Nidhin Soman P. and others v. State of Kerala and others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Alexander Thomas
- A. Badharudeen
- Judgment Date
- 2021-08-10
- Court Decision / Holding
- With liberty as stated, the above Original Petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is accorded to the petitioners to pursue remedies as known in law, including seeking impleadment in related petitions as described.
- Final Disposition
- Original Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- NIDHIN SOMAN P., aged 31 years S/O.SOMAN P.N, PAMPARA HOUSE, MARAKKADAVU P.O, PULPALLY, WAYANAD 673 579
- SANILA M.I aged 29 years D/O.SAFIYA, MULLATH HOUSE, NELLARACHAL P.O, AMBALAVAYAL, WAYANAD 673 593
- MARIYA JACOB AGED 30 YEARS D/O.JACOB, PAYYAMPALLY P.O, MUTTANKARA, WAYANAD 670 646
Respondents
- STATE OF KERALA represented by its Secretary to Government, General Education Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram 695001
- KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION represented by its Secretary, PSC Office, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram 695001
- THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695014
- THE SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001
- SMITHA K.G, aged 32 years W/O. SAJESH KUMAR A.V, KOKKOTTU, CHALAKKODU P.O, PAYYANNUR KANNUR 670 307
- SAJNA C.K AGED 29 YEARS D/O. ABOOBACKER C.K, CHAKKIKULATHIL HOUSE, MANNARMALA, PACHERI, MALAPPURAM 679 325
- ASHA E AGED 29 YEARS W/O. MOHANDAS, KONNIKKAL HOUSE, MANGODE P.O, CHERUPULASSERY, PALAKKAD 679 503
- SHAHANA T AGED 26 YEARS D/O. ABDURAHMAN, THARAYIL HOUSE, PARUVAMANNA, PAZHAMALLOOR P.O, MALAPPURAM 676 506
- SHAHNA UMMER AGED 29 YEARS W/O. MUHAMMED SHAMEEM, THENGUMTHODY HOUSE, KOOTTILANGADY, MALAPPURAM 673 506
- HASEENA P.K AGED 36 YEARS D/O. ABDU M, CHELAPPURAM HOUSE, KAVANUR, MALAPPURAM 676 121
- SWETLANA S.K.P AGED 28 YEARS D/O. SIVAKUMAR P, PUTTANIKAT HOUSE, ARUKIZHAYA, MANJERI, MALAPPUIRAM 676 121
- SHARAFALI A AGED 27 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED ARINCHEERIMMAL, ARINCHEERIMMAL HOUSE, KIZHUPARAMBA MALAPPURAM 673 639
- NASEEF JAMAL P.S AGED 30 YEARS D/O. ABDUL LATHEEF P.S, PUKKALASSERY, TANALUR P.O, MALAPPURAM 676 307
- ANJU KRISHNA AGED 27 YEARS D/O. KRISHNA PRABHA C.M, KRISHNA, THEKKUMMURI, KARALMANNA, PALAKKAD 679 506
- AMBILY K.N AGED 33 YEARS D/O. P.NARAYANAN, SREE BHAVAN, KARAKUNNU, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM 676 123
- JASNA V.P AGED 30 YEARS D/O. HASSAN V.P, VATTAPPARAMBIL, KARUVAMBRAM, CHETTIYANGADI, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM 676 123
- JANISHA K.U AGED 29 YEARS D/O. UNNEN K, THAZATHE KALLADI HOUSE, PULLISSERI, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD 678 583
- ANEES P AGED 38 YEARS S/O. ALIKUTTY P, POTHENCODE HOUSE, THRIPANACHI, MALAPPURAM 673 641
- JOSHMA XAVIER AGED 36 YEARS D/O. XAVIER D, POTTAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, THARISH P.O, KARUVARAKUNDU, MALAPPURAM 676 525
- RAHEESATH K.V AGED 31 YEARS D/O. MUSTHAFFA K.V, KIZHAKKUMARAMBAN HOUSE, ARIMANAL, KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM 676 525
- SHABANA P.T AGED 32 YEARS D/O. ABDUL SALAM P.T, ERAKKODAN HOUSE, KODIYATHOOR P.O, MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE 673 602
- PRIYA NADUTHODI AGED 30 YEARS D/O. UNNIKRISHNAN, KARIYATTIL HOUSE, EDAPPALAM P.O, PALAKKAD 679 308
- HARSHA H AGED 27 YEARS D/O. HARIDASAN, KORANKULANGARA HOUSE, VELAM P.O, KUTTIYADI, KOZHIKODE 673 508
- ABHINESH M.S AGED 35 YEARS S/O MUNDA V.P, KOTTIKUNNATH HOUSE, KALADY, MALAPPURAM 679 582
- SUBHA A AGED 36 YEARS D/O. UNNIKRISHNAN, MOHAN NIVAS, ANAKKARA P.O, PALAKKAD 679 551
- FAZEELA P.P D/O. ALI P.P, ORVAKOTTIL HOUSE, KOZHIKOTTIRI, PARAKKAD, PALAKKAD 679 303
- RAJITHA A.P AGED 28 YEARS D/O. ANGATHIPADY, KARATHUR, CODAKKAL P.O, MALAPPURAM
- SHAJINA K AGED 27 YEARS D/O. NARAYANAN V, VAZHAYIL HOUSE, ANNUR P.O, VIA PAYYANNUR KANNUR P.O, VIA PAYYANNUR KANNUR 670 307
- SMISHA M.S W/O. RAJU, MMTHANDASSERY HOUSE, PADOOR P.O, THRISSUR 680 524
- SHAHNA C.K D/O. ABDU RAHMAN C.K, VALIYAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, IRUMBUZHI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
- FATHIMATHU SAMEENA K.M D/O. SAINUDHEEN K.M MEACHEERI HOUSE, MUNDAKKAL, MALAPPURAM 673 645
- ANUSHA N D/O. VIJAYAN N, AKKARATHODI HOUSE, VALIYAPARAMBA P.O, PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM 673 637
- SAJILAMOL M.T D/O. KEERANKUTTY P.K, SIVADAM HOUSE, VALASSERI, KIZHISSERI, KUZHIMANA, MALAPPURAM 673 641
- SUFAIRATH A.P D/O. ISMAIL A P, CHOLOTH HOUSE, VELLARAMKUNNU, CHUNGATHARA, MALAPPURAM 679 335
- AMBILY K NAIR D/O. KRISHNAKUMAR R, THAZHATHEDATH HOUSE, MARAYOOR P.O, IDUKKI
- NAZIRA SATHAR AGED 34 YEARS D/O. ABDUL SATHAR, JANNATH E NAZAR, NEAR IPC FAITH HOME, KARINGALLATHANI, PARAPPANAGADI, MALAPPURAM 676 306
- FATHIMATHU SAFANA K.P NOOR MANZIL, PANACHIKAPALLIYALI, OLAVATOOR P.O, MALAPPURAM 673 638
- PRAKASHAN G AGED 41 YEARS S/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN V, PRIYA NIVAS, AYYAPPANKAVU, KANNADI P.O, PALAKKAD 678 701
- LAKSHMI PRIYA S AGED 38 YEARS W/O. SHIJU C.B, LAKSHMI NIVAS, SANTHI PURAM, KODUVAYUR P.O, PALAKKAD 678 501
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • K.P. Pradeep
- • T.T. BijU
- • T. Thasmi
- • M.J. Anoopa
- • RASMI NAIR
- • T.
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri Saigi Jacob Palatti, Sr. Govt. Pleader
- • Sri P.C. Sasidharan, SC, KPSC
Case Synopsis & Summary
OP(KAT) No.162 of 2021 before the Kerala High Court arises from an order of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal (OA EKM 917/2019) challenging the OA's directions. The petitioners, Nidhin Soman P., Sanila M.I., and Mariya Jacob, three third parties in the OA, seek leave to withdraw the Original Petition and urge liberty to file applications to be impleaded as additional respondents in similar OPs filed by the Kerala Public Service Commission, in order to support PSC in those petitions. Their counsel submits that, as third parties in the OA before the Tribunal, they should be allowed to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Rule 152 of the Kerala High Court Rules to be impleaded as respondents in related petitions. The court notes a Full Bench decision in Haris v. Jahfar (2021 (4) KLT 155 (FB)) which envisages such a remedy. With liberty to pursue remedies in law, the court dismisses the O.P. as withdrawn, leaving open the possibility of impleadment in other petitions under appropriate procedure. The judgment thus records an orderly end to this petition and signals potential further proceedings, if the petitioners pursue the impleadment route in adjacent Original Petitions.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Third party in OA before the Tribunal can approach the High Court under Article 226 to seek impleadment as an additional respondent (as envisaged by Haris v. Jahfar, 2021 (4) KLT 155 (FB))
- Liberty to withdraw Original Petition and pursue remedies as known in law
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners submitted that they are third parties in the OA before the Tribunal and seek leave to withdraw the Original Petition and urge liberty to file applications to be impleaded as additional respondents in similar OPs filed by the Kerala Public Service Commission, in order to support PSC in those petitions. Their counsel submits that, as third parties in the OA before the Tribunal, they should be allowed to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Rule 152 of the Kerala High Court Rules to be impleaded as respondents in related petitions. The court notes a Full Bench decision in Haris v. Jahfar (2021 (4) KLT 155 (FB)) which envisages such a remedy. With liberty to pursue remedies in law, the court dismisses the O.P. as withdrawn, leaving open the possibility of impleadment in other petitions under appropriate procedure. The judgment thus records an orderly end to this petition and signals potential further proceedings, if the petitioners pursue the impleadment route in adjacent Original Petitions.
Contentions of Respondents
Not stated in the document.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haris v. Jahfar | 2021 (4) KLT 155 (FB) | Positive | Full Bench decision relied upon to justify that a third party in OA can approach the High Court under Article 226 to seek impleadment as an additional respondent. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Nidhin Soman P. and others v. State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.