High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

Ramachandran v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-16
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of the writ petition by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.183/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Ramachandran, aged 68 years S/O. Arumughan, Eraippakkal House, Thenkurissi-I Village, Alathur, Palakkad

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad - 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt Rekha C. Nair – Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Ramachandran, a 68-year-old senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.183/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The suo motu proceeding was initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vestings and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner contends that delays would prejudice a senior citizen who needs to access bank loans and highlight the hardship caused by protracted proceedings; the respondent Government Pleader countered by noting the total docket and the need for due process and seniority. The court cites Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), which laid down directions for expeditious disposal of senior citizens’ cases and the process for obtaining missing reports via Village Officers while preserving seniority. The court concludes that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, should dispose of S.M.183/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions as set out in paragraph 2, and directs expeditious disposal with no order as to costs. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226, Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99Kerala Land Reforms (Vestings and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vestings and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Ramachandran contended that he is a 68-year-old senior citizen who faces potential hardship if the Land Tribunal delays disposal of S.M.No.183/2021. He sought a mandamus under Article 226 to direct the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of the matter before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi within a timeframe to be fixed by the Court. He relied on the urgency of senior citizens in land-court matters, citing the need for timely access to credit and the risk of deterioration in his tenure rights. The petitioner argued that the suo motu initiation reflects Parliament’s and the government’s policy to expedite allocation of vested land, and that the Tribunal must act in accordance with the directions laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms). He urged that the Tribunal be instructed to follow the seniority-based disposal schedule and, if necessary, obtain necessary information through Village Officers to avoid delays, while ensuring compliance with Sections 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act and Rule 14 of the 1970 Rules.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents argued that the overall pendency of Land Tribunal matters (over ten thousand cases) necessitates adherence to due process and equity, and cautioned against arbitrary out-of-turn disposal. They pointed to Narayanan Namboodiri and the Government’s directive G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD to improve efficiency. They explained that expeditious disposal must respect the seniority of cases and the 18-month outer limit, with exceptions only on stay by higher authorities. They claimed that the Land Tribunal can obtain necessary reports through Village Officers where delays occur, and that there was no justification to break the seniority or to treat this case preferentially because the petitioner is a senior citizen. They emphasized the need for proper notice and compliance with legal obligations before passing orders, and argued that the direction to expedite must not undermine the due process or create a floodgate of discretionary orders that undermine the Land Tribunal’s authority.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThe judgment repeatedly cites and adopts the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri, directing expeditious disposal of senior-citizen cases and prescribing procedural steps.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ramachandran v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 68 YEARS S/O.ARUMUGHAN, ERAIPPAKKAL HOUSE, THENKURISSI-I VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679 104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT REKHA C.NAIR- SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.183/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0375 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.3/3 in Block No.20 of Thenkurissi-I Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thenkurissi-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.183/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 10.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 68 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.183/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.183/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6647 OF 2021(E) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 10/02/2021.**