High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; No order as to costs...

Radha v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.269 of 2021 (G)
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-01-18
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.1078/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; No order as to costs; Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.1078/2020 following Narayanan Namboodiri directions.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Radha

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR) Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. K. Amminikutty (Senior Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Radha filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the respondent, the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi, to pass orders in S.M.No.1078/2020, a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The objective is assignment of the landlord’s right vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14. The petitioner, presumably seeking to secure a bank loan, emphasizes urgency in disposal of pending applications and relies on Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, decided 14.03.2018), where the Court stressed that Land Tribunals must follow seniority in disposal and may obtain reports through Village Officers to avoid delays. The judgment reiterates the GO order GO (P) No. 09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018) as part of the framework for speedy disposal and outlines directives: prioritise senior-citizen cases within six months and all other cases within 18 months, without breaking seniority, subject to higher-authority stay. The Court directs the Pattambi Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.1078/2020 strictly in accordance with law and in line with Narayanan Namboodiri, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases filed by senior citizens on priority and on seniority basis
  • Disposal of cases according to seniority, with outer time-limits (six months for senior-citizen cases; 18 months for others) unless stayed by higher authorities
  • Land Tribunal may obtain reports from Village Officers if Revenue Inspectors are unavailable
  • G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD will form part of the judgment

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus under Article 226 directing the respondent to pass orders in S.M.No.1078/2020 on the file of the Special Tahasildar (LR), Pattambi, for assignment of the landlord’s right vested in the Government under sections 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, through the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The petition underscores delay in disposal of cases, urgency for obtaining credit from banks, and the need to implement the fast-track directions in Narayanan Namboodiri’s judgment. It relies on reports via Village Officers to accelerate report collection and on seniority-based disposal, with specific emphasis on expeditious handling of senior-citizen matters.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that the disposal of pending suo motu proceedings must adhere to the judicial directions in Narayanan Namboodiri, preserving seniority and avoiding out-of-turn disposal. They emphasize the backlog (over 11,000 cases) and the necessity to obtain reports from Village Officers where Revenue Inspectors are unavailable. They invoke GO 09/2018/RD to form part of the judgment and argue for adherence to time-bound targets (six months for senior-citizen cases; 18 months for others) and for proper service of notices as per the Court’s directions.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe judgment in Narayanan Namboodiri is followed, which held that Land Tribunals must dispose cases in seniority order and expeditiously, and may obtain reports through Village Officers to expedite proceedings; the current case directs compliance with those principles.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Radha v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 28TH POUSHA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.269 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONER:** **RADHA AGED 41 YEARS W/O. HARIDASAN.K, MANAKKATHODI VEEDU, KULIKKALLUR VILLAGE, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.) MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD 679 104.** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY -SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** WP(C)No.269 of 2021 2 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to pass appropriate orders in S.M.No.1078/2020 on the file of the Special Tahasildar (LR), Pattambi, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0506 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.381/1 in Block No.37 of Kulikkallur Village in Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated WP(C)No.269 of 2021 3 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by WP(C)No.269 of 2021 4 the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land WP(C)No.269 of 2021 5 Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other WP(C)No.269 of 2021 6 cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kulikkallur Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1078/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 24.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1078/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in WP(C)No.269 of 2021 7 **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.1078/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE** **yd** WP(C)No.269 of 2021 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 24.12.2020.** ## **RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL** **TRUE COPY** **P.A. TO JUDGE**