High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeBail application allowed; bail granted subject ...

Premlal K v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:BAIL APPL. NO. 6097 OF 2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. S. Dias
Judgment Date
2024-08-01
Court Decision / Holding
The application is allowed; bail granted on payment of Rs.50,000 bond with two solvent sureties, with conditions including weekly appearance before the IO for two months or until final report, no inducement or tampering with witnesses, no commission of offences, surrender of passport if any, and potential cancellation of bail on breach. The court notes the police may continue investigation and effect recoveries as appropriate under the guidance cited (Sushila Aggarwal).
Final Disposition
Bail application allowed; bail granted subject to specified conditions.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • PREMLAL K

Respondents

  • State of Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Christine Mathew

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. Neema T. V. - Senior Public Prosecutor

Case Synopsis & Summary

This bail petition under Section 439 CrPC concerns PREMLAL K in Crime No. 96/2024 registered at the Changanassery Excise Range Office, Kottayam, for alleged possession of two litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor intended for sale, an offence punishable under Section 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act. The Kerala High Court, in a single-judge module led by Justice C. S. Dias, heard the matter on 01 August 2024. The petitioner contends innocence and false implication, noting that he has no prior criminal antecedents and has remained in judicial custody since 15 July 2024. He argues that the investigation is largely complete and recovery has already been effected, making continued detention unnecessary. The State, represented by the Senior Public Prosecutor, opposes bail, arguing that the investigation remains in progress and that, if released, the petitioner may commit a similar offence. After careful consideration of the facts — including the short duration of custody, the small quantity involved, lack of antecedents, and the progress of investigation — the court concludes that further detention is unwarranted. The court thus grants bail on conditions: bond for Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties; appearance before the Investigating Officer every Saturday for two months or until the final report; a prohibition on inducing or tampering with witnesses; risk of non-commission of offences; surrender of passport if any; and a provision that breach may lead to cancellation of bail. The order also cites Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another to support the police’s permissible action while bail is in effect. The bail application is allowed.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Section 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1 of 1077

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Petitioner contends innocence, falsely implicated, with no criminal antecedents; detained since 15.07.2024; investigation largely complete with recovery effected; seeks bail.

Contentions of Respondents

State opposes bail, citing ongoing investigation and risk of reoffending; argues the contraband is small but bail should not be granted at this stage.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another2020 (1) KHC 663PositiveCited to support the proposition that Investigating Officer actions, including further investigation and recoveries, may proceed even while bail is in force as per the Supreme Court guidance referenced.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Premlal K v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS`** ``` THURSDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1946 ``` ## **`BAIL APPL. NO. 6097 OF 2024`** ``` CRIME NO.96/2024 OF CHANGANACHERRY EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, ``` ``` KOTTAYAM ``` ## **`PETITIONER/ACCUSED:`** ``` PREMLAL K AGED 53 YEARS S/O GOPIDAS, CHAKRAYATHIL VEEDU, CHAKARYATHIKUNNU KARA THRIKODITHANAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-, PIN - 686105 ``` ``` BY ADV. CHRISTINE MATHEW ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/STATE:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 ``` ``` BY ADV. SMT. NEEMA T. V. - SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ``` ``` THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` 2 ``` ``` BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024 ``` **C.S.DIAS, J.** **-------------------------------------------------------Bail Application No. 6097 of 2024 ------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 1[st] day of August, 2024** ## **O R D E R** The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the sole accused in Crime No.96/2024 of the Changanassery Excise Range Office, Kottayam, which is registered against him for allegedly committing the offence punishable under Section 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1 of 1077. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.07.2024. 2. The essence of the prosecution case is that: the accused was found in conscious possession of 2 liters of Indian made foreign liquor, which was meant for sale. The accused was arrested on the spot with the ``` 3 ``` ## **`BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024`** contraband article. Thus, the accused has committed the above offence. 3. Heard; Sri. Christine Mathew, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Neema T. V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is totally innocent of the accusations levelled against him. He has been falsely implicated in the crime. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 15.07.2024, the investigation in the case is practically complete and recovery has been effected. Moreover, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents. Hence, the petitioner may be released on bail. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. She submitted that the investigation is in progress. She also stated that if the petitioner is ``` 4 ``` ``` BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024 ``` released on bail, he would commit a similar offence. Hence, the application may be dismissed. 6. On an anxious consideration of the facts, the rival submissions made across the Bar and the materials placed on record, especially on considering the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 15.07.2024, that the contraband involved in the case is of a small quantity, that the petitioner does not have criminal antecedents, that the investigation in the case is practically complete and recovery has been effected, I am of the view that the petitioner’s further detention is unnecessary. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail. In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to ``` 5 ``` ## **`BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024`** the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions: - i. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Saturday between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m for a period of two months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; - ii. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; iii. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail; ``` 6 ``` ## **`BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024`** - iv. The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the Trial Court at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the Trial Court on the date of execution of the bond; - v. In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law; - vi. Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be filed and entertained before the Trial Court; - vii. Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the ``` 7 ``` ``` BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024 ``` petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another** [2020 (1) KHC 663]. **Sd/C.S. DIAS JUDGE** BR ``` 8 ``` ## **`BAIL APPL. NO.6097 OF 2024`** ## **`APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 6097/2024`** ``` PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure 1TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT DATED 15.07.2024 IN CRIME NO. 96/2024 OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICE , CHANGANASSERY ``` ``` RESPONDENT’S ANNEXURES: NIL ```