OP (Wakf) Nos. 14 of 2020 and 17 of 2020, Sakeer P.S. v. Puthur Pally Muslim Jama-ath, Election Commission, and Kerala State Wakf Board
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- S.V. Bhatti
- Bechu Kurian Thomas
- Judgment Date
- 2021-02-08
- Court Decision / Holding
- Original Petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Forum, including the Wakf Tribunal, for the reliefs available in accordance with law within three weeks from today.
- Final Disposition
- Dismissed (with liberty to approach Wakf Forum/Tribunal within three weeks)
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Sakeer P.S.
Respondents
- Puthur Pally Muslim Jama-ath (Changanassery), represented by its Treasurer Abdul Salam
- Election Commission
- Abdul Shukoor K.A., Member, Election Commission
- Muhammed Shaji A.S, Member, Election Commission
- Kerala State Wakf Board
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Shri. E. S. M. Kabeer
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sunil V. Mohammed
- • M. P. Madhavankutty
- • P. A. Abdul Jabbar
- • Muhammed Shaffi
- • Shahim Bin Aziz
- • T. K. Saidalikutty
Case Synopsis & Summary
These original petitions (OP(WAKF) Nos. 14/2020 and 17/2020) before the Kerala High Court arise from disputes within the Puthur Pally Muslim Jama-ath at Changanassery and the election processes overseen by the Election Commission. The petitioner, Sakeer P.S., seeks judicial intervention in two related proceedings: OP 14/2020 primarily seeking records (Exhibits P1–P9), disposal of Exhibit P2 appeal before the District Court, Kottayam, and a non-liability certificate after accepting Maulood rights; and OP 17/2020 seeking to nullify the election proposed for 27.12.2020 (Exhibit P1), to quash Exhibit P5 (alleged violation of a prior order, Exhibit P3), to declare respondents 2–4 not impartial, and to grant permission to contest disregarding Exhibit P5. Adv. E.S.M. Kabeer urged that obtaining complete relief from this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution was difficult and pressed for liberty to approach a Forum, including the Wakf Tribunal, for redressal of grievances. After considering the matter, the court observed that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 need not be exercised; however, acknowledging the alternative remedy, it dismissed the petitions with liberty to approach the Wakf Forum or other lawful remedies within three weeks. The order thereby declines direct relief in the High Court while enabling an avenue for relief through the Wakf Tribunal or other Forum.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
Advocate E S M Kabeer argued that relief from this Court under Article 227 is difficult to obtain; he urged liberty to approach a Forum, including the Wakf Tribunal, for redressal of the petitioner’s grievances. He referred to the records (Exhibits P1–P9) and prayed for disposal of Exhibit P2 before the District Court, Kottayam and for issuance of a non-liability certificate after accepting Mauloood rights, among other reliefs to meet justice.
Contentions of Respondents
The document does not set out explicit opposite submissions by the respondents; the court’s order records only the petitioner’s counsel’s argument and proceeds to dispose of the matter by denying supervisory relief while permitting recourse to a Forum under law.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2018(3) KLT 671 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P4 references a judgment reported as 2018(3) KLT 671; the body of the judgment does not discuss its principles, but it is listed as an exhibit. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against OP (Wakf) Nos. 14 of 2020 and 17 of 2020, Sakeer P.S. v. Puthur Pally Muslim Jama-ath, Election Commission, and Kerala State Wakf Board and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.