High Court of KeralaDivision BenchOriginal petition withdrawn/dismissed with libe...

OP(Wakf) No. 9 of 2019

Case / Petition Number:OP(Wakf) No. 9 of 2019

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. K. Abdul Rehim
  • R. Narayana Pisharadi
Judgment Date
2019-03-21
Court Decision / Holding
Permission is granted. Accordingly, the above original petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to file a revision petition under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act.
Final Disposition
Original petition withdrawn/dismissed with liberty to file revision under Section 83(9) Wakf Act.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • MUHAMMED HAMSATH
  • MOIDEEN HAJI K.C.
  • ABOOBACKER P.K.
  • ABDUL KABEER K.P.
  • MUHAMMED MUSHTHAFA K.P.
  • ABDUL SALAM P.K.
  • ASSAIN P.K.
  • SHIHABUDHEEN. O.K.
  • ABDUL SALAM P.P.
  • BASHEERUDHEEN C.K.
  • USMAN P.P.
  • MOYINKUTTI K.K.
  • ABDUL RAHIMAN P.K.
  • MOIDEEN C.V.
  • ABOOBACKER

Respondents

  • MOOSAMOULAVI.K.K.
  • IBRAHIM MASTER P.V.
  • ABDURAHIMAN K.V
  • SAIDALAVI K.K.
  • MUHAMMED M.K.
  • ABDURAHIMAN S/O. MUHAMMED
  • ABDURAHIMAN HAJI S/O. KUTTIRAYIN HAJI
  • AHAMMEDKUTTI K.
  • ABDUL AZEEZ
  • MUHAMMED
  • ABDUL SHUKKUR
  • ABDURAHIMAN S/O. MUHAMMED HAJA
  • ABDUL GAFOOR S/O. MUHAMMED
  • ABDULLMURINGATT S/O. MOIDEEN HAJI
  • SALEEM S/O. HUSSAIN
  • KAKKOVHIDAYATHULMUSLIMEENSANGAM
  • P.V. ALAVI MOULAVI PRESIDENT
  • K.T. ABDURAHIMAN SECRETARY
  • ADVOCATE SHIHABUDHEEN P.K.
  • KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Imam Grigorios Karat
  • • Bijith S. Khan
  • • N. Anand
  • • N. Krishna Prasad

Counsels for Respondents

  • • T.P. Sajid

Case Synopsis & Summary

This Kerala High Court matter arises as an original petition under Article 227 challenging an order/judgment in OS 86/2018 before the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode. The petition contends maintainability under Article 227 given the Wakf Act, specifically Section 83(9) and its proviso, which authorizes the High Court to call for records from the Tribunal for satisfying itself about the correctness of its determination. The court frames the issue as whether Article 227 relief can prevail where a statutory remedy under Wakf Act Section 83(9) exists and can be efficaciously invoked. It relies on Muhammed Ashraf K. v. Islamic Preaching Trust, Vazhakkad & another (2018(2) KHC 150(DB)) to hold that orders passed by the Tribunal on applications filed by one party and objected by another can be challenged in revision under the proviso to Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, thereby limiting Article 227 jurisdiction. It also cites K.K. Shrivastava et al. v. Bhupendra Kumar (AIR 1977 SC 1703) to support the proposition that procedurally the court should refrain from Article 227 when an efficacious statutory remedy exists. The petitioners seek withdrawal with liberty to file a revision under Section 83(9). The court grants permission, dismisses the petition as withdrawn, and directs filing of the revision petition; registry is to return copies for this purpose. The matter is heard by a Division Bench comprising C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 227 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 83(9) of Wakf Act, 1995Proviso to Section 83(9) of Wakf Act, 1995Wakf Act, 1995

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Doctrine of efficacious statutory remedy under Wakf Act, Section 83(9), precluding routine exercise of Article 227 jurisdiction when an efficacious remedy exists.
  • Proviso-based revision remedy under Section 83(9) Wakf Act as an efficacious alternative to challenge Tribunal orders.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contended that Article 227 of the Constitution governs the challenge to the Wakf Tribunal’s order; however, given a clear statutory remedy exists under Section 83(9) Wakf Act to revise Tribunal orders, the High Court should exercise caution or refrain from entertaining a petition under Article 227. They sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order by filing a revision under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, arguing the remedy is efficacious, expeditious, and appropriate, and aligns with statutory provisions.

Contentions of Respondents

The Wakf Board’s counsel and standing counsel argued that Article 227 should yield to the statutory remedy under Wakf Act; the appropriate remedy for challenging Tribunal orders is revision under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, as limited by the proviso. They relied on precedents emphasizing the necessity to avoid Article 227 when efficacious statutory remedies exist and to permit statutory revision processes to address disputes, citing Muhammed Ashraf K. v. Islamic Preaching Trust and K.K. Shrivastava v. Bhupendra Kumar.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Muhammed Ashraf K. v. Islamic Preaching Trust, Vazhakkad & another2018(2) KHC 150(DB)PositiveCited to support that orders of the Wakf Tribunal on applications under 83(9) can be challenged in revision under the proviso to Section 83(9), rendering Article 227 non-maintainable where an efficacious statutory remedy exists.
K.K. Shrivastava et al. v. Bhupendra KumarAIR 1977 SC 1703PositiveCited to justify refraining from Article 227 jurisdiction when an efficacious statutory remedy exists.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against OP(Wakf) No. 9 of 2019 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM &** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI THURSDAY ,THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019/ 30TH PHALGUNA, 1940** **OP (WAKF).No. 9 of 2019** **AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 86/2018 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE** **PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:** - **1 MUHAMMED HAMSATH, AGED 68 YEARS** **S/O. MUHAMMED MUSLIAR, CHIRAKKAL HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR , VIA RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM, 673 633, PIN CODE.** - **2 MOIDEEN HAJI K.C. AGED 76 YEARS** - **S/O. KHADIRIKOYA HAJI, PUKKUNNATH HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, VIA RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM-673 633, PIN CODE.** - **3 ABOOBACKER P.K. S/O. MUHAMMED HAJI, AGED 58 YEARS, VELUTHEDATH THODI HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, VIA RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM, 673 633, PIN CODE** - **4 ABDUL KABEER K.P. AGED 46 YEARS** - **S/O. ALIKOYA, POKKUNNATH HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, VIA RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM, 673 633, PIN CODE** - **5 MUHAMMED MUSHTHAFA K.P. AGED 40 YEARS** - **S/O. ALIKOYA, POKKUNNATH HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, VIA RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM, 673 633, PIN CODE.** - **6 ABDUL SALAM P.K. AGED 50 YRS, S/O. ABDULLA HAJI, KODAKKAD HOUSE, VAZHAYOOR POST, KOTTUPADAM, MALAPPURAM (DT).** -:2:- OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 - **7 ASSAIN P.K., AGED 65 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED, KUNDIYOTT HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM, POST VAZHAYUR, MALAPPURAM (DT).** - **8 SHIHABUDHEEN. O.K., AGED 40 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED, VELLATH HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, KOTTUPADAM , MALAPPURAM (DT).** - **9 ABDUL SALAM P.P., S/O. ALAVIMOULAVI, AGED 33 YRS, PILATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM,673 633, PIN CODE.** - **10 BASHEERUDHEEN C.K., AGED 43 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED, CHALITHODI HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM.** - **11 USMAN P.P., AGED 48 YEARS S/O. KUNHIMUHAMMED HAJI, PUTHUKULANGARA HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM.** - **12 MOYINKUTTI K.K., AGED 58 YEARS S/O. ALI, KODAKKATUKUZHI HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM.** - **13 ABDUL RAHIMAN P.K., S/O. MUHAMMED HAJI, AGED 51 YRS, VELUTHEDATH THODI HOUSE, KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM.** - **14 MOIDEEN C.V., AGED 58 YEARS S/O. ABOOBACKER, VALAPPIL HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM.** - **15 ABOOBACKER, AGED 63 YEARS S/O. MARAKKAR, MANNARAKKAL HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM, POST VAZHAYOOR, MALAPPURAM.** **BY ADVS. SRI.IMAM GRIGORIOS KARAT SRI.BIJITH S.KHAN SRI.N.ANAND SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD** -:3:- OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 ## **RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS:** - **1 MOOSAMOULAVI.K.K., S/O. MOYINKUTTY, AGED 70 YEARS, KODAKKATUKUZHI HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **2 IBRAHIM MASTER P.V.** - **S/O. VEERANKUTTY, AGED 63 YRS, PULAPRA HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DT-676 121** - **3 ABDURAHIMAN K.V S/O. ABOOBACKER, AGED 65 YEARS, KANDAMKULANGARA VADAKKE CHALIL HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST-676 121** - **4 SAIDALAVI K.K. S/O. MUHAMMDAJI, 60 YRS, KANDAMKULANGARA, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 121** - **5 MUHAMMED M.K. S/O. ABOOBACKER, AGED 60 YERS, PUNJIRALIL HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **6 ABDURAHIMAN S/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 63 YRS, CHAMMALIL HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST.-676 121** - **7 ABDURAHIMAN HAJI S/O. KUTTIRAYIN HAJI, AGED 63 YRS, PULIYARAKKAL HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **8 AHAMMEDKUTTI K. S/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 61 YRS, KONATH HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** -:4:- OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 - **9 ABDUL AZEEZ** - **S/O. AHAMMEDKUTTYI, AGED 47 YEARS, KOLLERITHODI HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **10 MUHAMMED** - **S/O. MAMMUTTY, AGED 55 YRS, KAMBURATH HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **11 ABDUL SHUKKUR, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMEDHIBATHULLA MUSLIYAR, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DT-676 121** - **12 ABDURAHIMAN S/O. MUHAMMED HAJA, AGED 62 YEARS, KARENGALNADUKKANDIYIL (H), VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **13 ABDUL GAFOOR S/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 52 YEARS, CHAKKAMBALAM (H), VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **14 ABDULLMURINGATT S/O. MOIDEEN HAJI, AGED 55 YEARS, MURINGATT HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **15 SALEEM S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED 43 YEARS, MANNARAKKAL HOUSE, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** - **16 KAKKOVHIDAYATHULMUSLIMEENSANGAM, REG. NO. 27/82, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)676 121** -:5:- OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 **17 P.V. ALAVI MOULAVI PRESIDENT, HIDAYATHULMUSLIMEENSANGAM, S/O. KUTTIRAYIN HAJI, PILATHOTTATHIL, VAZHAYURAMSOM, KAKKOVDESOM, POST VAZHAYUR, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM (DT)-676 121** **18 K.T. ABDURAHIMAN SECRETARY, HIDAYATHULMUSLIMEEN SANGAM, S/O. POKER ALI, KUNDUNGALVADAKKE CHALIL (H), KAKKOV, POST VAZHAYUR, MALAPPURAM DIST.-676 121** - **19 ADVOCATE SHIHABUDHEEN P.K. RETURNING OFFICER, KAKKOVHIDAYATHULMUSLIMEENSANGAM, POST VAZHAYUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 645.** - **20 KERALA STATE WAKAF BOARD CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, V.I.P. ROAD, KALOOR KOCHI-682 017** **BY ADV. SRI.T.P.SAJID, SC, KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SC,WAQF BOARD-SRI. T.P.SAJID, SRI.R.RAMDAS(CAVEATOR)** **THIS OP (WAKF) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:** -:6:- OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 ## **C.K. ABDUL REHIM & R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JJ.** **----------------------------------------------------OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 -------------------------------------------------------** _Dated this the 21[st] day of March, 2019_ ## **J U D G M E N T** ## _**Abdul Rehim, J.**_ A preliminary issue was raised with respect to maintainability of the original petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, in view of the specific provisions contained in Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995. 2. Heard; counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 16, as well as the Standing Counsel appearing for the Wakf Board. 3. The proviso to Section 83(9) explains that the High Court can call for and examine the records relating to any dispute, question or other matter which has been determined by the Tribunal, for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 -:7:- correctness, legality or propriety of such determination. It remains settled that, motion with respect to such examination can be made through an application by any of the parties. A Division Bench of this Court in _**Muhammed Ashraf K. v. Islamic Preaching Trust, Vazhakkad & another[2018(2) KHC 150(DB**_ ) held that, any order passed by the Tribunal on any application filed by one party and objected by other party can be challenged in revision under the proviso to Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act and in view of such an efficacious remedy provided under the statute, a petition under Article 227 is not maintainable. It is pointed out that, when there is an appropriate and efficacious statutory remedy is available, the court should keep its hands off in exercising the power vested under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In support of such a contention a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme court in _**K.K. Shrivastava etc. v. Bhupendra Kumar[AIR 1977 SC 1703]**_ is also cited. 4. Being confronted with the situation as mentioned OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 -:8:- above, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this court to withdraw the original petition with liberty reserved to file a revision petition against the order of the Wakf Tribunal, impugned herein. 5. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the above original petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioners to challenge the impugned order in revision to be filed before this court under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act. The Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned order produced, for the purpose of filing revision petition. **Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE** . ## **Sd/- R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JUDGE** . ul/- [True copy] P.S. to Judge. -:9:- OP(Wakf) No. 9 OF 2019 ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONERS'S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BYE-LAWS OF THE 16TH RESPONDENT SANGHAM DATED 12/2/1092** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 10.08.2018 ISSUED BY THE WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE IN O.A. NO. 03/2018** - **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF ELECTION NOTIFICATION DATED 29.09.2018 ISSUED BY THE 19TH RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO. 86 OF 2018 ON THE FILES OF THE WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE DATED 14.11.2018** - **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 1031 OF 2018 IN O.S. NO. 86 OF 2018 ON THE FILES OF THE WAKF TRIBUNAL KOZHIKODE.** - **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED 26.11.2018 FILED BY RESPONDENTS 1 TO 10, 12 TO 15 AND 18 TO I.A. NO. 1031 OF 2018 IN O.S. NO. 86/2018 BEFORE THE WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE.** - **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED 14.12.2018 PREFERRED BY THE 17TH RESPONDENT TO I.A. NO. 1031 OF 2018 IN O.S. NO. 86/2018 BEFORE THE WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE.** **EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29/12/2018 PASSED BY THE WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE IN I.A. NO. 1031 OF 2018 IN O.S. NO. 86/2018**