High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDismissed

PRASANNA KUMAR v. RADHAKRISHNAN AND OTHERS

Case / Petition Number:OP(C) No.199 of 2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. Jayachandran
Judgment Date
2024-03-05
Court Decision / Holding
The Original Petition is dismissed. The court finds no illegality in Ext. P5. The petitioner is at liberty to pursue other remedies available in law against the supplemental final decree dated 08.12.2022 (I.A. 13/2020) and the delivery sought on the basis of such decree.
Final Disposition
Dismissed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Prasanna Kumar

Respondents

  • Radakrishnan
  • Pushpavally
  • Geetha
  • Lalitha
  • Jayaprakash
  • Kunjumol
  • Leela Mohandas
  • Pramod
  • Prasanth
  • Prasad S/O Purushothaman and Manikka Sreemathi
  • Sreemathi (Manikka Sreemathi) W/O Purushothaman
  • Anirudhan S/O Gopalans
  • Kumari
  • Arundhathi
  • Chandrasekharan
  • Anirudhan S/O Narayanan
  • Purushothaman (Died)
  • Ponnamma
  • Sarasamma
  • Thankamma
  • Santha
  • Pradeep
  • Geetha @ Mini
  • Raveendran
  • Viswambaran
  • Radha D/O Raman & Narayani
  • Leela D/O Raman & Narayani
  • Mallika
  • Devarajan
  • Prakashan S/O Kesavan
  • Prasanna D/O Nagamma & Kesavan
  • Sumalatha (Sum a) / Kesavan
  • Prabhavathi (Usha) W/O Anirudhan
  • Aji
  • Arun
  • Kunjumani
  • Akhil
  • Viswanathan Nair
  • Vijayan Lakshmi

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Thomas T. Varghese
  • • Philip T. Varghese
  • • Achu Subha Abraham
  • • V. T. Litha
  • • K. R. Monisha
  • • Jijo Paul

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Dr V N Sankarjee
  • • V N Madhusudanan
  • • R. Udaya Jyothi
  • • M. M. Vinod
  • • M. Suseela
  • • Keerthi B. Chandran
  • • Vijayan Pillai P.K.
  • • C. Purushothaman Nair
  • • Sineesh K. M.

Case Synopsis & Summary

Prasanna Kumar, the petitioner in OP(C) No.199 of 2024 before the Kerala High Court, challenges Ext. P5, dated 12.01.2024, in EA No.637/2023 in EP No.486/2023 arising from O.S. No.403/1982 of the Principal Munsiff Court, Cherthala. The petition traces the chain of decrees in the partition suit, including the Final Decree dated 20.01.2004 (Exhibit P1) and the Supplementary Final Decree dated 24.09.2021 (Exhibit P2), as well as subsequent execution proceedings (EP 486/2023) and the related EA (EA 637/2023). The petitioner contends entitlement to challenge the execution order under Order 21, Rule 97, on the ground that, as the legal heir of the 15th defendant in the partition suit, he has standing to seek delivery and impugn Ext. P5. The learned Judge, however, notes that the petitioner is a legal heir of a party to the suit, but Rule 97’s “any person” does not extend to a judgment debtor, citing Bhwanlal v. Satyanarain, 1995 (1) SCC 6. Consequently, Ext. P4 was dismissed by Ext. P5, and the petition is dismissed. The Court clarifies that the petitioner may pursue legal remedies against the supplemental final decree dated 08.12.2022 (I.A.13/2020) and the delivery sought thereunder.

Provisions of Law Cited

Order 21, Rule 97, CPCCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Interpretation of 'any person' under Order 21 Rule 97; Bhwan Lal v. Satyanarain, 1995 (1) SCC 6 (Judgment-debtor cannot be treated as 'any person' under Rule 97)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that, as a legal heir of the original 15th defendant in the partition suit (O.S. No. 403/1982), he has standing to challenge the proceedings under Order 21, Rule 97 and seeks to set aside Ext. P5, arguing entitlement to relief against the execution steps tied to the final and supplementary decrees. He relies on the sequence of decrees (Final Decree of 2004 and Supplementary Decree of 2021) and the subsequent E.P. 486/2023 and EA 637/2023, urging that Ext. P5 is legally infirm and that the remedy lies within the scope of Rule 97.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents submit that the phrase 'any person' in Order 21 Rule 97 cannot include a judgment debtor, a principle reiterated by the Supreme Court in Bhwan Lal v. Satyanarain, 1995 (1) SCC 6. They contend Ext. P4 was properly dismissed by Ext. P5 and that the petitioners have no locus to challenge the order as a legal heir of the 15th defendant. They argue there is no illegality in Ext. P5, and the petitioner must pursue remedies against the supplemental final decree (08.12.2022) under I.A. 13/2020 and related reliefs, rather than against Ext. P5.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Bhanwar Lal v. Satyanarain1995 (1) SCC 6PositiveCited to hold that the phrase 'any person' in Order 21 Rule 97 does not include a judgment debtor, supporting the court's conclusion that the petitioner lacks standing.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against PRASANNA KUMAR v. RADHAKRISHNAN AND OTHERS and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN`** ``` TUESDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 199 OF 2024 ``` ``` ORDER DATED 12.01.2024 IN EA NO.637 OF 2023 IN EP NO.486 OF 2023 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA ``` ## **`PETITIONER/PETITIONER:`** ``` PRASANNA KUMAR AGED 53 YEARS S/O. MADHAVAN, NEDUNGATTU, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523 ``` ``` BY ADVS. THOMAS T.VARGHESE PHILIP T.VARGHESE ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM V.T.LITHA K.R.MONISHA JIJO PAUL ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONER:`** - **`1 RADHAKRISHNAN AGED 61 YEARS S/O. MADHAVAN, NEDUNGATTU, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`2 PUSHPAVALLY AGED 58 YEARS D/O. BHAVANI, PUTHENPURAKKAL, KATTOOR MURI, KALAVOOR P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 522`** - **`3 GEETHA AGED 55 YEARS D/O. BHAVANI, THEKKECHIRA, CHARAMANGALAM, MUHAMMA P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 525`** - **`4 LALITHA AGED 54 YEARS D/O. BHAVANI, MARALI, PRAYAR, UDAYANAPURAM, VAIKOM P.O, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 143`** O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 2 - **`5 JAYAPRAKASH AGED 60 YEARS S/O. MADHAVAN, NADUNGATTU HOUSE, PERUMTHURUTH HOUSE KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`6 KUNJUMOL AGED 50 YEARS`** - **`D/O BHAVANI, PANATHARAKARY HOUSE, CHERTHALA EAST MURI, VARANAD, CHERTHALA P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 539`** - **`7 LEELA MOHANDAS AGED 58 YEARS`** - **`W/O LATE MOHANDAS, PERUMTHURUTH HOUSE KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`8 PRAMOD AGED 40 YEARS`** - **`S/O LATE MOHANDAS, PERUMTHURUTH HOUSE KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`9 PRASANTH AGED 38 YEARS`** - **`W/O LATE MOHANDAS, PERUMTHURUTH HOUSE KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`10 PRASAD S/O PURUSHOTHAMAN AND MANIKYA SREEMATHI, PERUMBATTU CHIRAYIL, CHARAMANGALAM MURI, VARANAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`11 SREEMATHI @ MANIKKA SREEMATHI W/OPURUSHOTHAMAN PERUMBATTUCHIRAYIL, CHARAMANGALAM MURI VARANAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`12 ANIRUDHAN S/O GOPALAN , CHANIVELIYIL, CHERUVARANAM, VARANAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`13 KUMARI W/O SETHU, PAKKUKANDAM, CHERIKKETHARA, CHEMMANADU KARA P.O, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 606`** - **`14 ARUNDHATHI W/O VISWARMBARAN, CHANIVELIYIL CHERUVARANAM, VARANAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`15 CHANDRASEKHARAN S/O. NARAYANAN, PADATHU HOUSE, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`16 ANIRUDHAN S/O. NARAYANAN, PADATHU HOUSE,PERUMTHURUTH MURI,`** O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 3 ``` KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523 ``` - **`17 PURUSHOTHAMAN ( DIED ) PADATHU CHIRAYIL, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`18 PONNAMMA`** - **`D/O. NARAYANANI, PADATHU HOUSE,PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`19 SARASAMMA D/O. NARAYANI, PADATHU HOUSE,PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`20 THANKAMMA D/O. NARAYANANI, PADATHU HOUSE,PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`21 SANTHA W/O. SUKUMARAN ( DIED ) PERUMBATTU CHIRAYIL, VARANAM P.O, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`22 PRADEEP`** - **`S/O. SUKUMARAN PERUMBATTU CHIRAYIL, VARANAM P.O, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`23 GEETHA @MINI D/O. SANTHA AND SUKUMARAN PERUMBATTU CHIRAYIL, VARANAM P.O, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`24 RAVEENDRAN S/O RAMAN PADIKKETHARA HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, VAIKAPRAYAR P.O, VAIKOM KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 146`** - **`25 VISWAMBARAN S/O. RAMAN, PADIKKETHARA HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, VAIKAPRAYAR P.O, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 146`** - **`26 RADHA D/O. RAMAN AND NARAYANI, PADIKKETHARA HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, VAIKAPRAYAR P.O, VAIKOM KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 146`** - **`27 LEELA D/O. RAMAN AND NARAYANI, PADIKKETHARA HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, VAIKAPRAYAR P.O, VAIKOM KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 146`** - **`28 MALLIKA`** - **`W/O SUKUMARAN , PADIKKETHARA HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, VAIKAPRAYAR P.O, VAIKOM KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 146`** - **`29 DEVARAJAN`** O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 4 ``` S/O. KESAVAN, PADATHU HOUSE, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523 ``` - **`30 PRAKASAN S/O. KESAVAN, PADATHU HOUSE, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`31 PRASANNA D/O. NAGAMMA AND KESAVAN, PADATHU HOUSE, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`32 SUMALATHA @ SUMA /O. LAKSHMI AND KESAVAN, PADATHU HOUSE, PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`33 PRABHAVATHI@ USHA W/O ANIRUDHAN, CHANIVELIYIL, CHERUVATANAM MURI, VARANAM P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`34 AJI @ AJIMOL D/O ANIRUDHAN, CHANIVELIYIL, CHERUVATANAM MURI, VARANAM P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`35 ARUN S/O ANIRUDHAN, CHANIVELIYIL, CHERUVATANAM MURI, VARANAM P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 555`** - **`36 KUNJUMANI W/O. LATE PURUSHOTHAMAN, PADATHU HOUSE,PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`37 AKHIL S/O. PURUSHAN @ PURUSHOTHAMAN, PADATHU HOUSE,PERUMTHURUTH MURI, KANJIKUZHI VILLAGE, S.L. PURAM P.O ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 523`** - **`38 VISWANATHAN NAIR VALIYAKULANGARA VELI, MARUTHORVATTOM, CMC 16, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 539`** - **`39 VIJAYALAKSHMI D/O. LATE MINIMOL @ MINI, VALIYAKULANGARA VELY,MARUTHORVATTOM, CMC 16, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688 539`** ``` BY ADVS. DR V N SANKARJEE V.N.MADHUSUDANAN(K/687/1997) R.UDAYA JYOTHI(U-90) M.M.VINOD(K/778/2002) ``` O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 5 ``` M.SUSEELA(K/6/2009) KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN(K/001715/2018) VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K.(K/001575/2019) C.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR(K/000433/2017) SINEESH K.M.(K/000379/2022) ``` ``` THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 6 ## **`JUDGMENT`** ## **`Dated, this the 5[th] day of March 2024`** ``` The Petitioner herein is the petitioner in E.A.No.637/2023 preferred in E.P.No.486/2023 arising from O.S.No.403/1982 of the Principal Munsiff Court, Cherthala. The said Execution Application was filed under Order 21, Rule 97 of the Code, which was dismissed by Ext.P5 order. The challenge in this Original Petition is directed against Ext.P5 order. ``` ``` 2.Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents, this court notice that the present petitioner is a legal heir of the Original 15[th] defendant in the partition suit, O.S.No.403/1982, wherefore, he is not entitled to maintain an application under Order 21, Rule 97. The expression ‘any person’ as employed in Rule 97 cannot include a judgment debtor, as held by the Honorable Supreme Court in B h anw arL al v Satyanarayain, 1995 (1) SCC 6. It is stating the ``` 7 O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 ``` said reason that Ext.P4 application is seen dismissed vide Ext.P5. ``` ``` This court finds no illegality or infirmity with respect to Ext.P5, wherefore, the challenge in this Original Petition fails and the same will stand dismissed. It is clarified that the petitioner will be at liberty to pursue such other remedy, if any, available in law as against the supplemental final decree passed in I.A.No.13/2020, as also, the delivery sought for on the basis of such supplemental final decree dated 08.12.2022. ``` ``` C.JAYACHANDRAN, JUDGE ``` ``` SSG ``` O.P.(C). No.199 of 2023 8 ## **`APPENDIX OF OP(C) 199/2024`** ``` PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF FINAL DECREE PASSED IN I.A NO. 1778 OF 1995 IN O.S NO. 403 OF 1982 DATED 20.01.2004 ``` - **`Exhibit P2`** ``` TRUE COPY OF SUPPLEMENTARY FINAL DECREE DATED 24.09.2021 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA ``` - **`Exhibit P3`** ``` TRUE COPY OF E.P NO. 486/2023 IN O.S NO. 403/1982 DATED 10.10.2023 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA ``` ``` Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF E.A NO. 637/2023 IN E.P NO. 486/2023 IN O.S. NO. 403/1982 DATED 01.12.2023 BEFORE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA ``` - **`Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 12.01.2024 IN E.A NO. 637/2023 IN E.P NO. 486/2023 IN O.S. NO. 403/1982 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA`** - **`RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS Exhibit R10(a) True copy of the supplementary final decree dated 8.12.2022 in I.A. No.13/2020 in O.S.No.403/1982 of the Munsiff's Court, Cherthala`** ``` Exhibit R10(b)True copy of the preliminary decree dated 31.8.1988 in O.S.No.403/1982 of the Munsiff's Court, Cherthala ``` - **`Exhibit R10(c) True copy of the judgment dated 31.8.1988 in O.S. No.403/1982 of the Munsiff's Court, Cherthala`** - **`Exhibit R10(d) True copy of the judgment dated 10.8.1994 in A.S.No.59/1988 of the Sub Curt, Cherthala`** ``` Exhibit R10(e)True copy of the objection dated 2.12.2023 in E.A. No. 637/2023 in E.P. No. 486/2023 on the file of the Principal Munsiff's Court, Cherthala ```