High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions

null

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024
Neutral Citation:null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Devan Ramachandran
Judgment Date
2024-03-15
Court Decision / Holding
In the circumstances, the Court disposes of WP(C) No. 4363 of 2024 with the following directions: (a) The respondent Bank is directed to immediately issue a request to the Investigation Authority/Police Authority and seek the amount which is required to be kept in freeze or held in lien in the account of the petitioner, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (b) If the Investigating Officer/Police Authority responds by specifying a particular amount, the freeze will be confined to that sum and the petitioner may transact beyond that limit. (c) If no information is received from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer within two months from the requisition, the petitioner will be allowed to transact fully in his account, subject to any future information. (d) As an alternative, if the response is that the entire account be frozen, the Bank will inform the petitioner and continue the freeze for a further period of eight months thereafter. (e) If, after eight months, the requisition is not withdrawn, the petitioner may approach this Court again; all contentions in the writ petition are reserved for future proceedings.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SARAFNIYAS N.K, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O UMER N.K, NARAMKUZHAI HOUSE, MUNDUMUZHI, VAZHAKKAD, MALAPURAM KERALA, PIN – 673640

Respondents

  • 1 UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME SECRETARY, PIN – 110001
  • 2 NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL, REPRESENTED BY ITS NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICER, NIGAM VIHAR, CHOTTA SHIMLA, SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADHESH SP-CYBERCR-HP@NIC.IN, PIN – 171002
  • 3 NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL REPRESENTED BY ITS NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICER, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING, CRIME INVESTIGATING DEPARTMENT, FIRST FLOOR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH ADGCID@AP.GOV.IN, PIN – 522503.
  • 4 INDIAN CYBERCRIME COORDINATION CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 5TH FLOOR, NDCC-II BUILDING, JAI SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110001
  • 5 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, HIMACHAL PRADESH SECRETARIAT, SHIMLA, CS-HP@NIC.IN, PIN – 171002
  • 6 STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, 1ST BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, INTERIM GOVERNMENT COMPLEX, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI CS@AP.GOV.IN, PIN – 522503
  • 7 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NIGAM VIHAR, CHOTTA SHIMLA, SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADHESH DGP-HP@NIC.IN, PIN – 171002
  • 8 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MANAGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH DGP@APPOLICE.GOV.IN, PIN – 522502
  • 9 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME PS DHARAMSHALA, KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH PSCYBER-NR@HP.GOV.IN, PIN – 176215
  • 10 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION BUCHUPALLY, THONDUR PS, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH THONDURUPS@GMAIL.COM, PIN – 516404
  • 11 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, TIRUCHANOOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN – 517503
  • 12 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, RBI, BAKERY JUNCTION, NANDAVANAM, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695033
  • 13 FEDERAL BANK EDAVANNAPPARA (FDRL0001600) CITY GATE EDAVANNAPPARA, VAZHAKKAD, CHERUVAYOOR, OPPOSITE PRIVATE BUS STAND, KERALA REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PIN – 673645

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • N.J.ASHWIN
  • • SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SC
  • • SRI.PAULOCHAN ANTONY, SC
  • • S.MANU, DSGI

Counsels for Respondents

  • • null

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition concerns the freezing of a bank account in the context of cybercrime investigations. The Kerala High Court relies on its earlier decision in Dr. Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India (2024 (1) KLT 826) and reiterates that a blanket, indefinite debit freeze without a specified period or amount is deleterious to both the account holder and the banking system. In the present case, the Banks have received police requisitions that do not specify any particular amount and seek a complete, blanket debit freeze of all funds in the petitioner’s account. The court notes that such blanket freezes infringe the right to livelihood and the general facilitation of banking transactions in a modern economy. It directs a measured approach consistent with Dr. Sajeer: the Investigation Authority should quantify the amount to be kept frozen, if any. (a) The bank must request the Police to specify the amount within one month. (b) If a definite amount is identified, the freeze will be limited to that sum, allowing the petitioner to transact beyond it. (c) If no information is received within two months, the petitioner may transact fully, subject to future information. (d) If the entire account is to be frozen, the bank will inform the petitioner and continue the freeze for eight months, and (e) after eight months, the petitioner may approach the Court again if the requisition is not withdrawn. This judgment balances investigative needs with protection of liberties and reserves further contentions for the future.

Provisions of Law Cited

null

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • null

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Not explicitly provided in the document.

Contentions of Respondents

Not explicitly provided in the document.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Dr. Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India2024 (1) KLT 826PositiveThe judgment explicitly relies on Dr. Sajeer(supra) to condemn blanket, indefinite freezing of accounts and to outline the time-bound and amount-bound directions; the ruling follows the precedent rather than overrules it.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against null and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

``` IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ``` ## `PRESENT` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 15[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024` ## `PETITIONER:` ``` SARAFNIYAS N.K, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O UMER N.K, NARAMKUZHAI HOUSE, MUNDUMUZHI, VAZHAKKAD, MALAPURAM KERALA, PIN – 673640. ``` ``` BY ADVS. T.S.SARATH MANU RAMACHANDRAN M.KIRANLAL R.RAJESH (VARKALA) SAMEER M NAIR JOTHISHA K.A. SAILAKSHMI MENON AASHI K. SHAJAN BINU R. ``` ## `RESPONDENTS:` ``` 1UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME SECRETARY, PIN – 110001. ``` ``` 2NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL REPRESENTED BY ITS NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICER, NIGAM VIHAR, CHOTTA SHIMLA, SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADHESH SP-CYBERCR-HP@NIC.IN, PIN – 171002 ``` ``` 3NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL REPRESENTED BY ITS NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICER, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING, CRIME INVESTIGATING DEPARTMENT, FIRST FLOOR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT ANDRA PRADESH ADGCID@AP.GOV.IN, PIN – 522503. ``` - `4 INDIAN CYBERCRIME COORDINATION CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 5TH FLOOR, NDCC-II BUILDING, JAI SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110001` ``` WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024 ``` ``` -2- ``` - `5 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, HIMACHAL PRADESH SECRETARIAT, SHIMLA, CS-HP@NIC.IN, PIN – 171002` - `6 STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, 1ST BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, INTERIM GOVERNMENT COMPLEX, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI CS@AP.GOV.IN, PIN – 522503` - `7 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NIGAM VIHAR, CHOTTA SHIMLA, SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADHESH DGP-HP@NIC.IN, PIN – 171002` - `8 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MANAGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADHESH DGP@APPOLICE.GOV.IN, PIN – 522502` - `9 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME PS DHARAMSHALA, KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH PSCYBER-NR@HP.GOV.IN, PIN – 176215` - `10 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION BUCHUPALLY, THONDUR PS, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH THONDURUPS@GMAIL.COM, PIN – 516404` - `11 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, TIRUCHANOOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN – 517503` - `12 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, RBI, BAKERY JUNCTION, NANDAVANAM, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695033` - `13 FEDERAL BANK EDAVANNAPPARA (FDRL0001600) CITY GATE` ``` WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024 ``` ``` -3- ``` ``` EDAVANNAPPARA, VAZHAKKAD, CHERUVAYOOR, OPPOSITE PRIVATE BUS STAND, KERALA REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PIN – 673645 ``` ``` BY ADV S. N.J.ASHWIN SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SC SRI.PAULOCHAN ANTONY, SC S.MANU, DSGI ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024 ``` ``` -4- ``` ## `JUDGMENT` ``` In matters relating to the freezing of accounts, this Court has already delivered a judgment inDr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of ``` ``` India [2024 (1) KLT 826]. ``` ``` 2.In the aforesaid judgment, certain ``` ``` directions were issued to the respective ``` ``` Banks, as also the Police Authorities, to ``` ``` continue the freeze for a certain period of ``` ``` time and only to the extent which was ``` ``` requisitioned by the Police. ``` ``` 3.However, what makes this case ``` ``` different from the one that was considered by ``` ``` this Court in the aforesaid judgment, is that ``` ``` the requisitions received by the Banks are ``` ``` stated to contain no particular amount, but seek a complete and blanket debit freeze of ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024` ``` -5- ``` ``` all the amounts in credit therein. ``` ``` 4.The legal issues and the imperatives involved have already been discussed by this Court in Dr.Sajeer(supra). A blanket freeze indefinitely, and without any period of time being stipulated by the Police, is certainly deleterious, not only to the account holders but also to the system as a whole; and the view in this regard of this Court is clearly reflected in Dr.Sajeer (supra). ``` ``` 5.However, since the Banks are now ``` ``` incapacitated from allowing the operation of the accounts of the petitioner because the ``` ``` requisition issued to them do not contain any particular amount, I am certain that this ``` ``` Court is enjoined to deal with this matter, sufficientlyprotectingboththe ``` ``` investigation, as also the account holders. I ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024` ``` -6- ``` ``` am persuaded to such course because, the blanket freeze of an account, if it is not imperatively necessary, will be an affront to ``` ``` the rights of the account holders and ``` ``` impinges even their right to livelihood, ``` ``` since, in this era, everyone relies upon ``` ``` banking transactions as the primary source. ``` ``` In the afore circumstances, following ``` ``` Dr.Sajeer(supra), I dispose of this writ ``` ``` petition with the following directions: ``` ``` (a) The respondent Bank is directed to ``` ``` immediately issue a request to the Investigation Authority/Police Authority and ``` ``` seek the amount which is required to be kept ``` ``` in freeze or held in lien in the account of the petitioner. This shall be done by the Bank within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024` ``` -7- ``` ``` (b) In the event that the Investigating Officer/Police Authority responds to the afore requisition and mentions a particular amount, as being the sum that is required to be kept frozen or held in lien, then the ``` ``` respondent Bank will confine the freeze/lien ``` ``` to such an extent and allow the petitioner/account holder to deal with his account and transact therein beyond that limit. ``` ``` (c) On the contrary, if no information is ``` ``` receivedfromthePolice ``` ``` Authority/Investigating officer within a ``` ``` period of two months from the date on which the afore requisition was made by the respondent Bank, then they will allow the petitioner/account holder to transact fully in his account, notwithstanding the debit ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024` ``` -8- ``` ``` freeze requisition, subject to any further ``` ``` information to be received from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer in future. ``` - `(d) As an alternative, if the response` ``` from the Police Authority/Investigating ``` ``` Officer is that the entire account be frozen for any reason that is mentioned therein, thentheBankwillinformthe ``` ``` petitioner/account holder accordingly and ``` ``` continue the freeze in such a manner for a ``` ``` further period of eight months thereafter. ``` ``` (e)If, after a period of eight months, ``` ``` the requisition made by the Police ``` ``` Authorities - either to a particular sum or ``` ``` the full amount in the account of the account holder - is not withdrawn, then the ``` ``` petitioner/account holder will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; for ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024 ``` ``` -9- which purpose, all contentions in this writ petition are reserved to him to be impelled in future. ``` ``` Sd/- ``` ``` DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE ``` ``` akv ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 4363 OF 2024 ``` ``` -10- ``` ## `APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4363/2024` ## `PETITIONER EXHIBITS` ``` EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DETAILS DATED 07.07.2023 RECEIVED FROM THE 9TH RESPONDENT ``` ``` EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DETAILS RECEIVED FROM THE 10TH RESPONDENT DATED 30.05.2023 ``` ``` EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DETAILS RECEIVED FROM THE 11TH RESPONDENT DATED 15.07.2023 ```