BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM > I.A. NO. 2021 In ## AS NO. 269 0F 2003 ## Against Judgment and decree in O.S. No. 89 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Ottapalam dated 5,10.2002 **==> picture [72 x 25] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** c(#;?"r **----- End of picture text -----** ## PETITIONEFl/ ADDellant:- Raman, aged 70 years, S/o. late Chuzhaliyil Velu, Thrikkideeri P.O., Kuttikode desom, Ottapalam Taluk. Vs. ## RESPONDEN-rs/ Respondents:- ## 1. Pamu, D/o. Late Chuzhaliyil Velu, Residing at Parangottil House, Perur amsom, Akalur Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. rl ## 2. Padmavathy (died) PAN.4al` f ea)CIA &7 P42" . -u3rb q SAP_DJgN 2 ` _9L* m4MR4ND4W` GL `i! k`i grfvl7+ip:i 24m4k2zj#Jivdrty ` RAfuL~ suBHfrDHp--+ ` LD9Er m4DH4vZ C2/ulLLG~7_ **==> picture [240 x 228] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** kofl.4LAN`L ee5jf252:9 _ jupE6tl tr LAlr,A. ` L ))REf7+/4` Pcr€et±+a qL v6LURATTY. JLJ£V2~ vz7Aval ~sOJf a 3uD,j4. "u`Tltr **----- End of picture text -----** 3. Sarojini, W/o. late Chuzhaliyil Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. 4. Manikandan, S/o. late Chuzhaliyil Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. ## 5. Savithrj, **==> picture [15 x 16] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** a **----- End of picture text -----** D/o. late Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. ## 6. Ramakrishnan, S/o. late Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. ## 7. Subhadhra, D/o. late Parangodan, Thrjkkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, n Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. **==> picture [528 x 291] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** kom4L4tyi 1 ae'c}gr - i feAynfr` Q]c2ed dr ..!:,.... pA2." < r-)r\ q 5LJPE£Hr L_ Air, 4 ` Let i AP-C,I .a N`I ` Prrt4tLa fr p pe.a " ` y\4N`ZkANDAN \/GLukdiY JJi- j4vz7dfz 4fl cTul¢ ¢„4k2zJ"ty`fu vz]Ay4ri. 3uDflADHPA` ha j c/D " 4 nd,ul.-Th „„„ c2,cJ@-gr **----- End of picture text -----** ## 8. Madhavi, D/o. Late Chuzhaliyil Velu, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. ## 9. Komalam, W/o. Narayanan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. 10, Suresh, S/o. Narayanan, **==> picture [15 x 14] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** n **----- End of picture text -----** Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. ## 11. Latha, D/o. Narayanan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. ## 12. Preetha, D/o. Narayanan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. **==> picture [540 x 247] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** rl PAmAy` ®)I 2irA \©r koN.4L4M. a®)c293© T== pARLri -i,ng.@ 5up€3Ho hi 54„::::DAri=`G± L4fH4, ,,' tr ppg6TH4 , ``Prveedlco Q* 54vzTrip-Z ` ffty v£Lu^ufir` . _rL± 2„4k2.23„`4rf . aArfuL v8j4y4N`,c~riv{2ng suj3HADHR4` ky 5C,DnA ` mdLJ 14- **----- End of picture text -----** **==> picture [208 x 14] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** m4j)„4v? ` c2nuo`@L -@~ **----- End of picture text -----** ## LEGAL HElirs OF 2ND REsroNDENT:- 13. velukurty, - S/o. late Padmavathy, aged 46 years, Pulikkaparambil House, Adakkaputhur amsom and desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, Pin -679503. 14. Vijayan, - S/o. late Padmavathy, aged 43 years, Pulikkaparambil House, Adakkaputhur amsom and desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, **==> picture [16 x 17] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** rl **----- End of picture text -----** - Pin -679503. 15. Sudha, - D/o, late Padmavathy, aged 48 years, - Pulikkaparambil House, Adakkaputhur amsom and desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, Pin - 679503. ## JOINT COMPROMISE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIE UNDER ORDER 23 RULE 3 0F THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUIRE ## 0 1. The above appeal is preferred against the Judgment and decree in O.S, No. 89 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Ottapalam dated 5.10.2002. The suit was filed by respondents 1 koiv`ALAM` G=&)C>-Ci4= L 24m4„ ©/@ul`®H pAPu. -"n` en\: 3Ap!oJZNr. ^C2Z339 \`:_, f rrfu N -I k4 ^i D 4N , sAv2Th p9 ` F\3f ty p4inAkRZ5HN4ul ` Put L5uB#4D£4 ` L4~ „4D04vz , c29ulall EL ::::£4A Le~ 4Z~ ::;::uHT47`y P+eth# vzJArAti` . =\\`,,-:; I 3uDH4 ` cylbLj-~cra~ rt and 2 in the appeal namely Paru and Padmavathy for partition of the plaint schedule properties. The suit was decreed and it was held that the plaintiffs are entitled 2 out of 6 shares. Defendants 1, 2 and 8 are entitled to 1 out of 6 shares each and defendants 3 to 7 were held to be entitled to 1 out of 6 shares. 2. Appeal is preferred by the lst defendant in the suit. Pending appeal 2nd respondent in the suit namely Padmavathy whose legal heirs impleadedasrespondents.../3,.'.?..T.e..8..tF 3. Pending appeal the matter was discussed and deliberated through family members and common friends and parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. As per the settlement it has been decided as follows:- 1. It is decided that the properties available for partition as per settlement are only six in numbers. 2. 8th respondent in the appeal namely Madhavi who is the 8th defendant in the suit is entitled to exclusive title and possession over the following properties:- •p„4^;, ra;®rnd a~ **==> picture [230 x 44] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** pap.u ..-, a 6xp` 6n4::J::::DAN` Cys8 GL **----- End of picture text -----** 5Av27`riRZ \ 4L P4y)AIt223W¢N \ q2M+ 5utgiv4J>ZJ24 ` b2~ rvIeDtdavi isea,ul®1 gr ::::£4H ftyLpp6€TH4 prcctL`~G3_ \,£LUKcf7" fuap;~ vz3Ay4N c_ra# 5cij>W4 nquIT JtL #,i €&)C259L± =L (A) 29.4 cents (0.1190 hectares) in Re-Survey No. 153/2 (88/2 old sy.) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village in Ottapalam Taluk. (8) 8.15 cents (0.0330 hectares) in the property named as Thara Palliyal which is situated in Re-survey No. 148/7 (old sy. 49/4 part) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village. r, 3. plaintiffs namely Paru and Padmavathy had decided to join together and hence shares to be allotted to Paru and legal heirs of deceased Padmavathy are kept commonly, Paru and Padmavathy are allotted the following properties with full ownership and possession: - A. 57 cents (0.2305 hectares) namely Valiyakandam (Vattamkandam) in Re-survey No. 152/15 (88/10) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village. - a. 10 cents (0.0405 hectares) namely Chuzhaliyil Kudiyiruppa in Re-Survey No. 169/2 Pt (old Survey No. 90/4) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village. ® 24M4ly` a, cbul .dr p4Ac'. -)a & 5:::::;4riev# 34v27r,jp`2. I f pALM4kp23HN4N RAM_ GCJbF)4DHP4 L_ „4D+j4vz a)Luou`ap~ kc>m4LW €SitQ>92f T= ::TP:4" , Zfty,er_ ppBE7`H4 Fir&th&fafLe V6LUKulTy ` vzf^yAri.rselse f"DW4 t mdu;~q8L` - C. 11.60 cents (0.0470 hectares) namely Tharaparamba in Re-Survey No. 151/8 (Old Sy. No. 87/28 Part) in Thrikkadeeri 11 Village. **==> picture [16 x 17] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** rl **----- End of picture text -----** 4. Properties are described in more detail in the schedule attached to this compromise. It is also decided that apart from the aforementioned properties the remaining properties included in Partition Deed No. 163/1976 which is marked as Exhibit 87 will be retained, possessed and owned by the parties to the documents in the same manner as alleged in the partition deed. It is also agreed that the lst plaintiff and legal heirs of the 2nd plaintiff to whom 11.60 cents of property in Re-Survey No. 151/8 (old Sy. No. 87/128) named Tharaparamb is set apart will not obstruct the appellant from using the 6ft. wide way on the western side of the said 11.60 cents lying in north -south direction leading from Tharakulam pathway till the properties of the appellant. **==> picture [293 x 279] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** 24M4V' ©,at , car n ct-,, nc. Ggr p 4 P i, ` £4P=DJ Ziv 2 . |V\A }`r Z kA N ID4 N 5A\,2Tf+pz,e~9~ /P4m kp2G#jw~ -- P4nz;~ 5Ltj3++`J)„¢4. L4in fr\4D n AIV 2 cislulqul&i, **----- End of picture text -----** **==> picture [231 x 227] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** k`om4L4M tg®J92o`f= 6upE3" EL- L.4+F+A ` LQ~ pp6€TH4 ` Per±-& \,6LUKUT`ryt-rtygL_ VZJAY4N , 5Ltj>H4 ` rviuo, Sky- **----- End of picture text -----** **==> picture [29 x 17] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** iiE **----- End of picture text -----** n 5. Parties hereby agreed that the properties set apart to sharers have already been taken possession of the shares of the sharers to whom properties are allotted and they have no claim against each other. It is also agreed that there are no 'other properties kept in common between the parties except five cents of property which is used as cremation ground. Parties have no claim each other henceforth. r) 6. It is also agreed that parties can apply for mutating the properties allotted to their respective shares before revenue authorities or local authority and enjoy the properties as their Own. Hence it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise and pass a decree in accordance with the compromise. **==> picture [534 x 271] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** twiv)¢L4N` 8SS9C2923. `= 24„4„ `@;9wl tr 3;::: f f lzr±, p4tu` c-\rb ap\ s4PJOJ2,rJ2 ` pp€£ 7~ - fl+e4Lh^ C~ M.4NPK-4ND4N c v£L„7„,.~ru\2~, 5Av27HP2 ` 9292= v2JAy4N ` i\nd,.a R 4,nA kQ23f f NAN ` ptry / 6uJ)F,A ` Thul A cJlor- GUBH4DHP4 ` lrfu_ M4Dr/Aiv2 ` a,LJ@: Qz- **----- End of picture text -----** The contents of the statement were read over and explained to both the parties and both of them understood the same and statement is signed before the Advocates on both sides at Ernakulam on this the|q-Aay of /o€cemB€ngo21. **==> picture [16 x 15] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** n **----- End of picture text -----** ## APPELLANT RAMAN ` cai2)rv6` 82~ ## RESPONDENTS - R1. PARU r-1 rtJR R3. SAROJINI r , R4. MANIKANDAN I/i-£1--. R5. SAVITHRI La:a± - R6. RAMAKRISHNAN P4pr1- - R7. SUBHADHRA I Lfty - R8. MADHAv[ , a,ulctll`gr - R9. KOMALj" ` cse,j>Qi 92JQ `r3L - R10. SURESH -`grf Rii. LATHA S Lfro ® - Ri2. PREETHA pitcefroc=_ RL3. vELUKu" -frgr - R14. VIJAYAN . •-.-T,".`+. Ll R[5. SUDHA , "L^,.Tin ## Signed before me: ANKARATH :=epfa: COUNSEL FOR THE A£Ei#2N2(ql REEEEii= ## COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS e*ef 2i Gi besIN wvaAQ~puf ro tr<i®sQvh3 VILLAGE /:qHRIKKAI)EERI 11 BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :152/15 AREA : 0.2305cO CHNT :57 ## PARAMBATTUTHODI PARVATHY ## VELLACHAL P4N`qN,raDQ)di.cBPAP-a[• cJ )rb. g2.] 64PJOJr2rJ2 ` C335 N`4rl2k4ND4fy. C5)_ 6Avp7-i,R®L . oeEL ¢AyIAvf i:23HriA/ c q~ GOBF14Dl)P4 -`fty m4j>H4\zZ . LgivnJl-fry fc,in.4L~ , GQi.c2gro z~ 5ut.esH . fty LArTrJA PPEETHA . qt±hfu` tr. v£LUKu.7Ty.LTEL v27AyArd\rINIINQr 6#DH4 . rvThli)h~`4 **==> picture [16 x 15] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** n **----- End of picture text -----** VILLAGE :THRIKKADEERI II BLOCK :57 REl.SY.NO :151/8 pt AREA : 0.0470(H) CENT :11.60 ## PATH WAY 21.9 24rtyMiv.®JQ]wl`&r p4 A C, . -J ) ^c,, f&, 6Arpro72N7!. Ir\4 N2 I-4N D 4 ftl 34v2THP-P. . A ## CHUZHALIYIL RAMAN haz- #4rty..4keqL5»"4/ ` gAin+ L4rH4 €c^4;7;jDJ7?¢ I lEL ppGGC7H4 -Ffylefa/-A4. 4L LomqLon.G83)CA62±e=v2j-Ayat.q~=\Qr` Sup,L6H f t~ 5uDl]4` r"u-EL /2- **==> picture [16 x 17] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** a **----- End of picture text -----** VILLAGE :THRIKKADEERI II BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :169/2 pt AREA : 0.0405cO CENT : 10 ## CHUZHALIYIL KANNAPPANUNNI 23.5 ## PATH WAY P4m4KP25#"4„ c T2Agiv P-L4-MAN . G\)Qul 8}¥ sL,Ohj4j>it„ Lef~ P4P_u ` Gu) Q` CBL m49,ty¢v2 . cafuca. GxpzL~ 5A9P-ojltw.2 ` . QP9L `|co v.a L-4un ` efro 2 C±q29 Z~ n4N2y_4riD4ri -er s4vz7-»P2 . eg2: 6up`€3H ` f tyz¥ 44`TL}4 ` L± pp6E TH4 .pri2ddetr vGL4tKu77y. =EL vz3Arf yri -_st± £tlDFj4 . ryndLul -. iAtry **==> picture [171 x 87] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** VILLAGE :TIIRIKKADEERI II BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :153/12 AREA :0.1190® CENT : 29.4 **----- End of picture text -----** **==> picture [7 x 3] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** 13Jl **----- End of picture text -----** **==> picture [218 x 221] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** :u;;yHiRAi#i#gr ¢4 N.a N -u, r! . rd& P4,P-u 34hoJ2N2 . M4-N2P~4*D4f! 54V.,IT#P2 P4nc]Lp.zsi)N¢wl . r2A~ su3#QDHP4 ' (±2ir3zfa€ **----- End of picture text -----** **==> picture [262 x 217] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----** "4j,r74y2. G}julna.fry p_Oiy`QL4m . eesqug2> =2~ £u P€£ f/ L;:::7FJ4 . ,_±. v£ Lct j<c/77 y ` ±j+2~ v2j4yal e _¥f a suDH4 ` "LJ3` ~£g- **----- End of picture text -----** ## ' ## VILLAGE TTHRIKKADEERIII BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :148/7 AREA :0.0330® CHNT :8.15 ## KANAKKANATH ## RAMANKUTY rl 24„" fD7G2ch-gr' &4n¥:pg„ R44~ r ` E)L^DrJ 'r'' 4-p4pu t ~J'rtca GL,g+,4pbp4, Lfz~ 5A)foJ2NI. g± L,AITH4` E92- pz.g€7H4` prfelrh g s4v"A„ 9z> 5"„ 2, 5uDp4 drjfty