High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed of by mutual consent; divorce granted;...

Neethu Thomas v. Jibin K. Jaison

Case / Petition Number:O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
  • P. G. Ajithkumar
Judgment Date
2022-09-01
Court Decision / Holding
The court allowed the joint petition for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, with effect from today. It waived the statutory six-month cooling period in light of Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur and directed custody of the child as per the terms in the petition, with maintenance payable by the respondent as specified. It also held that all claims have been settled and that no further claims shall be raised. The matter is disposed accordingly.
Final Disposition
Disposed of by mutual consent; divorce granted; custody and maintenance as per terms; statutory cooling-off period waived; final disposition of the petition.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Neethu Thomas

Respondents

  • Jibin K. Jaison

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • M.S. Amal Dharsan Thushara James
  • • Advocate for Neethu Thomas (as listed)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Adithya Rajeev

Case Synopsis & Summary

This High Court of Kerala matter concerns an Original Petition (Family Court) filed for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869. The petition, originally under Article 227 of the Constitution, was heard after directions by this Court. On 01.09.2022, the parties filed a joint petition with an agreed settlement covering mutual divorce, child custody, visitation rights, and maintenance, with a full waiver of all further claims. The terms provide that the wife (Neethu Thomas) shall have absolute custody of the child, with a structured visitation schedule for the husband (Jibin K. Jaison) at specific ages: limited visits for early years, then weekend custody for later years, and equal sharing during school vacations. The husband agrees to pay staged child maintenance (Rs. 3,000 from ages 2–5, Rs. 5,000 from 6–10, Rs. 10,000 from 11–15, and Rs. 12,000 from 16–18), and to bear some portion of wedding expenses; the wife waives alimony. The petition contends that all prior monetary claims are settled, and no further claims will be raised. The Court relies on Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur to waive the statutory six‑month cooling period, finds the marriage irretrievably broken, and grants the divorce by mutual consent with custody and maintenance as agreed. The judgment is by Justices Anil K. Narendran and P. G. Ajithkumar.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 227 of the Constitution of IndiaDivorce Act, 1869Section 10ASection 13B(2)Section 13B(1)Order XXXIIA Rule 3 CPCSection 23(2) of the Divorce ActFamily Courts Act, 1984Section 9 of the Family Courts Act

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • Discretion to waive the waiting period under Section 10A as per Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners sought dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, highlighting a comprehensive settlement of all claims. They filed a joint petition with affidavits confirming consent and willingness to adhere to terms on custody, visitation, and maintenance of the child. The arrangement assigns absolute custody to the wife, with a structured visitation regime for the husband and shared custody during vacations. The maintenance schedule for the child is staged by age, with a default provision that arrears would suspend the husband’s custody/visitation. They assert there are no pending disputes or alimony claims, and all assets and ornaments have been settled between the parties. They request the court to dissolve the marriage with effect from today, waive the statutory six-month cooling period, and endorse the out-of-court settlement as final.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent supported the mutual consent petition, consenting to the terms for divorce under Section 10A and the stated custody and maintenance arrangement. Counsel affirmed that all claims have been settled and that there is no likelihood of reconciliation. They emphasized compliance with the joint settlement, including the custody schedule and financial contributions for the child and wedding expenses. The respondent’s stance was that dissolution by mutual consent is appropriate given the circumstances and the parties’ genuine settlement of differences.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur2017 (8) SCC 746PositiveCited to justify waiving the six-month cooling period under Section 10A; the decision outlines criteria for such waiver and supports mutual consent dissolution when settled and irretrievably broken.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Neethu Thomas v. Jibin K. Jaison and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** ## **&** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR** **THURSDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 10 TH BHADRA, 1944 O.P.(FC) NO. 506 OF 2022** **O.P.(G&W) No.111 OF 2022 OF THE FAMILY COURT,KOZHIKODE PETITIONER:** **NEEETHU THOMAS AGED 28 YEARS, D/O LATE THOMAS, CHELLANTHARAYIL HOUSE, CHAMAL P.0, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673573.** **BY ADVS. M.S.AMAL DHARSAN THUSHARA JAMES** ## **RESPONDENT:** **JIBIN K.JAISON, KALLOLIKKAL, KAKKADU P.O, PUTHUPADI, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673586.** **BY ADV ADITHYA RAJEEV** **THIS O.P.(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL HEARING ON 01.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** 2 O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 ## **JUDGMENT** ## Ajithkumar, J. The petitioner-wife, who is the respondent in O.P.No.111 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court, Kozhikode, has filed this Original Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash the said O.P. or to direct the Family Court to dispose of the same within a time fixed by this Court. 2. On 31.08.2022, this Court directed the parties to appear before this Court on 01.09.2022. 3. When the matter is taken up today, parties have filed a petition under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869 as I.A.No.1 of 2022 for divorce by mutual consent. The conditions agreed to between the parties regarding the dissolution of marriage on mutual consent and about the custody as well as maintenance of the child are the following: “7. However, all claims between the parties are settled out of court including claim for past and future maintenance and arrangement for the custody of the child, no further claim remains to be settled. The 1[st] petitioner has returned from her custody, all the gold ornaments belonging to the 2[nd] petitioner, and the 2[nd] Petitioner has returned from his custody all gold ornaments belonging to the 1st Petitioner while filing 3 O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 this petition. Accordingly, the Petitioners are now filing this Joint Petition for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent on the following terms and conditions viz: (i) Both the Petitioners shall cooperate in full measure to take this Joint Petition for divorce by mutual consent forward to its logical and successful end so as to get their marriage dissolved. The Petitioners herein (ii) Visitation and Custody of the Child unanimously agrees that the 1[st] Petitioner shall have the absolute custody of the child except on conditions mentioned hereunder: a) From age 2 to 5.- The 2[nd] Petitioner hereby agrees that he shall have only the visitation right of the child on every Saturday of a month till the child attains 5 years of age. He shall visit the child at the residence of the 1[st] Petitioner and spend time with the child from 9am till 6pm on that day and thereafter return back the child to the custody of the 1[st] Petitioner. b) From age 6 to 18 - The Petitioners herein agrees that 2[nd] Petitioner shall have the right to custody of the child on every Saturday of the month from 6[th] year of the child till she attains 18 years of age. He shall take the custody of the child from the school on every Friday (after school hours) and thereafter return back the custody of the child to the 1[st] Petitioner on Sunday morning at 10 am. 4 O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 c) The 2[nd] Petitioner shall take the custody of the child on any further days with the consent of the 1st Petitioner. d) The 1[st] Petitioner agrees that she shall continue to live in the present locality and in the event she shifts to different locality, she shall make available the child on the above agreed days for the custody of the child to the 2[nd] Petitioner. e) The Petitioners unanimously agree that the Custody of the child during school vacations viz. Onam vacation, Christmas vacation and Summer vacation shall be equally shared between the Petitioners. Thereby the 2[nd] Petitioner shall have the custody of the child for half of the holidays and the custody shall be returned to the 2[nd] Petitioner after the same. f) The Petitioners unanimously agree to join hands in the future endeavors of the child and shall co-operate with each other on all major events of the child. (iii) Maintenance of child - The 1[st] Petitioner agrees to waive the right to maintenance from the 2[nd] Petitioner. The 2[nd] Petitioner agrees to pay monthly maintenance towards the child in the following proportion on or before 10[th] day of every English calendar month: a) From age 2 to 5- An amount of Rs.3,000/- every month b) From age 6 to 10 - An amount of Rs.5,000/- every month 5 O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 c) From age 11 to 15 - An amount of Rs.10,000/- every month d) From age 16 to 18 - An amount of Rs. 12,000/every month. The above amounts shall be timely remitted in the account of Smt. Neethu Thomas, A/c. No. 67213521210, State Bank of India, Thamarassery Branch (IFSN Code: SBIN0070225) of the 1[st] Petitioner and same shall be used for the welfare of the child. The 2[nd] Petitioner shall also bear half of the wedding expenses of the child at the time of marriage. The 2[nd] Petitioner further agrees that in the event of any default on the payment of maintenance as agreed above, the custody and visitation right of the 2[nd] Petitioner shall be ceased till the payment of arrears of maintenance. (iv) There are no other monetary claims between the Petitioners remaining be satisfied other than those mentioned above. The Petitioners, having settled all their claims, and with nothing remaining due from one another, shall not hereafter raise any fresh claim against each other. (v) In the light of the settlement made between the Petitioners, neither the First Petitioner nor the Second Petitioner shall claim any compensation/ alimony/ past or present maintenance.” 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and ascertaind the veracity of the consent of both 6 ## O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 sides. Both parties filed independent affidavits expressing their willingness to abide by the terms and conditions in the petition. 5. The Apex Court in **Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur [2017 (8) SCC 746]** considered whether it is mandatory in all cases to wait for the statutory period under Section 13B(2) of the Act before allowing divorce on mutual consent. It was held that the provision was discretionary and not mandatory. The Apex Court held that the period can be waived if the Court is satisfied after considering the following: “i) the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13B(2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13B(1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself; ii) all efforts for mediation/conciliation including efforts in terms of Order XXXIIA Rule 3 CPC/Section 23(2) of the Act/Section 9 of the Family Courts Act to reunite the parties have failed and there is no likelihood of success in that direction by any further efforts; iii) the parties have genuinely settled their differences including alimony, custody of child or any other pending issues between the parties; iv) the waiting period will only prolong their agony.” 7 O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 6. We are convinced that the petitioner and respondent voluntarily had decided to part with. It is seen that their marriage is irretrievably broken down and all efforts for reconciliation failed. Taking all the facts and circumstances stated above, and law laid down by the Apex Court in **Amardeep Singh** (supra), we waive the statutory cooling period of six months and allow the I.A.No. 1 of 2022 and dispose of this Original Petition as follows: - (i) Marriage between the petitioner and the respondent solemnised on 30.08.2018 is dissolved under Section 10A of the Divorce Act. 1869 with effect from today. - (ii) Custody of the child shall be as per the terms and conditions extracted above in paragraph no.3. Sd/- ## **ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE** **Sd/-** ## **P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE** dkr 8 O.P.(FC) No.506 of 2022 ## **APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 506/2022** |**PETITIONER**|**EXHIBITS**| |---|---| |**Exhibit P1**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION IN**| ||**M.C NO. 176/2021 FILED BEFORE THE**| ||**FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE**| |**Exhibit P2**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION**| ||**O.P. NO.111/2022 BEFORE THE FAMILY**| ||**COURT, KOZHIKODE**| |**Exhibit P3**|**TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED AS**| ||**I.A. NO. 2/2022 IN O.P. NO.111/2022**|