High Court of KeralaDivision BenchOriginal petition allowed; Ext.P9 order set asi...

O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019

Case / Petition Number:OP (Wakf) No.30 of 2019

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • A. Hariprasad
  • Shircy V.
Judgment Date
2019-08-06
Court Decision / Holding
The original petition is allowed. Ext.P9 order is set aside. The State Wakf Board is directed to consider Ext.P6 (O.P.No.108/2019) with due notice to all parties, and to dispose of interlocutory applications within two weeks of appearance. The matter and interlocutory issues are to be expeditiously resolved, with a hearing fixed on 19.8.2019, and final disposal within three months.
Final Disposition
Original petition allowed; Ext.P9 order set aside; Wakf Board to consider Ext.P6 with notice and dispose interlocutory matters within a specified time; hearing fixed for 19.8.2019 and final disposal within three months. All interlocutory applications are closed.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Jamal A.A.
  • Jaseer.N.A.

Respondents

  • The Chief Executive Officer, Kerala State Wakf Board, Ernakulam
  • Nettoor Mahallu Muslim Jama-ath
  • P.M. Abdul Karim
  • Sayed Imbichi Koya Thangal
  • Mohammed Jiswan N.K.
  • T.B. Abdul Karim
  • Muhammedkutty K.M.
  • Jamal.K.M.
  • Mohammed Kutty C.A.
  • Mohammed Shafi.K.P.
  • Shamsudheen.V.K.
  • Arshad.A.K.
  • Jalal.K.M.
  • Kerala State Wakf Board, Ernakulam (represented by CEO)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Renjith B. Marar
  • • Sadchith.P.Kurup
  • • Lakshmi.N.Kaimal
  • • Sindhu K.S.
  • • C.P.Anil Raj

Counsels for Respondents

  • • T.P. Sajid, SC

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a Kerala High Court Division Bench judgment in O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019 concerning the Nettoor Mahallu Muslim Jama-ath. The petitioners, Jamal A.A. and Jaseer N.A., approached the Kerala StateWakf Board seeking to declare the general body meeting held on 19 April 2019 illegal, to appoint a Returning Officer to conduct elections under Board supervision, and to amend the Jama-ath bye-laws to ensure proper membership registers and a voters list, with auditor oversight of accounts. The Chief Executive Officer of the Wakf Board disposed of O.P.No.108/2019 by Ext.P9 on 23 July 2019, dismissing reliefs and stating that the reliefs to declare the 2019 election illegal would be granted only if the election itself were found illegal, while noting a related High Court decision in Ext.P5 (11 July 2019) in O.P(Wakf) No.16/2019 and advising that the petitioners may approach the appropriate authority to amend the bye-laws for better maintenance of membership and voter lists. Learned counsel for the petitioners challenged Ext.P9 as legally unsustainable and highlighted that Ext.P9 was passed on the date of Ext.P6, raising due process concerns. The court, relying on Ext.P5 and the principle that courts are loath to interfere in election processes, set aside Ext.P9, and directed the Wakf Board to consider Ext.P6 with due notice, expeditiously dispose of interlocutory applications, and schedule hearing on 19.8.2019 with a three-month deadline for final disposition.

Provisions of Law Cited

Bye-laws of Nettoor Mahallu Muslim Jama-athElection procedures under bye-laws and Returning Officer supervision by Wakf BoardMaintenance of membership registers and voters list

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Court loath to interfere in election processes

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that Ext.P9 is legally unsustainable, as it was passed on the date Ext.P6 original petition was filed, suggesting possible lack of due process. They rely on the High Court’s Ext.P5 judgment in O.P(Wakf) No.16/2019 (dated 11-07-2019), which held there was no illegality in the 2019 election and advised amendments to the bye-law to ensure proper membership registration and a voters list. They argue that the remedy lies in amending the bye-law rather than disturbing the 2019 election; they invoke Abdul Latheef C.K. v. Adv. K.M. Haneefa (2015 (3) KHC 844) to support the proposition that courts should be loathe to interfere in election processes. They request Ext.P6 be considered with proper notice, and the interlocutory applications disposed of speedily, while retaining the right to pursue bye-law amendments to safeguard subsequent elections and membership records.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents submit that Ext.P5 judgment resolves the dispute and nothing remains to be considered. The Wakf Board’s Stand is supported by the Standing Counsel, and the reliefs sought cannot be granted given the absence of illegality in the 2019 election and the prior dismissal of similar petitions. They argue that Ext.P9 reflects a settled position, and the matter should not be reopened; the court should adhere to the earlier ruling and allow the Board to proceed in consonance with bye-law adjustments and proper maintenance of records.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Abdul Latheef C.K. and others v. Adv. K.M.Haneefa and others2015 (3) KHC 844Mentioned OnlyCited to illustrate the proposition that courts should be loath to interfere in election processes; used by counsel to support a non-interference stance, not adopted as controlling authority in this case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD** ## **&** ## **THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.** **TUESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1941** ## **OP (WAKF).No.30 OF 2019** **ORDER IN OP 108/2019 DATED 23-07-2019 OF KERALA WAKF BOARD, ERNAKULAM** ## **PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1 & 2:** **1 JAMAL A.A. AGED 54 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADER,ARACKA PARAMBIL (H), NETTOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 040** **2 JASEER.N.A., AGED 32 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADER .V., NANGYARATHU PARAMBIL (H), NETTOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 040** **BY ADVS. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL SMT.SINDHU K.S. SRI.C.P.ANIL RAJ** ## **RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:** **1 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD, ERNAKULAM, VIP ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017** ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-2-:** - **2 NETTOOR MAHALLU MUSLIM JAMA-ATH,** - **NETTOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SAYED IMBICHI KOYA THANGAL, AGED 57, NADUVILE VEETTIL,NETTOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 040** - **3 P.M.ABDUL KARIM AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS** - **S/O.MOHAMMED, SECRETARY, NETTOOR MAHALLU MUSLIM JAMA-ATH, NETTOOR P.O., RESIDING AT PERINGATTUPARAMBIL, NETOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **4 SAYED IMBICHI KOYA THANGAL, AGED 57 YEARS** - **NADUVILE VEETIL,NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **5 MOHAMMED JISWAN.N.K., AGED 55 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN NADUVILE VEEDU,NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **6 T.B.ABDUL KARIM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS** - **S/O. BEERANKUTTY, THANAPPARAMBIL HOUSE,NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **7 MUHAMMEDKUTTY.K.M., AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, KALLUTHANI PARAMBIL HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **8 JAMAL.K.M., AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, KALLUKATTU HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-3-:** - **9 MOHAMMED KUTTY C.A., AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADER, CHATHENKERIL HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **10 MOHAMMED SHAFI.K.P., AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, VALIYAVEETTIL PARAMBU, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **11 SHAMSUDHEEN.V.K., AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, VETTIKATTU HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **12 ARSHAD.A.K., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O. KUNJU MUHAMMED, AZHIKKAKATHU HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **13 JALAL.K.M., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O.M.MAMMU,KANOTHU PARAMBIL (H),NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 040** - **14 KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD, ERNAKULAM VIP ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017 REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER** **BY ADV.T.P.SAJID, SC** **THIS OP (WAKF) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** **==> picture [34 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** **==> picture [286 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the contesting respondents. 2. The petitioners approached the Kerala Wakf Board, Ernakulam, with O.P.No.108 of 2019 (Ext.P6), seeking the following reliefs; “a) To declare that the general body meeting of 1[st] respondent Jama-ath convened on 19/4/2019 as illegal and void and to order for convening a fresh general body meeting as is stipulated in the Byelaw of Jama-ath. b) to conduct the election of the managing committee of 1[st] respondent Jama-ath under the control and supervision of a returning officer so appointed by the board through secret ballot after preparing a voters list of eligible voters in the Jama-ath. c) to declare that the Election (Selection) of respondents 3 to 12 as the executive committee members to the 1[st] respondent Jama-ath in the general body meeting held on 19/4/2019 as ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-5-:** illegal and to prohibit them from interfering in the management and administration of the Jama-ath and to declare that their decisions and actions no way affecting dignity and freedom of the jama-ath and its members. d) to amend the Byelaw of the Jama-ath under the control and directions of this honourable Board so as to enable the future committees to manage the affairs of 1[st] respondent Jama-ath in a legal and proper way. e) to appoint an auditor for taking control of the accounts and records of the 1[st] respondent Jama-ath and to conduct Auditing of the books of accounts.” 3. The Chief Executive Officer of the Board as per Ext.P9 cryptic order, disposed of O.P.No.108 of 2019 in the following manner; “This petition is filed in respect of the validity of the election conducted to the Nettoor Mahallu Muslim Jama-ath, Nettoor P.O., Ernakulam District. The reliefs sought by the petitioners are to declare that the general body meeting of the respondent Jama-ath held on ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-6-:** 19-04-2019 as illegal and to order for convening a fresh general body meeting as per the bye-law. The petitioner also prayed to conduct the election under the supervision and control of a Returning Officer appointed by the Board. However, in this matter it is informed by office that OP(Wakf)No.16/2019 filed by some other beneficiaries of the same respondent Jama-ath before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala, for the same reliefs was disposed by the Hon'ble High Court with an observation that there is no illegality in the election conducted for this year. In the said judgment dated 11-07-2019 the Hon'ble High Court also observed that the petitioners can approach the appropriate authority for making requisite changes in the bye-law to ensure proper maintenance of membership register and voters list in the future. Under these circumstances this OP is dismissed.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the order passed is legally unsustainable for myriad reasons. This Court had ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-7-:** occasion to consider a dispute relating to the same Nettoor Mahallu Muslim Jama-ath in O.P.(Wakf)No.16 of 2019 and disposed of the matter as per judgment dated 11.7.2019 (Ext.P5). After hearing both sides, the original petition was disposed in the following manner; “After hearing the learned counsel on both sides and on perusal of the records, we are of the view that the reliefs claimed in the petition cannot be granted as such because the election has happened despite the pandemonium occurred thereafter. Reliance is placed by the learned senior counsel on **Abdul Latheef C.K. and others v. Adv. K.M.Haneefa and others (2015 (3) KHC 844)** to contend that courts shall be loathe to interfere in the election process. Therefore, the petitioner's remedy is only to approach the appropriate authority for making requisite changes in the byelaw, if they feel so in order to ensure proper maintenance of membership register and voters list. As there is no illegality pointed out in publishing and conduct of election this year, we do not feel it proper to interfere in the ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** **==> picture [34 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** matter. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority, we dismiss the petition.” Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the Board is not justified in flouting the direction of this Court in Ext.P5 judgment and disposing of the matter as per Ext.P9 order. 5. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents submitted that nothing survives for consideration, in the light of Ext.P5 judgment. Learned Standing Counsel for the Board also supported the stand taken by the Chief Executive Officer of the Board. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any legal justification for passing Ext.P9 order. It is also the grievance of the petitioners that two interlocutory applications filed along with Ext.P6 ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-9-:** original petition were not even numbered. It is also alarming to note that Ext.P9 order was passed on the date of filing of Ext.P6 original petition itself. It appears that there is clear travesty of justice. In the result, this original petition is allowed. Ext.P9 order is set aside. The State Wakf Board is directed to consider Ext.P6 (O.P.No.108 of 2019) and the interlocutory applications filed therein, with due notice to all the parties, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of three months. The parties shall appear before the Wakf Board on **19.8.2019** , the date on which the Board is said to be sitting. The interlocutory applications filed along with the original petition shall be disposed of within a period of two weeks from the date of appearance of parties. ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** **:-10-:** All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- **A.HARIPRASAD JUDGE** Sd/- **SHIRCY V. JUDGE** ami/ ## **O.P.(Wakf) No.30 of 2019** ## **:-11-:** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE EXISTING BYE LAW OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT JAMA-ATH** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MASS PETITION DATED 13/4/2019 IS PREFERRED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE JAMA-ATH BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.4.2019 IN O.P(WAKF) 16/2019** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 22/4/2019 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11/7/2019 IN O.P(WAKF) 16/19 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT** **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF O.P.NO.108/2019 ON THE FILES OF KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, ERNAKULAM** **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF I.A. FOR THE DIRECTION TO CONTINUE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 AS THE MUTAVLLI** **EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. FOR THE DIRECTION NOT TO HANDOVER THE CHARGE AND BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF THE JAMA-ATH** **EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23/7/2019 IN O.P.NO.108/2019**