Parasuraman, Manikandan, Chandran and Lakshmi Panikathiar Kalarikkal v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Pattambi

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 23RD MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **1 PARASURAMAN, AGED 57 YEARS S/O.A.P.NARAYANAN, DWARAKA NIVAS, AYAKKADU GRAMAM, VADAKKENCHERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 MANIKANDAN, S/O.APPUKUTTAN, KANJIRAMKULAMKULAMBU, ERATTAKULAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3 CHANDRAN, S/O.LATE RAMANEZHUTHACHAN, MELARCODE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4 LAKSHMI PANIKATHIAR KALARIKKAL, ANIKODU, MATHUR VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.R.VENKATESH SRI.G.KEERTHIVAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LAND TRIBUNAL, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679 303.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.2464/2016 in the name of the 1[st] petitioner; S.M.No.312/2014 in the name of the 2[nd] petitioner; S.M.No.602/2018 in the name of the 3[rd] petitioner; and S.M.No.2192/2018 in the name of the 4[th] petitioner, on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, are for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property of the 1[st] petitioner comprised in Re.Sy.No.540/6 and 541/11 in Block No.34 of Vadakkenchery-I Village in Palakkad District; the W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -3- property of the 2[nd] petitioner in Re.Sy.No.369/11 in Block No.30 of Kavassery-I Village; the property of the 3[rd] petitioner having an extent of 0.143 hectares of land in Re.Sy.No.411 in Block No.25 of Melarcode-I Village; and the property of the 4[th] petitioner having an extent of 0.0323 hectares of land in Re.Sy.No.5/1 in Block No.14 of Mathur Village. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -4- result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -5- cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land ## W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -6- Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer of Vadakkenchery-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.2464/2016 in the case of the 1[st] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 29.09.2016. Based on the report of the Village Officer, W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -7- Kavassery-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.312/2014 in the case of the 2[nd] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P2 receipt dated 23.01.2014; based on the report of the Village Officer of Melarcode-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.602/2018 in the case of the 3[rd] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 23.02.2018; based on the report of the Village Officer of Mathur Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.2192/2018 in the case of the 4[th] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P4 receipt dated 19.09.2018, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the properties referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -8- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.Nos.2464/2016, 312/2014, 602/2018 and 2192/2018 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.Nos.2464/2016, 312/2014, 602/2018 and 2192/2018, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.3726 OF 2021(M) -9- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM NO.2464/2016 DATED 29/09/2016 IN THE NAME OF 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM NO.312/2014 IN THE NAME OF 2ND PETITIONER.** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM NO.602/2018 DATED 23/2/2018 IN THE NAME OF 3RD PETITIONER.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM NO.2192/2018 DATED 19/9/2018 IN THE NAME OF THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.854/2018 DATED 14/3/2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.**