High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; Petitioner’s writ petition dispose...

P. Sugathan v. Deputy Collector (LRG-7), Office of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-10
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.705/2015 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017) and as clarified in the present judgment; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; Petitioner’s writ petition disposed with directions to the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.705/2015 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri guidelines.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • P. Sugathan

Respondents

  • Deputy Collector (LRG-7) Office of the Land Tribunal, Collectorate, Palakkad, Palakkad - 678001

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • A.C. Vidya — Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus to compel the Deputy Collector (LRG-7) to expeditiously conduct an enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.705/2015 before the Land Tribunal, Palakkad. The Land Tribunal had initiated suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the same Rules. The petitioner is a 68-year-old senior citizen; the respondent argued that the total pendency of suo motu proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad runs into thousands (3342). The High Court refers to Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, judgment dated 14.03.2018), noting that it cautioned against breaking the normal queue and stressed disposal on seniority basis, prioritizing senior citizens and following seniority for other cases. It also summarizes the directions from that decision for expeditious disposal, including obtaining reports via Village Officers and adherence to timelines. The Court notes Government Order GO 9/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 forming part of the judgment. Ultimately, the Court disposes of the petition by directing the Palakkad Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.705/2015 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, without costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Suo motu proceedings as a procedural instrument
  • Seniority of registration to govern disposal sequence in Land Tribunals
  • Priority to senior citizens for expeditious disposal of cases
  • Disposal of cases strictly in accordance with law without breaking the established seniority (as laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that as a 68-year-old senior citizen, he is entitled to expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.705/2015. He relies on the need for prompt resolution of land reform certificates and urges the Land Tribunal to follow the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri to prevent undue delays and to dispose the case on the basis of seniority, with use of Village Officers for reports if needed, so that the case does not stand in queue behind unrelated matters.

Contentions of Respondents

The Government Pleader argues that there is a substantial pendency of suo motu proceedings (3342) and that disposal must proceed in a manner consistent with law and administrative procedures. The respondent relies on the established framework under the Kerala Land Reforms Act and the 2018 Government Order to ensure proper notices and coordinated reporting, while emphasizing that the Land Tribunal must not bypass the normal seniority-based disposal and that expeditious disposal must still respect due process.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment for expeditious disposal directions and the seniority-based disposal framework, incorporating those directives into the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against P. Sugathan v. Deputy Collector (LRG-7), Office of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 19TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **P.SUGATHAN, AGED 68 YEARS S/O. KUNJAN, PANACKAL VEEDU, THENKARA P.O, KUMARAMPUTHUR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.R.G-7) OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD P.O, PALAKKAD - 678001.,** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Deputy Collector (LR.G-7) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.705/2015 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0968 Hectares of land comprised in Old Sy.Nos.70/2A2A and 70/2A2B of Kumaramputhur Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kumaramputhur Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.705/2015, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 20.11.2015, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 68 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.705/2015 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.705/2015, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6202 OF 2021(A) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 20.11.2015.**