High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions

Pathummamma v. Land Tribunal (Devaswom) and Deputy Collector (LR), Malappuram District

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-02
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment (and as supra), i.e., give priority to senior citizens and dispose cases on seniority with a view to expeditious disposal. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Pathummamma, aged 68 years, d/o KalantHan Haji, Thayyil House, Nannambra P.O., Malappuram District

Respondents

  • Land Tribunal (Devaswom) Collectorate, UP Hill.P.O., Malappuram-676505
  • Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Collectorate, UP Hill.P.O., Malappuram District-676505

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri U.K.Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K.Amminikutty - Sr Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Pathummamma, an elderly resident (aged 68) of Malappuram district, petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to the Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 before the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram. The suo motu proceeding was initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the same Rules, in respect of about 6.88 acres of land in Sy.No.351/6-1, Nannambra Village. The petitioner argues that she is a senior citizen and that the court should ensure an expeditious disposal of such matters; it notes the large pendency (over 8,500 suo motu cases) and highlights directions issued in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017) to prioritize senior citizens and dispose cases on seniority basis, including use of Village Officers for reports. The court accepts the need for speed but insists on adherence to seniority and the established directives, directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 strictly in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions. No order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for expeditious disposal of S.M.No.11/2021; she is a senior citizen requiring swift disposal to facilitate financial arrangements (loan) and to clear statutory entitlements under the Land Reforms Act. Reliance is placed on the Court’s earlier directions in Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure disposal in seniority order and use of Village Officers for report gathering, with a view to expediting cases while maintaining procedural fairness. The petitioner emphasizes that pendency is substantial (thousands of suo motu proceedings) and that co-operation with the Tribunal for notices and reports would aid expeditious disposal, without breaking the seniority framework. The Court’s backing of senior citizens’ priority and the need for expeditious yet lawful processing is urged. respondents:"The respondents highlight the heavy pendency before the Land Tribunal and stress that disposal must respect the established seniority of cases. They cite the Narayanan Namboodiri guidance, including prioritizing senior citizens and following a time-bound approach (six months for senior-citizen matters and up to 18 months for others), and acknowledge Government directives (GO 2018) to assist Tribunals with timely reports through Village Officers. The respondents argue for adherence to due process, routine procedures, and that any out-of-turn processing would undermine the overall pipeline and judicial directions."},

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling precedent for expeditious disposal and prioritization of senior-citizen matters; the present judgment follows its directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Pathummamma v. Land Tribunal (Devaswom) and Deputy Collector (LR), Malappuram District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **PATHUMMAMMA, AGED 68 YEARS D/O KALANTHAN HAJI, THAYYIL HOUSE, NANNAMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 LAND TRIBUNAL, (DEVASWOM) COLLECTORATE, UP HILL.P.O., MALAPPURAM-676505. 2 DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, COLLECTORATE, UP HILL.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 06.88 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.351/6-1 of Nannambra Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special** WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) -3- **Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) -4- the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) -5- free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) -6- shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Nannambra Village, the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.11/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 dated 08.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 68 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram is 8514. WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- WP(C).No.5413 OF 2021(B) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 08/01/2021 IN SM.NO.1182021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.**