High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDismissed

Purushothaman and Others v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Gopinath P.
Judgment Date
2023-08-07
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. The court held that petitioners can challenge their non-inclusion in the final voters list only by filing an election petition after the election process is completed, and the High Court should not stay the ongoing election process on the basis of objections to the electoral roll. The court clarified that dismissal of the writ petition does not bar petitioners from seeking statutory remedies after the election process is completed.
Final Disposition
Dismissed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Purushothaman
  • Sailamma
  • Surendran
  • Rajappan
  • Sarrojini
  • Lenin
  • Sheeba
  • Thampi
  • Damodaran
  • Maniyappan C.
  • Vasanthi
  • Rajan
  • SHYLAJA
  • V.V. PURUSHAN
  • SARALA
  • SHYLAJA

Respondents

  • The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Department of Co-operation, Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Jawahar Saha-karana Bhavan, DPI Junction, Thycaud P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN – 695 014
  • Joint Registrar, Alappuzha District Level Officer, Office of the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Pae chi Angalamman Kovil Trust Buildings, Pazhavangadi Jn., Iron Bridge P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 011
  • Assistant Registrar, Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherthala P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 524
  • State Co-operative Election Commissioner, State Co-operative Election Commission, Co-Bank Towers, Vikas Bhavan P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN – 695 033
  • Electoral Officer/Assistant Registrar (General), Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherthala P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 524
  • Returning Officer/Cooperative Society Inspector (Pattanakkad Unit), Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherthala P.O., Alappuzha, PIN – 688 524
  • Thuravoor Panchayat Pattikajathi Service Cooperative Society Ltd. No. 722, Thuravoor P.O., Cherthala – 688 532, represented by its Secretary
  • The Secretary, Thuravoor Panchayat Pattikajathi Service Cooperative Society Ltd. No. 722, Thuravoor P.O., Cherthala, PIN – 688 532

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • T. Kabil Chandran
  • • R. Anjali
  • • Aayshath Najila Schemnad

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Kavery S Thampi
  • • Smt.C.S.Sheeja

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioners, 16 members of Thuravoor Panchayath Pattikajathi Service Cooperative Society Ltd., approached the Kerala High Court challenging the final voters list published for elections to the society’s Managing Committee. They allege that despite objections raised to the preliminary electoral roll, their names were not included in the final voters list, effectively excluding them from participation in the election. They sought a directive to the Returning Officer to consider the objections and to prepare a fresh final voters list so as to enable a fair electoral process. The respondents, including the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Joint Registrar, Assistant Registrar, State Co-operative Election Commissioner, electoral officers, Returning Officer, and the Thuravoor Society (represented by its Secretary), opposed the petition, arguing that the matter falls within an ongoing election process and that the High Court should not interfere at this intermediate stage. They rely on the Supreme Court principle laid down in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Mharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra (2001) 8 SCC 509, that challenges to electoral rolls during the process must await post-election remedies. The court, applying this principle, dismissed the writ petition, clarifying that petitioners may challenge non-inclusion via an election petition after the process concludes, without bar to statutory remedies later.

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Electoral roll is an intermediate stage in the election process; High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process; remedy lies in filing an election petition after the election.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contended that the final voters list for the society elections was published without considering their objections to the preliminary list and without including their names in the final list. They sought a direction to the Returning Officer to consider the objections and to prepare a fresh final voters list to enable the holding of elections to the Managing Committee of the 7th respondent society. They argued that exclusion from the final list deprived them of participating in the election process and that the court should intervene to correct the electoral roll at this stage.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argued that the writ petition is not maintainable and that, as per the Supreme Court in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (supra), the electoral roll is an intermediate stage and the election process should not be stayed. They submitted that any challenge to the election should be made after the process is completed through an election petition, and that the court should not interfere to halt or revisit the electoral roll during the ongoing process.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Mharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others2001(8) SCC 509PositiveThe judgment relies on this Supreme Court decision to support the proposition that the electoral process, including the electoral roll, is an intermediate stage and should not be stayed by the High Court; the remedy lies in an election petition after the election.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Purushothaman and Others v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. ``` ## **`MONDAY, THE 7[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1945`** ## **`WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` 1PURUSHOTHAMAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O THEVARUKUTTY, MEMBERSHIP NO. 741, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.722, PANDARAPPATTATHIL, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 2SAILAMMA, AGED 52 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 742, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, PANDARAPPATTATHIL, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 3SURENDRAN, AGED 52 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 619, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, PANDARAPPATTATHIL, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 4RAJAPPAN, AGED 74 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 728, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, CHALUCHIRA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 5SARROJINI, AGED 68 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 729, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, CHALUCHIRA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 6LENIN, AGED 46 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 730, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, CHALUCHIRA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 7SHEEBA AGED 38 YEARS MEMBERSHIP NO. 731, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, CHALUCHIRA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN - 688532 ``` WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 2 ``` 8THAMPI, AGED 43 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 732, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, CHALUCHIRA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN - 688532 9DAMODARAN, AGED 70 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 435, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, KUMMAMPALLI, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532 10MANIYAPPAN C. AGED 62 YEARS MEMBERSHIP NO. 711, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, 'AISWARYA', VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 11VASANTHI, AGED 59 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.712, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, 'AISWARYA', VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 12RAJAN, AGED 60 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 543, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, KAYALKKARA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 13SHYLAJA, AGED 49 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 544, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, KAYALKKARA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. ``` ``` 14V.V. PURUSHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 703, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, ULLADAMTHARA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. ``` WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 3 ``` 15SARALA, AGED 63 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 129, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, VATTATHARA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. 16SHYLAJA, AGED 52 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO. 546, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, AARYAKKARA, VALAMANGALAM SOUTH, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN – 688 532. BY ADVS. T.KABIL CHANDRAN R.ANJALI AAYSHATH NAJILA SCHEMNAD ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - `1 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 014.` - `2 JOINT REGISTRAR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT LEVEL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PAECHI ANGALAMMAN KOVIL TRUST BUILDINGS, PAZHAVANGADI JN., IRON BRIDGE P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 011.` - `3 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 524.` - `4 STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, CO-BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 033.` - `5 ELECTORAL OFFICER/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 524.` WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 4 - `6 RETURNING OFFICER/COOPERATIVE SOCIETY INSPECTOR (PATTANAKKAD UNIT), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 524.` - `7 THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, THURAVOOR P.O., CHERTHALA – 688 532, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.` - `8 THE SECRETARY, THURAVOOR PANCHAYAT PATTIKAJATHI SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 722, THURAVOOR P.O., CHERTHALA,PIN – 688 532. BY ADV KAVERY S THAMPI BY SMT.C.S.SHEEJA, SR.GP` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 5 ## JUDGMENT Petitioners have approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that a final voters list has been published for holding elections to the Managing Committee of 7[th] respondent Society without considering the objections preferred by the petitioner against the preliminary voters list and without including the names of the petitioners in the final voters list. It is the case of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners have been illegally excluded from the final voters list and therefore, a direction may be issued to the Returning Officer to consider the objections and prepare a fresh voters list for holding elections to the Managing Committee of the 7[th] respondent Society. 2. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State Co-operative Election Commission and the learned counsel appearing for respondents 7 and 8 would submit that in the light of the principles laid down in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Mharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others [2001(8) SCC 509] , WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 6 the writ petition is not maintainable and the remedy, if any, of the petitioners lies in filing an election petition after the election process is completed. In paragraph 12 of the judgment in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (supra) it was held as follows:- “12. In view of our finding that preparation of the electoral roll being an intermediate stage in the process of election of the Managing Committee of a specified society and the election process having been set in motion, it is well settled that the High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process even though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of rules while preparing the electoral roll. It is not disputed that the election in question has already been held and the result thereof has been stayed by an order of this Court, and once the result of the election is declared, it would be open to the appellant to challenge the election of the returned candidate, if aggrieved, by means of an election petition before the Election Tribunal.” 3. In the light of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid judgment, I am of the view that the petitioners can only challenge their non-inclusion in the final voters list by filing an election petition after the election process is completed. It will not be proper or legal for this Court to issue any orders in the light of the principles laid down in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (supra). The writ petition is accordingly WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 7 dismissed, making it clear that the dismissal of this writ petition will not stand in the way of the petitioners seeking statutory remedies after the election process is completed. Sd/GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 25002 OF 2023 8 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25002/2023`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION NOTIFICATION NO.01/1132/2023/E(1)S.C.E.C DATED 05.07.2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ``` - `Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION GENERAL BODY NOTICE DATED 06.07.2023 PUBLISHED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT` - `Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY ELECTORAL ROLL/VOTERS LIST DATED 07.07.2023 PUBLISHED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT` ``` Exhibit P4A TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT/OBJECTION DATED 11.07.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT ``` ``` Exhibit P5A TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT/OBJECTION DATED 11.07.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P6A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ELECTORAL ROLL/VOTERS LIST DATED 19.07.2023 PUBLISHED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P7A TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT/OBJECTION DATED 14.07.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P8A TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT/OBJECTION DATED 14.07.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P9A TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY SRI.C.T.PURUSHAN, SRI.T.ANIRUDHAN AND SMT.MINIMOL TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P10A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 03/2011 DATED 09.06.2011 IN NO. E(2) 399/2011 S.C.E.C ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ```