Original Petition (Civil) No. 358 of 2013 (O), High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Thomas P. Joseph
- Judgment Date
- 2013-01-28
- Court Decision / Holding
- 1) Exhibit P5, order dated 04.01.2013 on E.A.No.221 of 2012 in E.P.No.275 of 2012 in O.S.No.3 of 1949 of the Sub Court, Kannur is set aside. 2) E.A.No.221/2012 is allowed and notice to the respondents under Rule 22(1) of Order XXI of the Code dispensed with. The Original Petition is allowed as per the above terms (dispensing with notice).
- Final Disposition
- The Original Petition is allowed; EA 221/2012 is allowed; Exhibit P5 order set aside; notice under Rule 22(1) dispensed with.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- KALLUKETTIYA PEEDIKAYIL KARUKKANPADINHARE PURAYIL SOHARABI
Respondents
- KALLUKETTIYA PEEDIKAYIL KARUKKANPADINJARE PURAYIL KUNHIALI UMMA, AGED 63 YEARS D/O.MAMMAD, AZHIKODE P.O. KANNUR TALUK & DISTRICT, PIN-670009
- SON MAMMED KUNHI, AGED 43 YEARS, TRADER, RESIDING AT -DO-
- BROTHER -DO- ABDULLAKUNHI, AGED 40 YEARS, TRADER, RESIDING AT -DO-
- BROTHER - DO- ABDUL JABBAR, AGED 40 YEARS, -DO-
- P.P.HAMSU, AGED 44 YEARS S/O.RUKHIYA, AZHIKODE (P.O.) KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670009
- BROTHER MUHAMMED ASHRAF, AGED 40 YEARS, BUSINESS, DO.
- SISTER SAFOORA, AGED 37 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, DO.
- BROTHER SAFEEQUE, AGED 35 YEARS, COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DO.
- SISTER SAINABA, AGED 34 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, DO.
- BROTHER MUHAMMED KASIM, AGED 27 YEARS, BUSINESS, DO.
- MAMMAD KUNHI S/O AYISSU, RESIDING
- K.P.SAINAVA, AGED 67 YEARS D/O AYISSU, RESIDING AT FAIZAL MANZIL, POOTHAPPARA P.O., AZHIKODE, KANNUR, PIN-670009
- SISTER KATHEESUMMA, AGED 54 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, AMSOM DESOM P.O. AZHIKODE, KANNUR-670009
- SISTER K.P.KADIJA, AGED 57 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, AZHIKODE AMSOM AND DESOM, KANNUR
- BROTHER UMMERKUNJI, RESIDING AT -DO-
- SISTER K.P.SAINAVA, AGED 78 YEARS D/O KUNHIPATHU, NO OCCUPATION, AZHIKODE AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR-670009
- K.P.KUNHAMSU, AGED 60 YEARS S/O SAINAVA, BUSINESS, AZHIKODE AMSOM DESOM
- SISTER K.P.MARIYAM, AGED 58 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, RESIDING AT -DO-
- SISTER K.P.RABI, AGED 48 YEARS -DO-
- SISTER K.P.KUNHAISSU, AGED 54 YEARS -DO-
- BROTHER K.P.UMMERKUNHI, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, -DO-
- SISTER K.P.KUNHAMINA, NO OCCUPATION, RESIDING AT -DO-
- SISTER K.P.ASSIMA, AGED 49 YEARS, -DO-
- BROTHER K.P.EBRAHIM KUNHI, AGED 47 YEARS, -DO-
- BROTHER K.P.MAMMAD KUNHI, AGED 45 YEARS, -DO-
- THARAYIL PEEDIKAYIL KAZHUNGIL KUNHAMINA D/O RABIYA UMMA, RESIDING AT -DO-
- POOVSAN KULATHIL HAMEED -DO-
- BROTHER UMMER KUNHI RESIDING AT -DO-
- YOUNGER SISTER SAINAVA, AGED 48 YEARS -DO-
- SON EBRAHIM KUTTY, AGED 41 YEARS, TRADER, AZHIKODE AMSOM, DESOM KANNUR
- YOUNGER BROTHER KUNHAMU, AGED 39 YEARS -DO-
- SISTER ASMABI, AGED 41 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, -DO-
- BROTHER AGED 39 YEARS SHAHUL HAMEED, TRADER, -DO-
- BROTHER MUSTHAFA, TRADER, -DO-
- YOUNGER BROTHER RASHEED, AGED 28 YEARS -DO-
- SISTER SUBAIDA, AGED 28 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, -DO-
- NADUVILEKANDY PUTHIYAPURAYIL ASMABI D/O HUSSAIN KUNHI PALLIKUNNU AMSOM, CHALAD DESOM, KANNUR-670002
- SON ABDUL SALAM, AGED 48 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- YOUNGER BROTHER HAMEED, AGED 46 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- YOUNGER BROTHER ESSA, AGED 43 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- SISTER SAIBU, AGED 51 YEARS, ON OCCUPATION, -DO-
- SISTER JAMEELA, AGED 39 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, -DO-
- SISTER RAZIA, AGED 42 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, RESIDING AT PALLIKUNNU AMSOM CHALAD DESOM, KANNUR
- MADATHILE PEEDIKAYIL PARAKANDY KUNHAMINA, AGED 58 YEARS W/O CHERIYA ABDULLA, AZHIKODE AMSOM, DESOM KANNUR-670009
- SON HAMEED, AGED 38 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BROTHER UMMER (R 48), AGED 36 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- SISTER AYISSU, AGED 42 YEARS, DO
- PARAPRATH KOTTAKKEN VALAPPIL KUNHAMINA, AGED 48 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, AZHIKODE AMSOM, DESOM KANNUR-670009
- SON ABDULLA, AGED 28 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BROTHER RAFI, AGED 26 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BROTHER ISMAIL, AGED 22 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BAPPIREMBETH SAINABA, AGED 53 YEARS W/O ABOOBACKER, NEAR PANCHAYATH OFFICE, PAYYANNUR-670307
- SON RAFEEQUE, AGED 40 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- SISTER RAYIYANATH, AGED 38 YEARS, DO-DO-
- BROTHER KUNHAMSA, AGED 37 YEARS, DO-DO-
- SISTER FATHIMA, NO OCCUPATION, -DO-
- BROTHER ABDUL FATHAHRL, AGED 33 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- P. SUBEER, AGED 43 YEARS S/O KAMMU, EMPLOYEE K.S.R.T.C., DO-DO-
- KELOTH KATHIJA, AGED 58 YEARS, TRADER, D/O SUBEER, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL KANNUR-670001
- SON NEJIMU, AGED 35 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BROTHER ASHRAF, AGED 33 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BROTHER MOHAMMED HASHIM, AGED 31 YEARS, DO-DO-
- BROTHER MUHAMED MUSTHAFA, AGED 29 YEARS, DO-DO-
- BROTHER NAZER, AGED 27 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- YOUNGER BROTHER RAFI, AGED 25 YEARS, TRADER, -DO-
- BAPPIREMBETH RASHEEDA, AGED 28 YEARS D/O KUNHIPATHU, NO OCCUPATION, POOTHAPARA AZHIKODE AMSOM DESOM KANNUR-670009
- PARAPPRETH KOTTAKKEN NBABEESU, AGED 68 YEARS W/O LATE MOIDU MOIDEEN KUTTY, -DO-
- SON DR. ABDUL KHADER, AGED 47 YEARS, DOCTOR, -DO-
- SISTER SAIBUNEESA, AGED 41 YEARS NO OCCUPATION, RESIDING AT DO-DO-
- BROTHER ABOOBACKER, AGED 43 YEARS BUSINESS, -DO-
- SISTER SOUDHA, AGED 39 YEARS NO OCCUPATION, DO-DO-
- SISTER SEENATH, AGED 37 YEARS, DO-DO-
- V.P. SAIBUNNISSA, AGED 33 YEARS W/O ABDUL SALAM, VAYARAN PUTHAMPURAYIL HOSUE NEAR G.T.H. SCHOOL, KANNUR-670001
- DAUGHTER, AGED 21 YEARS
- SISTER V.P. SAJNA (MINOR, AGED 15 YEARS REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN V.P. SIBUNNISA 74TH RESPONDENT)
- BROTHER V.P. SAJIR (MINOR, AGED 13 YEARS, DO-DO-
- P.K.MAHAMOOD S/O RABI, PARAPRATH KOTTAKKAN HOUSE CHEMMARASSERI PARA, AZHIKODE AMSOM, DESOM KANNUR 670 009.
- BROTHER P.K.ABOOBACKER -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.UMMERKUNHI -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.HAMEED PROPRIETOR, DELIGHT BLINDING, KANNUR 670 001
- P.K.MOIDU PARAPRATH KOTTAKAN HOUSE CHEMMARASSERI PARA AZHIKODE P.O, KANNUR 670 009
- BROTHER P.K.IBRAHIM KUTTY -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.ABRUL RAHIMAN -DO-
- SISTER P.K.NABEESUTHUL MISIRIA -DO-
- SISTER P.K.ASMABI -DO-
- SISTER P.K.SAINABA -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.MUSTHAFA -DO-
- P.K.MARIYUMMA D/O ABDULKHADER, PARAPRATH KOTTAKKAN HOUSE CHEMMARASSERI PARA, AZHIKODE P.O, KANNUR 670 009
- BROTHER P.K.MAMMU TRADER -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.HAMSU ELECTRICIAN -DO-
- SISTER P.K.RABI NO OCCUPATION -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.SATHAR -DO-
- SISTER P.K.JAMEELA -DO-
- SISTER P.K.ALEEMA -DO-
- BROTHER P.K.SHEFEEQUE -DO-
- SISTER P.K.RASHEEDA -DO-
- THAYATH PEEDIKAYIL SHAREEFA W/O LATE ISMAIL, NEAR KALLADATHUKKA MAJID, PUZHATHI AMSOM DESOM PUZHATHI P.O, KANNUR 670 706
- SON T.P.RIYAS BUSINESS,-DO-
- BROTHER T.P.NAHEEM -DO-
- SHAKEENA -DO-
- SISTER T.P.SAJINA -DO-
- BROTHER T.P.ILLIYAS -DO-
- VATTKANDY SHAHIDA W/O LATE K.P.HASHIM, NO OCCUPATION, A.P NIVAS KASANAKOTTA, THAYATERU, KANNUR 670 002
- M.SAIBUNNEESA W/O HASSANKUTTY, RESIDING AT SANBIYAS, KURUVA, KANNUR 670 001
- DAUGHTER M. SANUDIYA -DO-
- BROTHER M.AMEEN -DO-
- K.P.THAJUDDIN S/O MUSTHAFA, COOLIE, AZHIKODE AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR 67009
- BROTHER K.P.SAKEER HUSSAIN -DO-
- BROTHER K.P.SADIQUE AUTO DRIVER, AZHIKODE AMSOM, DESOM KANNUR 670 009
- SISTER K.P.HAIRUNNISSA -DO-
- M.P.HAMEED -DO-
- K.P.RASIYA -DO-
- K.P.SABIRA -DO-
- BROTHER K.P.MUNEER -DO-
- K.P.SHAFI -DO-
- K.P.SAMEERA -DO-
- K.P.SUBAIDA -DO-
- MUHAMMAD ALI K.P -DO-
- SUBAIDA K.P -DO-
- AYISHABI K.P -DO-
- JALEEL K.P (R126) -DO-
- AYISABI K.P -DO-
- K.P.ASMABI D/O KUNHIPATHU -DO-
- USMAN K.P AGED 33 YEARS S/O KUNHIPATHU -DO-
- K.P.RIYAS AGED 32 YEARS S/O KUNHIPATHU -DO-
- P.T.ABDURAHIMAN AGED 77 YEARS S/O KUNHIPATHU -DO-
- C.O.T.ASMA AGED 69 YEARS D/O P.P.KUNHI, NO OCCUPATION RESIDING AT THAZHATH HOUSE, KAYYATH ROAD THALASERY-670 101
- C.O.T.SHADULI AGED 45 YEARS BUSINESS, RESIDING AT THAZHATH HOUSE, KAYYATH ROAD THALASERY-670 101
- C.O.T.SIRAJ AGED 43 YEARS BUSINESS, RESIDING AT THAZHATH HOUSE, KAYYATH ROAD THALASERY-670 101
- C.O.T.VAHIDA AGED 39 YEARS TEACHER, RESIDING AT THAZHATH HOUSE, KAYYATH ROAD THALASERY-670 101
- C.O.T.NABEEDA AGED 39 YEARS NO OCCUPATION, RESIDING AT THAZHATH HOUSE KAYYATH ROAD, THALASERY-670 101
- C.O.T.SHAMEENA AGED 34 YEARS ATTENDER, RESIDING AT THAZHATH HOUSE, KAYYATH ROAD THALASERY-670 101
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • SRI.B.KRISHNAN
- • SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY
- • SRI.RAJESH V.NAIR
Case Synopsis & Summary
This Original Petition (OP(C) No. 358 of 2013) challenges an order of the Sub Court, Kannur, in EP 275/2012 arising from the final decree in O.S. No. 73 of 1949 for partition. The final decree was passed on 18-12-2008 and confirmed by the First Appellate Court on 10-11-2011. A second appeal RSA No. 923 of 2012 was disposed of by this Court on 25-09-2012 (Exhibit P4). Thereafter, the petitioner sought delivery of property and filed EA 221/2012 to dispense with notice under Rule 22(1) of Order XXI, CPC. The executing court had, by order dated 04-01-2013 (Exhibit P5), rejected the dispensing-with-notice request with no stated reasons. The petitioner argued that serving notice on 132 respondents would cause unreasonable delay and defeat the ends of justice, particularly since the appellate decree has merged the trial decree and the suit is decades old. Sub Rule 2 of Rule 22 enables dispensing with notice where service would cause delay or defeat ends of justice. The court held that the only decree to be executed is the appellate decree and exercised its discretion to set aside Exhibit P5 and to allow EA 221/2012, dispensing with notice. The petition is allowed to accelerate resolution of the long-standing litigation and prevent further delay in delivery of property.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Ends of justice
- Unreasonable delay
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner contends that dispensing with notice under Rule 22(1) of Order XXI CPC is permissible under Sub Rule 2 of Rule 22 because service on 132 respondents would cause undue delay and defeat the ends of justice. The appellate decree (Exhibit P4) merged the trial court decree, and the litigation is decades old; the ends of justice require a speedy resolution. Sub Rule 2 provides discretion to dispense with notice when serving notice would be oppressive or delay resolution. The court should set aside the executing court’s order (Exhibit P5) and allow EA 221/2012 to dispense with notice, thereby expediting delivery of property and concluding protracted litigation.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents argued for service of notice under Rule 22(1) of Order XXI CPC to all 132 respondents, raising concerns about due process and protecting rights of heirs and legal representatives. They contended that the executing court should provide reasons for dispensing with notice and that the appellate decree does not negate the need for notice. The long-pending nature of the matter and the need to protect the interests of all parties were emphasized, advocating adherence to procedural guarantees and proper service.
Cited Precedents (2)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asiruddin Mondal v. Latifannessa Bibi and others | AIR 1933 CALCUTTA 560 | Mentioned Only | Cited to support the discretionary power under Rule 22(2) of Order XXI CPC to dispense with notice; not treated as controlling precedent. |
| Jogesh Chandra Bandopadhya and another v. Mohini Mohan Ghose and others | AIR 1935 CALCUTTA 125 | Mentioned Only | Cited for analogous principle on dispensing with notice; no distinguished or overruled ruling in this judgment. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Original Petition (Civil) No. 358 of 2013 (O), High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.