NGT BAR ASSOCIATION (WESTERN ZONE) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- Dipak Misra
- A. M. Khanwilkar
- D. Y. Chandrachud
- Judgment Date
- 2018-03-27
- Court Decision / Holding
- Justice Jawad Rahim shall discharge the duties of Chairperson for all purposes, including participating in the selection process for filling up vacancies of members, until a regular appointment of a new Chairperson is made. This interim arrangement is to be purely temporary and shall not be construed as a final determination of the seniority inter se between Justice Jawad Rahim and Justice RS Rathore.
- Final Disposition
- Directions issued.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- NGT Bar Association (Western Zone)
Respondents
- Union of India
- Ors
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Dhruv Mehta
- • Ninad Laud
- • Kush Chaturvedi
- • Aman Varma
- • Anjuman Tripathi
- • Ivo D’ Costa
- • Ms. Priyashree PH
- • Aditaya Swain
Counsels for Respondents
- • K. K. Venugopal
- • Ajit Kumar Sinha
- • Seema Bengani
- • Ritesh Kumar
- • Gurmeet Singh Makker
Case Synopsis & Summary
This is a Supreme Court order concerning interim arrangements for the leadership of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) after the term of the Chairperson ended. The Court interprets Section 11 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 to permit the Central Government to notify a judicial member to act as Chairperson until a new Chairperson is appointed, so that the tribunal can function and the process of filling vacancies can proceed. The Attorney General placed on record a comparative chart showing the seniority of the two senior judicial members, Justice Jawad Rahim and Justice Raghuvendra S Rathore, noting that Rahim was senior on appointment to the NGT. The Court observes that the Central Government intends to abide by the interim arrangement made by this Court and that such a measure is necessary to enable the acting Chairperson to participate in the appointment process for vacant posts. By an office order dated 15 March 2016, seniority inter se among judicial and expert members had been delineated. The Court directs that the notification under Section 11 be issued in terms of that seniority. The interim arrangement is to continue until a regular appointment is made and is not a final determination of seniority between Rahim and Rathore.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The extract does not provide a detailed enumerated argument section by the petitioners. The Court’s order records the statutory framework under Section 11 of the NGT Act and directs an interim Chairperson in accordance with the seniority order, indicating the petitioners’ interest in continuity of tribunal leadership and orderly appointment processes.
Contentions of Respondents
The Respondents’ position, as reflected in the record, is represented by the Attorney General who places on record a comparative chart of the senior judicial members (Justice Jawad Rahim and Justice RS Rathore) and submits that the Central Government will abide by the interim arrangement proposed by this Court. The content underscores the relevance of the seniority in determining who acts as Chairperson during the interim period and that the seniority delineated by the 15 March 2016 office order should govern the notification under Section 11.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against NGT BAR ASSOCIATION (WESTERN ZONE) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.