High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of without granting relief; votes of A...

Praveen P. Kottakuzhi v. State Co-operative Election Commission and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) 43627 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • N. Nagareesh
Judgment Date
2023-12-22
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of without granting the relief prayed for by the petitioner. The court directs that votes cast by members included in Ext. P7 who were enrolled by the Administrative Committee be kept in a separate ballot box, so the petitioner may raise their grievance in an appropriate forum after the elections, if necessary.
Final Disposition
Disposed of without granting relief; votes of Admin Committee-enrolled members to be kept separately for potential post-election challenge.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Praveen P. Kottakuzhi

Respondents

  • State Co-operative Election Commission
  • Electoral Officer/Assistant Registrar (General)
  • Returning Officer/Unit Inspector Pappanamcode
  • Kerala State Labour Co-Operative’s Federation Limited (Labourfed)
  • Administrative Committee to Labour Federation

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. K.M. Sathyanatha Menon

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri C.M. Nazar, Standing Counsel

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Praveen P. Kottakuzhi, is a member and president of the Trivandrum Labour Contract Co-operative Society Ltd. He challenges the electoral process for the Kerala State Labour Co-operatives Federation Limited (Labourfed), contending that the final voters list (Ext. P6) includes members (Serial Nos. 137–172) enrolled by the Administrative Committee, which is illegal in light of this Court’s precedents. The petitioner maintains that such enrollees violate established norms that exclude Administrative Committee-enrolled members from the voters list, and he seeks to stop the ongoing election and direct a fresh voters list with eligible members only (excluding the challenged names). He relies on precedents like TK Porinchu v. Joint Registrar (2004) and Joint Registrar v. TA Kuttappan, as well as the Supreme Court pronouncement in Denny V.P. and this Court’s W.P.(C) No. 8708/2007, arguing for intervention in case of patent illegality. The respondents contend that, since the election process has been notified and is underway, interference is unwarranted, pointing to Rule 81(d)(iv) of the KCS Rules and the principle that illegality, if established, can be remedied via an election petition. The court ultimately disposes the petition without relief, directing that votes cast by Administrative Committee-enrolled members be kept in a separate ballot box for potential post-election challenge.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 69, Kerala Co-operative Societies ActRule 81(d)(iv), Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Administrator has no power to admit new members (as per cited precedents)
  • Patent illegality in the process of election allows judicial intervention (when patent illegality is established)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues that Ext. P6 final Voters List includes names enrolled by the Administrative Committee (Ext. P7), which violates established rules and this Court’s decisions. He seeks to suspend the election and direct the preparation of a fresh voters list containing eligible members only, excluding those enrolled in violation of law. He relies on TK Porinchu v. Joint Registrar, Joint Registrar v. TA Kuttappan, Denny V.P., and W.P.(C) No. 8708/2007 to contend that patent illegality in the electoral roll warrants intervention, and on the Supreme Court pronouncements to assert that an Administrator has no power to admit new members. He also urges that Ext. P6 is illegal and should be set aside to prevent illegality from tainting the election.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents contend that interruption of an ongoing election is unwarranted. They rely on Denny V.P. to assert that procedural breaches can be challenged via an Election Petition under Rule 81(d)(iv) of the KCS Rules, not by halting the current process. They cite Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami v. State of Maharashtra to support why the court should refrain from interference at this stage, arguing that the election notification has been published and the process has commenced. They argue that the Administrator may be subject to challenge post-election if illegality is proven, and that the matter should be left to the election petition mechanism under existing rules.”},

Cited Precedents (5)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Denny V.P. v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General) and others2019 KHC 4954Positive relied upon as a controlling principle that illegality in the electoral roll could be challenged; the court should not stall an ongoing election and may address issues via election petition.
T.K. Porinchu v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies2004 (1) KLT 281Positive Supreme Court pronouncement that the Administrator has no power to admit new members supports the petitioner's challenge to Admin-enrolled voters.
Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.A. Kuttappan2000 (6) SCC 127Positive supports view that Administrator’s power to enroll new members is limited; used to resist broad expansion of the electoral roll.
W.P.(C) No. 8708/2007(no citation provided in document)Positive supports the proposition that patent illegality in election can be addressed; justifies interference via election petition.
Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami v. State of Maharashtra2001 (8) SCC 509Mentioned Only cited by respondents; used to argue no interference at this stage; not a controlling holding in this decision.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Praveen P. Kottakuzhi v. State Co-operative Election Commission and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 22[ND] DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 1ST POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 43627 OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` PRAVEEN.P.KOTTAKUZHI AGED 38 YEARS S/O PRABHAKARAN PILLAI PRESIDENT, TRIVANDRUM LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO: T 1072, KUMARAPURAM, AYIROPARA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695584 ``` ## **`BY ADV K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON`** ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 3RD FLOOR, CO-BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695033 ``` ``` 2THE ELECTORAL OFFICER/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE LABOUR CO OPERATIVE'S FEDERATION LIMITED NO 4491 [LABOURFED], THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, COSTECH BUILDING, T.C 11/738(1), DIVISION OFFICE ROAD, NEAR HOTEL PRASANTH, PMG, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695033 ``` ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 2 ``` - **`3 THE RETURNING OFFICER/UNIT INSPECTOR PAPPANAMCODE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE LABOUR CO OPERATIVE'S FEDERATION LIMITED NO 4491 [LABOURFED], THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001, COSTECH BUILDING, T.C 11/738(1), DIVISION OFFICE ROAD, NEAR HOTEL PRASANTH, PMG, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033`** - **`4 KERALA STATE LABOUR CO OPERATIVE'S FEDERATION LIMITED NO 4491 [LABOURFED], THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, COSTECH BUILDING, T.C 11/738(1), DIVISION OFFICE ROAD, NEAR HOTEL PRASANTH, PMG, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PIN - 695033`** - **`5 ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE TO KERALA STATE LABOUR CO OPERATIVE'S FEDERATION LIMITED NO 4491 [LABOURFED],THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, COSTECH BUILDING, T.C 11/738(1), DIVISION OFFICE ROAD, NEAR HOTEL PRASANTH, PMG, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, PIN – 695033`** ``` SRI.C.M. NAZAR, STANDING COUNSEL ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 3 ``` ## **JUDGMENT** Dated this the 22[nd ] day of December, 2023 The petitioner, who is a Member and President of Trivandrum Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited, has filed this writ petition seeking to direct respondents 1 to 3 to stop the conduct of the election notified to the 4[th] respondent-Federation vide Ext.P1 and to further direct respondents 1 to 3 to exclude the members listed in Ext.P7 from Ext.P6 final Voters List and from the election process notified as per Ext.P1. The petitioner further seeks to direct the 1[st] respondent to conduct election to the 4[th] respondentFederation after preparing a fresh Voters List containing eligible members only. 2. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the members listed as Serial Nos.122 to 172 in Ext.P2 preliminary Voters List are enrolled by the Administrative Committee. This ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 4 ``` Court in a catena of decisions has held that the members enrolled by the Administrative Committee cannot be included in the Voters List. In spite of objections, such persons enrolled by the Administrative Committee were included in Ext.P6 final Voters List at Serial Nos.137 to 172. Ext.P6 final Voters List is therefore tangibly and palpably illegal. No election can be conducted on the basis of the said final Voters List. 3. Regarding the alternate remedy under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.8708/2007 and contended that when there is patent illegality in the process of election, this Court can interfere in the matter without driving the aggrieved party to the remedy under Section 69. As Ext.P6 Voters List is prepared in violation of the law laid down by this Court, Ext.P6 is liable to be set aside to the extent ineligible voters are included. ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 5 ``` 4. Standing Counsel for the 1[st] respondent, on the other hand, relied on the judgment of this Court in _**Denny V.P. v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General) and others** [2019 KHC 4954]_ to contend that if there is breach of rules or there is non-compliance of certain mandatory provisions of rules while preparing the electoral roll, it could be challenged under Rule 81(d)(iv) of KCS Rules by means of an Election Petition. Therefore, no interference is called for at this stage since election notification is already published and the election process is going on, urged the Standing Counsel representing the 1[st] respondent. The Standing Counsel also relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in _**Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami v. State of Maharashtra and others** [2001 (8) SCC 509]._ 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing the 1[st] respondent. ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 6 ``` 6. The grievance of the petitioner is about the inclusion of certain members in Ext.P6 final Voters List. The allegation of the petitioner is that those persons objected to in the matter of inclusion in the Voters List, are members who are enrolled by the Administrative Committee. The counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of this Court in _**T.K. Porinchu v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies** [2004 (1) KLT 281]_ to contend that the Administrator has no power to enroll new members. In view of the categorical pronouncement of the Supreme Court that the Administrator has no power to admit new members, the position is not open to challenge, contends the counsel for the petitioner. 7. The petitioner also relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in _**Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.A. Kuttappan** [2000 (6) SCC 127]_ and urged that the Administrator or Administrative Committee has no power to enroll new members. ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 7 ``` 8. I find that irrespective of the competency of the Administrative Committee to enroll new members, a Division Bench of this Court in _**Denny V.P.**_ (supra) has held that if there is breach of rules or there is non compliance of certain mandatory provisions of rules while preparing the electoral rule, it could be challenged under the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules and merely because illegality in the matter of preparation of electoral roll is alleged this Court will not be justified in interfering with the election process once it is started, since such illegality, if established later, could be dealt with appropriately in an election petition. 9. In view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court, I am not inclined to stall the election in the middle of the election process. However, taking into consideration the specific allegation made by the petitioner in the writ petition, I am of the view that the votes casted by the members who are allegedly enrolled by the Administrative Committee, should be kept in a separate Ballot Box in the election. ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 8 ``` The writ petition is therefore disposed of without granting any relief prayed for by the petitioner and at the same time, directing the respondents that the votes cast by the members included in Ext.P7, who are enrolled by the Administrative Committee, shall be kept in a separate Ballot Box, so that the petitioner can raise their grievance before the appropriate forum after the elections, if found necessary. ## **Sd/-** **N.NAGARESH JUDGE** spk ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 9 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 43627/2023`** ## **`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`** ``` Exhibit P1 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION NOTIFICATION NO: E(2)/7154/2023/SCEC DATED 23.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ``` - **`Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLICATION OF THE PRIMARY ELECTORAL ROLL PUBLISHED IN FORM 34 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.11.2023`** ``` Exhibit P3 ``` - **`A TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT FEDERATION PUBLISHED BY THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE AUDIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ON 30.10.2023`** - **`Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO: RCS/166/2023 MT(1) DATED 18.01.2023 OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES`** - **`Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PRIMARY LABOUR CONTRACT COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSOCIATION, TRIVANDRUM TO EXT P2 PRIMARY ELECTORAL ROLL DATED 5.12.2023`** ``` Exhibit P6A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL ELECTORAL ROLL PUBLISHED IN FORM 35 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.12.2023 ``` - **`Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF MEMBERS ADDED BY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE IN EXT P2`** ``` Exhibit P8A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FROM THE PUBLIC INFORMATIONOFFICER,ASSISTANT REGISTRAR [GENERAL]OFFICE, KALPATTA DATED 13.04.2022 ``` ``` Exhibit P9 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE PUBLISHED BY THE ELECTORAL OFFICER DATED 23-02-2021 ``` ``` WP(C) No.43627 of 2023 ``` ``` 10 ``` ``` Exhibit P10A TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION REGISTER MAINTAINED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN FILE NO: 217/2021ANDOBTAINEDBYTHE PETITIONER UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 ```