High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; Land Tribunal, Palakkad to dispose...

PARAMJYOTHI v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C)
Neutral Citation:W.P.(C).No.5421 of 2021

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-02
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad to dispose of S.M.No.97/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; Land Tribunal, Palakkad to dispose of S.M.No.97/2021 following Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • PARAMJYOTHI, aged 68 years S/O. LATE KESAVAN, ALAMBALLAM, MARUTHA ROAD, P.O. MARUTHA ROAD, VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD P.O. PALAKKAD 678 001

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

Paramjyothi, a 68-year-old senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct the Special Tahsildar (LR) and the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to expeditiously conduct enquiry and dispose of S.M.No.97/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal. The suo motu proceedings were initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the said Rules. The petitioner contends the delay harms a senior citizen and notes the huge pendency of matters (3342) before the Palakkad tribunal. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), which directed expeditious disposal on seniority and allowed flexible report gathering by village officers. On considering the submissions, the court directs disposal of S.M.No.97/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions and the Go order mandating village officers’ assistance. The order closes with no costs and aims to preserve seniority while ensuring timely resolution.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by Land Tribunals
  • Disposal of senior citizens' cases on seniority basis
  • Not breaking the existing seniority of cases
  • Village Officers assisting Land Tribunals to obtain required reports

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.97/2021 in the Land Tribunal; emphasizes the petitioner’s age (68) and the need for timely relief; relies on guidance from Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal on seniority.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents acknowledge pendency in the Land Tribunal (3342 cases) and urge following due process and seniority-based disposal; highlight GO 2018 RD directive to obtain information via Village Officers and the Bank-linked need for a timely resolution.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as precedent for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions; the present court follows the directions laid down in this decision.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against PARAMJYOTHI v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **PARAMJYOTHI, AGED 68 YEARS S/O. LATE KESAVAN, ALAMBALLAM, MARUTHA ROAD, P.O. MARUTHA ROAD, VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD P.O. PALAKKAD 678 001.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.97/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.2580 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.335/25 in Block No.38 of Marutharoad Village in Palakkad Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Marutharoad Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.97/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 28.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 68 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.97/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.97/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5421 OF 2021(C) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 28.01.2021.**