High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions

Pushpa K. v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal Office (LR) and Village Officer, Thiruvegappura

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2889 of 2021(I)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-04
Court Decision / Holding
Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is directed to dispose of S.M.No.1527/2018 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri; the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Pushpa K.

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal Office (LR), Mini Civil Station, Kaniampuram, Ottapalam, Palakkad District-679104
  • Village Officer, Thiruvegappura Village, Thiruvegappura, Palakkad District-679304

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. P.T. Dinesh

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty - Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Pushpa K., a resident of Palakkad district, filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to compel the 1st respondent Special Tahsildar (LR)/Land Tribunal Office (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.1527/2018 before the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The suo motu proceeding under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, aims at vesting the landlord’s right, title and interest in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and at issuing a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14, in respect of 2.99 acres in Re.Sy.No.107/8-2-1 at Thiruvegappura, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. The petitioner urged expeditious disposal, highlighting delays in tribunals and the need for timely purchase certificates, especially when loan arrangements are sought. The Court references Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017) to emphasize that disposal must follow seniority and that reports may be obtained through Village Officers; it also notes the Government GO and the importance of prioritizing senior citizens’ cases. The respondents argued adherence to law and seniority, supported by the GO and Section 99 provisions. The Court ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.1527/2018 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, and disposes of the petition with no costs, while acknowledging substantial pendency before the Tribunals (2434 cases).

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Disposal of cases on the basis of seniority of registration
  • Expeditious disposal of cases; priority to senior citizens
  • Do not break the seniority of cases except by directions of this Court or higher authorities
  • Use of Village Officers to obtain necessary reports to expedite proceedings

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Petitioner sought a mandamus to compel the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1527/2018; pressed for expeditious disposal in line with the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment and GO guidance; stressed the need to uphold seniority rules and to prevent delay in obtaining a purchase certificate, especially where loan arrangements depend on the certificate.

Contentions of Respondents

Senior Government Pleader argued for strict compliance with law and the established seniority framework; highlighted the substantial pendency (2434 suo motu proceedings); pointed to mechanism in GO (P). No.09/2018/RD and Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act to secure timely information from Village Officers; urged adherence to court directions and procedural norms.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe judgment explicitly adopts the Narayanan Namboodiri directions on expeditious disposal and seniority-based processing, applying them to the current case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Pushpa K. v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal Office (LR) and Village Officer, Thiruvegappura and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **PUSHPA K., AGED 47 YEARS W/O. SURESH KUMAR, RESIDING AT KUTHIRAMKUZHI HOUSE, CHEMBRA P.O., THIRUVEGAPURA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679304.** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.DINESH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), LAND TRIBUNAL OFFICE (LR), MINI CIVIL STATION, KANIAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679104. 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THIRUVEGAPPURA VILLAGE, THIRUVEGAPURA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679304.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** -2- ## W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1527/2018 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 2.99 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.107/8-2-1 of Thiruvegappura Village of Pattambi Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. ## W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of ## W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining ## W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the ## W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thiruvegappura Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1527/2018, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 20.06.2018, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is 2434. ## W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1527/2018 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.1527/2018, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2889 OF 2021(I) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PART OF THE RELINQUISHMENT DEED NO.699/2018 DATED 11/04/2018.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 22/05/2020 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THIRUVEGAPPURA.** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 20/06/2018 IN SM NO.1527/2018 BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), OTTAPPALAM.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.28398/2017 DATED 14/03/2018 ALONG WITH GO(P) NO.09/2018/RD DATED 22/02/2018 WHICH IS PART OF THE JUDGMENT.**