High CourtSingle JudgeI.A.s dismissed; Contempt Petitions adjourned.

NARP AT SINGH v. RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Case / Petition Number:Civil Appeal No. 2181-2182 of 2001

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Judgment Date
2007-05-03
Court Decision / Holding
I.A. Nos. 15-16 dismissed; Contempt Petitions adjourned; matter to be listed after six months.
Final Disposition
I.A.s dismissed; Contempt Petitions adjourned.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • NARP AT SINGH

Respondents

  • RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Case Synopsis & Summary

This document concerns a post-judgment procedural matter in the appeal Narp At Singh v. Rajasthan Financial Corporation, culminating in I.A. Nos. 15-16 for clarification of this Court’s order dated May 3, 2007. The applicant sought directives in relation to the contempt petitions (C.P. Nos. 151-152 of 2007) and the underlying Civil Appeal Nos. 2181-2182 of 2001. The court reiterates long-standing principles governing interlocutory applications filed after a case has reached final disposal: ordinarily, an I.A. is maintainable only while proceedings are pending, and once a case is finally disposed of, the court becomes functus officio, allowing corrections only for clerical or inadvertent mistakes. In the present situation, the I.A.s are deemed misconceived and not maintainable. Consequently, the court dismisses I.A. Nos. 15-16. The contempt petitions, thereafter, are adjourned. The order directs that the Contempt Petitions (C) Nos. 151-152 of 2007 in Civil Appeal No. 2181-2182 of 2001 be listed six months hence for such further proceedings as the Court may deem appropriate. The ruling evidences the Court’s restraining approach to belated procedural applications and underscores the need to confine proceedings within the stage already reached in the appellate process, permitting only clerical corrections if necessary. The outcome is a procedural disposition, not an adjudication on merits of the contempt petitions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against NARP AT SINGH v. RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# NARP AT SINGH _v._ RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL 289 # CORPORATION. -~- I.A. No. 15-16 for clarification and direction of Court's Order dated A 3.5.2007 are totally misconceived. Moreover, ordinarily nos. I.A. lies after a case is finally disposed of. Ordinarily, an I.A. is maintainable only in a pending case. Once a case is finally disposed of the Court becomes funcyus officio, and thereafter an I.A. lies ordinarily only for correcting clerical or , accidental mistakes. The same are accordingly, dismissed. . B B Put up the Contempt Petitions (C) No. 151 -152 of2007 in Civil Appeal No. 2181-2182 of 2001 after six months. RP. I.As. dismissed and Contempt Petition adjourned. c