High CourtDivision BenchMatters disposed of.

Naveen Kaushik v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case / Petition Number:Criminal Appeal No. 1393 of 2013
Neutral Citation:[2018] 2 SCR 1108

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Adarsh Kumar Goel
  • R. F. Nariman
Judgment Date
2018-04-26
Court Decision / Holding
The appeals and the special leave petition are allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law. The Court remands Criminal Appeal No. 1394/2013 to the High Court for fresh decision in light of the ARRA judgment; other connected appeals/SLPs are disposed of or withdrawn with directions to appear before the trial court on specified dates. The SLPs detagged or re-tagged as noted; the record is to be transmitted to the trial court for appropriate proceedings.
Final Disposition
Matters disposed of.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Naveen Kaushik

Respondents

  • Central Bureau of Investigation

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Md. Shahid Anwar
  • • Zulfiquar Ali Khan
  • • Aamir Naseem
  • • M.C. Dhingra
  • • Anuj Chauhan
  • • Sibo Sankar Mishra
  • • M.K. Pandey
  • • Ms. Sutapa Sarangi
  • • Anupam Lal Das
  • • Anirudh Singh
  • • Krishanu Barua
  • • Rishi Malhotra
  • • Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta
  • • Ajit Kumar Gupta
  • • Ms. G Radhey Shyam Ahuja
  • • Arvind Kumar Shukla
  • • Mohit D. Ram
  • • Alok Shukla
  • • Nihal Ahmad
  • • Kunal Yadav
  • • Ms. Nena Shukla
  • • Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj
  • • Yoginder Handoo
  • • Nishant Kumar
  • • Harvinder Singh Bhullar
  • • Ms. Monalisha Chowdhury
  • • Ashwani Kumar
  • • Yogesh Verma
  • • Bhavtosh Sharma
  • • Snehil Sonam
  • • Anuj Chauhan
  • • Gopal Jha
  • • Sarvesh Singh Baghel
  • • Rajesh Tyagi
  • • Harsh Khanna
  • • Harish Pandey
  • • Amit Tanwar
  • • Nikhil Jain
  • • R.P. Shukla
  • • Vijay K. Jain
  • • Kamal Mohan Gupta
  • • Abhinav Sharma
  • • H Ms. Sneha Baul
  • • Santosh Kumar - I
  • • S. S. Shamshery
  • • Ms. Rukhmini

Case Synopsis & Summary

Naveen Kaushik v. Central Bureau of Investigation concerns a challenge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, specifically section 19(3)(c). The Supreme Court, in a two‑judge bench consisting of Adarsh Kumar Goel and R. F. Nariman, addresses an appeal from the Delhi High Court’s order in LPA No. 810 of 2010 and related connected matters (Criminal Appeal No. 1393 of 2013 and others). The Court places reliance on a controlling three‑judge bench judgment dated 28 March 2018 in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation. In view of that decision, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. The order disposes of numerous connected appeals and SLPs by allowing withdrawal without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court, detaching several petitions and directing that others be listed independently. The court also directs the parties to appear before the trial court on specified dates. The proceedings reflect a procedural harmonization with the ARRA decision rather than a merits adjudication on PCA charges, ensuring consistent application of the controlling authority while expediting disposition of the matters before the trial court.

Provisions of Law Cited

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.19(3)(c)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Not stated in the document.

Contentions of Respondents

Not stated in the document.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. and Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation[2018] 2 SCR 1045PositiveThree-judge bench decision relied upon to set aside the impugned order and remand for fresh decision in accordance with law.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Naveen Kaushik v. Central Bureau of Investigation and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

1108 SUPREME COURT REPORTS[2018] 2 S.C.R. 1108 [2018] 2 S.C.R. A ## NAVEEN KAUSHIK v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (Criminal Appeal No(s). 1393/2013) APRIL 26, 2018 ## B **[ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.]** _Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.19(3)(c) – Held: In view of three judge Bench judgment dtd. 28[th] March, 2018 passed by Supreme Court in_ Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. and Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation _reported in_ [2018] 2 SCR 1045, _impugned order in Criminal Appeal No.1394/2013 is set aside and the matter is remanded to High Court – Connected appeal Nos._ C _1384, 1386-1387, 1395 and 10050-10051, dismissed – SLP Crl. No. 5678/14 detagged – SLP Crl. No.9363/17 tagged with SLP Crl. No. 6165/2016 – All other connected appeals/special leave petitions allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court._ ## CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal D No. 1393 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 30.03.2011 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in LPA No. 810 of 2010. ## WITH Crl. A. Nos. 1377, 1394, 1382, 1383, 1384, 1386-1387, 1385, 1406, 1396, 1395, 1391, 1389, 1388, 1398, 1397, 1390, 1399, 1402, 1400, 1401, E 1404, 1403, 1405 of 2013 Crl.A. Nos. 388, 234 of 2014 SLP(Crl) Nos. 5678, 1451, 1399, 2508, 2970, 2507, 2939, 2977, 4709, 6372, 6391, 6691-6692 of 2014 SLP(Crl) No. 9363 of 2017 F SLP(Crl) Nos.2610, 6835, 6834, 6837, 10050-10051, 9652-9653 of 2013 Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv., Md. Shahid Anwar, Zulfiquar Ali Khan, Aamir Naseem, M.C. Dhingra, Anuj Chauhan, Sibo Sankar Mishra, M.K. Pandey, Ms. Sutapa Sarangi, Anupam Lal Das, Anirudh Singh, Krishanu Barua, Rishi Malhotra, Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Ajit Kumar Gupta, Ms. G Radhey Shyam Ahuja, Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mohit D. Ram, Alok Shukla, Nihal Ahmad, Kunal Yadav, Ms. Nena Shukla, Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, Yoginder Handoo, Nishant Kumar, Harvinder Singh Bhullar, Ms. Monalisha Chowdhury, Ashwani Kumar, Yogesh Verma, Bhavtosh Sharma, Snehil Sonam, Anuj Chauhan, Gopal Jha, Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Rajesh Tyagi, Harsh Khanna, Harish Pandey, Amit Tanwar, Nikhil Jain, R.P. Shukla, Vijay K. Jain, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Abhinav Sharma, H Ms. Sneha Baul, Santosh Kumar - I, S. S. Shamshery, Ms. Rukhmini 1108 NAVEEN KAUSHIK v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 1109 Bobde, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Ms. Binu Tamta, V.V. Pattabi Ram, Sumit A Teterwal, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, B. V. Balaram Das, Ashok K. Mahajan, Senthil Jagadeesan, Amarjit Singh Bedi, Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Advs. for the appearing parties. The following Order of the Court was delivered: ## **O R D E R** We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the B record. Criminal Appeal No(s).1393 of 2013, Criminal Appeal No(s).1377/2013, 1383/2013, 1399/2013, 1405/ 2013; and SLP(Crl.) NO.6837/2013, C Criminal Appeal No.1382 of 2013, Criminal Appeal No. 1396 of 2013, Criminal Appeal No(s).1389/2013, 1388/2013, 1390/2013 SLP(Crl.) No.2610/2013, Crl.Appeal No(s).1398/2013; D SLP (Crl.) No(s). 6835/2013, 6834/2013, Criminal Appeal No(s). 1397/2013, 1402/2013, 1401/2013, 1404/ 2013, 1403/2013, - SLP(Crl.) No(s). 9652 53/2013, 1451/2014, 1399/2014, 2508/2014, 2970/2014, 2507/2014, 6372/2014, 6391/2014, D E Criminal Appeal No(s). 1400/2013 Criminal Appeal No(s). 388/2014, SLP (Crl.) No(s).2939/2014, 2977/2014, 4709/2014, 6691-6692/ 2014, The appeals and the special leave petition are allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law. F The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 21[st] May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date. ## **Criminal Appeal No. 1394/2013 :** In view of judgment of this Court dated 28[th] March, 2018 in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. And Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1375-1376 of 2013, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. G The appeal is accordingly disposed of. The parties are directed to appear before the High Court on Monday, the 28[th] May, 2018. H 1110 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 2 S.C.R. ## A **Criminal Appeal No. 1384 of 2013:** The appeal is dismissed as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the appellant(s). The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 21[st] May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date. ## B ## **Criminal Appeal No. 1385 of 2013:** The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 15[th] May, 2018. ## **Criminal Appeal No. 1406 of 2013,** ## C **Criminal Appeal No. 1391 of 2013:** The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 10[th] July, 2018. ## D ## **Criminal Appeal No(s). 234/2014:** The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 19[th] May, 2018. ## **- Criminal Appeal No. 1386 1387 of 2013,** ## E **Criminal Appeal No. 1395 of 2013, SLP (Crl.) No(s). 10050-10051/2013:** We do not find any merit in these appeals and the special leave petitions which are hereby dismissed. The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 21[st] May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date. ## F We further direct that in all the matters, mentioned above, record be sent to the trial court so that the trial court may proceed with the matters pending before it. ## **SLP(Crl.) No(s). 5678/2014:** ## G The special leave petition is wrongly tagged with Crl.A.NO(s).1386-1387/2013. Accordingly, the special leave petition is detagged and may be listed independently. ## **SLP(Crl.) No. 9363/2017:** Tag to SLP(Crl.)NO.6165 of 2016. H Divya Pandey Matters disposed of.