Pinak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India and ors.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- M. R. Shah
- C. T. Ravikumar
- Judgment Date
- 2023-03-29
- Court Decision / Holding
- The Court disposed of the IA with directions: out of the total Rs. 24,979.67 crores lying in the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account, Rs. 5,000 crores shall be transferred to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, who shall disburse the amount against the legitimate dues of the depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies, in a transparent manner on proper identification and proof of deposits. The disbursement shall be supervised by Justice R. Subhash Reddy with assistance from Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal, and payments shall be made directly to depositors’ bank accounts. An honorarium of Rs. 15 lakhs per month for Justice Reddy and Rs. 5 lakhs per month for the Amicus is provided. The amount shall be paid to the respective depositors at the earliest but not later than nine months from today, and the balance shall be redeposited into the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account. The IA is disposed of accordingly.
- Final Disposition
- I.A. disposed of.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Union of India
Respondents
- Pinak Pani Mohanty
- Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies (including Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd., Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Ltd)
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Shri Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General
- • Ankit Gyan (assisted by Aarsh Choudhary)
Counsels for Respondents
- • Ms. Aishwarya Bhati
- • Balbir Singh
- • Rajat Nair
- • Madhav Sinhal
- • Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara
- • Arvind Kumar Sharma
- • Mukesh Kumar Maroria
- • Pratyush Srivastava
- • Prasenjeet Mohapatra
- • Ms. Nitya Thakur
- • Tonmoy Dera
- • Rajeet Roy
- • Tarini Prasad Tripathy
- • Dhananjay Bhaskar Ray
Case Synopsis & Summary
Pinak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India and ors. concerns an IA filed by the Union of India seeking directions to transfer a substantial sum from the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies for disbursement to the genuine depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies. The Union contends that Rs. 24,979.67 crores lie unutilized in the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account, deposited pursuant to directions of this Court, and that a portion amounting to Rs. 5,000 crores should be earmarked and transferred to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies to be disbursed against legitimate deposits of the Sahara Group. It is argued that the funds, which include amounts connected to Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. and other Sahara entities, should be paid to the depositors in a transparent, properly identified manner upon submission of proof of deposits and claims, with supervision to ensure integrity. The Court, after hearing, directed that Rs. 5,000 crores be transferred to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies to disburse to genuine depositors, under supervision of former Judge Justice R. Subhash Reddy and Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal, to ensure payments directly into depositors’ bank accounts. The order provides for an honorarium for the supervising judge and Amicus and sets a nine-month deadline for disbursement, with any balance to be redeposited in the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account. The IA stands disposed of on these terms.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
Union of India submitted that Rs 24,979.67 crores lie in the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account unutilized and that Rs 5,000 crores should be transferred to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies to disburse the genuine depositors’ dues in a transparent, verifiable manner, to be paid directly to depositors upon proper identification and proof of deposits. The disbursement should be supervised by Justice R. Subhash Reddy with Amicus Curiae, and the process should be completed within nine months. Honorarium for the supervising judge and Amicus is provided. The funds are to be disbursed to the genuine depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies.
Contentions of Respondents
The document does not provide explicit separate pleadings from the respondents within the excerpt; their counsel is noted, but specific arguments from respondents are not articulated in the text provided.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Pinak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India and ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.