High CourtDivision BenchPetition disposed of.

PRADEEP GOYAL v. UNION OF INDIA

Case / Petition Number:Writ Petition Civil No. 320 of 2022
Neutral Citation:[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1143

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • M. R. Shah
  • B. V. Nagarathna
Judgment Date
2022-07-18
Court Decision / Holding
We dispose of the writ petition by directing the Union of India / GST Council to issue advisory / instructions / recommendations to the respective States regarding the implementation of the system of electronic (digital) generation of a DIN in indirect tax administration, which is already being implemented by Karnataka and Kerala. We impress upon the concerned States to consider implementing the DIN system for all communications sent by State Tax Officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons to bring transparency and accountability in indirect tax administration at the earliest.
Final Disposition
Petition disposed of.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • PRADEEP GOYAL

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • GST Council

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Ms. Charu Mathur

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Balbir Singh
  • • M. K. Maroria
  • • Prahlad Singh
  • • Mohd. Akhil
  • • G Divyansh H. Rathi
  • • Anmol Chandan
  • • Naman Tandon
  • • Shyam Gopal
  • • Samarvir Singh

Case Synopsis & Summary

PRADEEP GOYAL v. UNION OF INDIA concerns a writ petition under Article 32 seeking standardisation of document identification number (DIN) generation for all communications issued by state tax authorities to taxpayers and other stakeholders. The petitioner, a Chartered Accountant, argues that implementing an electronic (digital) DIN system would promote transparency, accountability, and good governance in indirect tax administration, curbing potential misuses such as pre-dating communications and post-facto approvals. The Prime Minister had directed actions to reduce harassment and improve service to honest taxpayers; CBDT had already implemented DIN for its communications since 01.10.2019. The petition contends that the DIN system should be adopted across the states; as of now only Karnataka and Kerala have implemented it in the indirect tax framework. The GST Council, under Article 279A, can make recommendations to states on GST matters and issue advisories. The Union of India does not dispute the principle but submits that the DIN implementation must be undertaken by the states themselves, with the Council issuing advisories. The Court disposes by directing the Union/ GST Council to issue advisory/recommendations to states to implement the DIN system, and urges states to consider implementing the system to enhance transparency and accountability, thereby disposing the petition.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 32 of the Constitution of IndiaArticle 279A of the Constitution of India

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • null

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues that instituting an electronic (digital) DIN system for all communications from state tax officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons would significantly enhance transparency and accountability in indirect tax administration, reducing opportunities for misuse such as backdating or ratifying altered documents. Citing Prime Ministerial directives and the 2019 CBDT DIN implementation, the petitioner contends that the GST Council has a constitutional mandate under Article 279A to facilitate a uniform approach and can issue advisories to states to implement the DIN system. It is urged that such a system would promote good governance, minimize harassment of honest taxpayers, and align indirect tax administration with broader e-governance objectives. The petitioner seeks a writ directing the Union/ GST Council to issue advisories or recommendations to states and to encourage nationwide adoption of DIN for government communications.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents acknowledge that a DIN system would enhance transparency and accountability, but contend that implementation lies with the states themselves and requires state-level action. They emphasize that under Article 279A, the GST Council can make recommendations and issue advisories to states, but it is the states that must adopt the DIN system in practice. They point out that, to date, only Karnataka and Kerala have implemented DIN in indirect tax communications and frame the directive as a matter of cooperative federalism rather than a mandamus to the Union. The Union asserts that advisories are appropriate instruments for encouraging adoption, and that a centralised DIN across the entire country should be contingent upon state readiness and administrative feasibility. The respondents rely on constitutional allocation of powers and the need for a state-level rollout with supervisory guidance from the Council.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against PRADEEP GOYAL v. UNION OF INDIA and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

1143 [2022] 6 S.C.R. 1143 ## PRADEEP GOYAL A v. UNION OF INDIA (Writ petition (Civil) No. 320 of 2022) ## JULY 18, 2022 B ## **[M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARTHNA, JJ.]** _Tax administration: GST Council – In the instant case, petitioner filed writ petition seeking directions to respective states and GST Council to implement a system for electronic (digital) generation of Document Identification Number (DIN) for all the communication sent to taxpayers and other concerned persons – Held: Implementation of electronic generation of a DIN would be in larger public interest and enhance good governance – As of now, only two states have implemented electronic DIN system – Art.279A of Constitution of India states that GST council is empowered to make recommendation to the states on the matter of GST – Council can also issue advisories to the respective states for implementation of DIN system – Directions passed to the Union of India/GST Council to issue advisory/instructions/recommendations to respective states in regard to aforementioned system – Directions passed to the concerned states to implement the system so as to bring transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration – Guidelines/Directions._ CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition Civil No. 320 of 2022. C D E F Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India Ms. Charu Mathur, Adv. for the Petitioner. Balbir Singh, ASG, M. K. Maroria, Prahlad Singh, Mohd. Akhil, G Divyansh H. Rathi, Anmol Chandan, Naman Tandon, Shyam Gopal, Samarvir Singh, Advs. for the Respondents. H 1143 1144 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 6 S.C.R. A The Order of the Court was passed by ## **M. R. SHAH, J.** 1. By way of this Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a Chartered Accountant by profession, by way of B present Public Interest Ligation has prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents – respective States and the GST Council to take all necessary steps to implement a system for electronic (digital) generation of a Document Identification Number (DIN) for all communications sent by the State Tax Officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons. C 1.1 It is also prayed to direct the GST Council to consider and take a policy decision in respect of implementation of the DIN system by all the States. 2. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that by implementing a D system for electronic (digital) generation of a DIN, it will usher in transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration. It is submitted that as such the same is the Government’s objective. It is submitted that the same may prevent any abuse by the Departmental Officers of pre-dating communications and ratifying actions by authorizations subsequently made out in the files. ## E 2.1 It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that even Hon’ble the Prime Minister of India had earlier asked the Department of Revenue to come up with specific measures to ensure that the honest taxpayers are not harassed and served better. It is submitted that in pursuance of the F directions issued by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, the Central Government had taken a decision as far as back in the year 2019 to implement the DIN system of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). It is submitted that as per the press note issued by the Ministry of Finance on and from 01.10.2019, every CBDT communication will have to have a Document Identification Number (DIN). ## G 2.2 It is averred that the Document Identification Number system, which will bring in transparency and accountability in the tax administration and, as on today, the same has been implemented only by two States, i.e., the States of Karnataka and Kerala. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that GST Council as per Article 279A of H 1145 PRADEEP GOYAL v. UNION OF INDIA [M. R. SHAH, J.] the Constitution of India can make recommendations to the States on A any matter relating to GST. Therefore, when implementation of the DIN system is in the larger public interest and the objective to implement the DIN system is to bring in transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration, it is prayed to direct the respondents – States to implement the DIN system. It is prayed to direct the Central Government B / CBIC / GST Council to issue directions to the concerned States to implement the DIN system in respect of all communications sent by the State Tax Officers to assessees, taxpayers and other concerned persons. 3. On the copy of the writ petition being served pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 11.07.2022, Shri Balbir Singh, learned ASG has appeared on behalf of Union of India. He has submitted that Union of India does not dispute that by implementing a system for electronic (digital) generation of a DIN, it will bring in transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration. He has submitted that even as desired by Hon’ble the Prime Minister of India, the Central Government had taken a decision to implement the DIN system of Central Board of Direct Taxes and on and from 01.10.2019, every CBDT communication will have to have a Document Identification Number (DIN). It is submitted that however, so far as the implementation of the system for electronic (digital) generation of a DIN for all communications sent by the State Tax Officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons is concerned, the same is to be done and/or implemented by the concerned States. It is submitted that it is true that the GST Council in exercise of powers under Article 279A of the Constitution of India can make recommendations to the States and can issue an advisory to all the States to implement the system for electronic (digital) generation of a DIN for all communications sent by the State Tax Authorities/ Officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons, as has been done and implemented by the States of Karnataka and Kerala. 4. We have heard Ms. Charu Mathur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri Balbir Singh, learned ASG appearing on behalf of Union of India. C D E F G 5. By way of this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to take all necessary steps to H 1146 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 6 S.C.R. A implement a system for electronic (digital) generation of a Document Identification Number(DIN) for all communications sent by the state tax officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons; b. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order B or direction to the GST Council to consider and take a policy decision in respect of implementation of DIN system by all the states; c. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Central Government/CBIC to introduce C centralised DIN for the entire country; d. pass such further order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.” 6. It cannot be disputed that implementing the system for electronic D (digital) generation of a Document Identification Number (DIN) for all communications sent by the State Tax Officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons would be in the larger public interest and enhance good governance. It will bring in transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration, which are so vital to efficient governance. Even the Central Government has also taken a decision and as such E implemented the DIN system of Central Board of Direct Taxes and on and from 01.10.2019, as every CBDT communication will have to have a Document Identification Number (DIN). But, as on today, only two States, namely, the States of Karnataka and Kerala have implemented the system for electronic (digital) generation of a DIN in the indirect tax F administration, which is laudable and to be appreciated. 7. In view of the implementation of the GST and as per Article 279A of the Constitution of India, the GST Council is empowered to make recommendations to the States on any matter relating to GST. The GST Council can also issue advisories to the respective States for G implementation of the DIN system, which shall be in the larger public interest and which may bring in transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration. Therefore, we dispose of the present writ petition by directing the Union of India / GST Council to issue advisory / instructions/recommendations to the respective States regarding implementation of the system of electronic (digital) generation of a DIN H 1147 PRADEEP GOYAL v. UNION OF INDIA [M. R. SHAH, J.] in the indirect tax administration, which is already being implemented by A the States of Karnataka and Kerala. We impress upon the concerned States to consider to implement the system for electronic (digital) generation of a DIN for all communications sent by the State Tax Officers to taxpayers and other concerned persons so as to bring in transparency and accountability in the indirect tax administration at the earliest. B With this, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Registry is directed to send copy of this order to the Chief Secretary of all the Respondent States in the Country to take note of the present order and take further steps in the matter. C Devika Gujral Petition disposed of. D E F G H