High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; No order as to costs and with dire...

Prasad v. Special Tahsildar (L.R.), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.R), Ottapalam, Palakkad-679104

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G)
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-30
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M.146/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017) and the accompanying judgment.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; No order as to costs and with directions to dispose S.M.146/2021 as per Narayanan Namboodiri directions within the statutory framework.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Prasad, aged 54 years

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottapalam, Palakkad-679104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C Vidya - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Prasad, filed W.P(C).No.8268 of 2021 under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.146/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam. The suo motu proceeding, initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, concerns the vesting of landlord rights in Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and the issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14, for 0.0792 hectares of land in Sy.No.452/20, Block 89, Lakkidi Peroor-II, Palakkad. The petitioner alleges delay and seeks expeditious disposal. The Government Pleader for the respondent counters with the court’s view on pendency and the need for orderly processing, emphasizing seniority in disposal. The Court cites Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017, judgment dated 14.03.2018), which held that Land Tribunals must follow seniority and adopt expeditious procedures, including obtaining reports via Village Officers and prioritizing senior citizens. Relying on those directions, the Court directs disposal of S.M.146/2021 strictly in accordance with law, and with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226, Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14Section 99, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.146/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, arguing that timely resolution is essential for the petitioner’s rights, including potential loan formalities and the effective administration of land rights pending under Section 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent state, through the Government Pleader, contends with the pendency of Suo Motu proceedings (approximately 2434) and stresses adherence to seniority and established protocols. The government also points to the directions issuing via Narayanan Namboodiri and the 2018 government order, arguing that expeditious disposal must occur within statutory frames and senior cases prioritized, rather than arbitrary prioritization.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 (and connected cases)PositiveCited as the governing precedent for expeditious disposal, seniority-based processing, and use of Village Officers for reports; the court explicitly adopts the directions from this judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Prasad v. Special Tahsildar (L.R.), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.R), Ottapalam, Palakkad-679104 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **PRASAD, AGED 54 YEARS S/O LATE.RAMAKRISHNAN, KALLINGAL VEEDU, GANDHI SEVA SADANAM.P.O, LAKKIDI PERUR-II VILLAGE, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LR), OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD-679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.146/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0792 Hectares of land comprised in Sy.No.452/20 in Block No.89 of Lakkidi Peroor-II Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -6- directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Lakkidi Peroor-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.146/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 24.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam is 2434. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam can be directed to dispose of W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -7- S.M.No.146/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.146/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8268 OF 2021(G) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24.02.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN SM 1461/2021.**