Purushothaman and Others v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Gopinath P.
- Judgment Date
- 2023-08-07
- Court Decision / Holding
- The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. The court held that petitioners can challenge their non-inclusion in the final voters list only by filing an election petition after the election process is completed, and the High Court should not stay the ongoing election process on the basis of objections to the electoral roll. The court clarified that dismissal of the writ petition does not bar petitioners from seeking statutory remedies after the election process is completed.
- Final Disposition
- Dismissed
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Purushothaman
- Sailamma
- Surendran
- Rajappan
- Sarrojini
- Lenin
- Sheeba
- Thampi
- Damodaran
- Maniyappan C.
- Vasanthi
- Rajan
- SHYLAJA
- V.V. PURUSHAN
- SARALA
- SHYLAJA
Respondents
- The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Department of Co-operation, Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Jawahar Saha-karana Bhavan, DPI Junction, Thycaud P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN – 695 014
- Joint Registrar, Alappuzha District Level Officer, Office of the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Pae chi Angalamman Kovil Trust Buildings, Pazhavangadi Jn., Iron Bridge P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 011
- Assistant Registrar, Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherthala P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 524
- State Co-operative Election Commissioner, State Co-operative Election Commission, Co-Bank Towers, Vikas Bhavan P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN – 695 033
- Electoral Officer/Assistant Registrar (General), Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherthala P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 524
- Returning Officer/Cooperative Society Inspector (Pattanakkad Unit), Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherthala P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 524
- Thuravoor Panchayat Pattikajathi Service Cooperative Society Ltd. No. 722, Thuravoor P.O., Cherthala – 688 532, represented by its Secretary
- The Secretary, Thuravoor Panchayat Pattikajathi Service Cooperative Society Ltd. No. 722, Thuravoor P.O., Cherthala, PIN – 688 532
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • T. Kabil Chandran
- • R. Anjali
- • Aayshath Najila Schemnad
Counsels for Respondents
- • Kavery S Thampi
- • Smt.C.S.Sheeja
Case Synopsis & Summary
The petitioners, 16 members of Thuravoor Panchayath Pattikajathi Service Cooperative Society Ltd., approached the Kerala High Court challenging the final voters list published for elections to the society’s Managing Committee. They allege that despite objections raised to the preliminary electoral roll, their names were not included in the final voters list, effectively excluding them from participation in the election. They sought a directive to the Returning Officer to consider the objections and to prepare a fresh final voters list so as to enable a fair electoral process. The respondents, including the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Joint Registrar, Assistant Registrar, State Co-operative Election Commissioner, electoral officers, Returning Officer, and the Thuravoor Society (represented by its Secretary), opposed the petition, arguing that the matter falls within an ongoing election process and that the High Court should not interfere at this intermediate stage. They rely on the Supreme Court principle laid down in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Mharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra (2001) 8 SCC 509, that challenges to electoral rolls during the process must await post-election remedies. The court, applying this principle, dismissed the writ petition, clarifying that petitioners may challenge non-inclusion via an election petition after the process concludes, without bar to statutory remedies later.
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Electoral roll is an intermediate stage in the election process; High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process; remedy lies in filing an election petition after the election.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners contended that the final voters list for the society elections was published without considering their objections to the preliminary list and without including their names in the final list. They sought a direction to the Returning Officer to consider the objections and to prepare a fresh final voters list to enable the holding of elections to the Managing Committee of the 7th respondent society. They argued that exclusion from the final list deprived them of participating in the election process and that the court should intervene to correct the electoral roll at this stage.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents argued that the writ petition is not maintainable and that, as per the Supreme Court in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (supra), the electoral roll is an intermediate stage and the election process should not be stayed. They submitted that any challenge to the election should be made after the process is completed through an election petition, and that the court should not interfere to halt or revisit the electoral roll during the ongoing process.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Mharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others | 2001(8) SCC 509 | Positive | The judgment relies on this Supreme Court decision to support the proposition that the electoral process, including the electoral roll, is an intermediate stage and should not be stayed by the High Court; the remedy lies in an election petition after the election. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Purushothaman and Others v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.