Nandakumaran K. and others v Union of India and others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Murali Purushothaman
- Judgment Date
- 2023-08-24
- Court Decision / Holding
- This writ petition is disposed of directing the competent among the respondents to re-consider the petitioners' claims in the light of the dictum laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in EPF Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B and Others (2022) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- NANDAKUMARAN K., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.K.K.SIVARAMAN MENON, SREEVALSAM, S.CHITTOOR, COCHIN, ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THRIPUNITHURA, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00078850, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/167.
- A.K.SUBRAMANIAM, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.KUNJIPENGAN, AINIKKATTIL HOUSE, NELLAI P.O., MANAGER (RETIRED), WAREHOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, CHALAKUDY, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00080783, PF A/CNO.KR/TVM/10416/202.
- SASIDHARAN NAIR, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.GOPLA PILLAI, MOOTHEDATH HOUSE, PARIYARAM P.O., PUTHUPALLY HELPER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THIRUVALLA, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00070907, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/158.
- N.PRABHARAN NAIR, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.NANU NAIR, KALATHIVILA PADINJARU, SOORNADU NORTH P.O., TYPIST (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THIRUVALLA, PPO NO.KR/KLM/00090028, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/297.
- RAMAKRISHNAN P.K., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.N.KUNJAN, KRISHNA, JANAKI NAGAR, MUTTIKULANGARA P.O., ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, PALAKKAD, PPO NO.KR/KLM/00056061, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/243.
- NALINI V., AGED 64 YEARS D/O.VELAYUDHAN, ERAPPAKODU HOUSE, KUNNATHUR MEDU P.O., HELPER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, PALAKKAD, PPO NO.KR/KLM/00053240, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/110.
- K.R.SURESH BABU, AGED 63 YEARS S/O.K.V.RAMAKRISHNAN,KOZHIKATTIL HOUSE, ASWATHY, PAMBOOR,KUTTOOR P.O., HELPER (RETIRED) WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THRISSUR, PPO NO.KR/KLM/00086869, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/108.
- SUBRAMANIAN M., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.MARIYAPPA PILLAI, SARANYA SADAN, CHULLIMADA P.O., LABELING ASSISTANT (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THRISSUR, PPO NO.KR/KLM/00051636, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/327.
- M.NOORUDEEN, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.MEERAMOUTHI, BUDHANIKKUNNIL HOUSE, PATHANAMTHITTA, MANAGER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THRISSUR, PPO NO.KR/KLM/00072137, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/156.
- SHAJI P.R., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.PANKAJAKSHAN, AMRITHANJALI, TC 95/2641, KIZHAKATTIL, ANAYARA P.O., ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, NEDUMANGAD, PPO NO.KR/TVM/00071424, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/227.
- B.NABAB KHAN, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.BABUJI KHAN, TC 24/2198,YGRA-74, PANDIT COLONY ROAD, KAWDIAR P.O.,HELPER (RETIRED), PAZHAVANGADI, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION,NEDUMANGAD, PPO NO.KR/TVM/00071910, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/213.
- K.P.HANEEFA, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.K.K.PAREED, KUTTOTH HOUSE, PARAMBAYAM, NEDUMBASERY P.O., ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, NEDUMANGAD, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00082350, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/302.
- V.M.SREEDEVI, AGED 63 YEARS D/O.VASUDEVAN, PRASANNA BHAVAN, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., ACCOUNTANT (RETIRED),HEAD OFFICE, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PPO NO.KR/TVM/00072759, PF A/CNO.KR/TVM/10416/20.
- MANIYAN K., AGED 63 YEARS S/O.KUMARAVELU, MANIVEENA, 4/94, MELATHUMELA,MANIKANTESWARAM P.O., UD CLERK (RETIRED), KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PPO NO.KR/KCH/000708881, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/187.
- PREMACHITH N., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN K., TC 37/1537(1), (TRA-439-A), VAISHNAVAM, VATTIYURKAVU P.O., DRIVER (RETIRED), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHURAM, PPO NO.KR/TVM/00071782, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/43.
- AVASANTHA, AGED 64 YEARS D/O.K.ARJUNAN, KADIYARA VEDU, KADAKAVUR P.O., TYPIST (RETIRED) WARE HOUSE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, ATTINGAL, PPO NO.KR/TVM/00072499, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/374.
- K.S.PIUS, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.K.K.SAVIOUR, KURAPARAMBIL, THONAKADU P.O., CHENGANOOR, HELPER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, ATTINGAL, PPO NO.KR/TVM/00092267, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/375.
- THANKAPPAN P.N., AGED 63 YEARS S/O.KUMARAN, PANACHICKAL HOUSE, KALIYAR P.O., VANNAPURAM SHOP IN CHARGE (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, PTHANIKADU, PPO NO.KR/KTM/00031347, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/211.
- MARYAMMA KURUVILA, AGED 64 YEARS D/O.KURUVILLA, EATTATHOTTU HOUSE, OLAMATTAM, THODUPUZHA P.O., ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETIRED) WARE HOUSE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THODUPUZHA, PPO NO.KR/KTM/00043860, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/236.
- P.H.SANTHOSH, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.HARIHARAN, LAKSHMI, ALAPUZHA NORTH P.O., ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETIRED), WARE HOUSE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, ALAPUZHA, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00079978, PF A/CNO.KR/TVM/10416/117.
- RAVIKUMAR K., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.K.N.KUMARAN, KATTUNGAL HOUSE, THUMBOLI P.O., ALAPUZHA, HELPER (RETIRED) P1 1 SHOP, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, NEDUMUDI, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00083039, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/186.
- SUBHARANI, AGED 64 YEARS D/O.UNNIKRISHNAN, SAVITHRAM, PUNNAPRA P.O., ACCOUNTANT (RETIRED) WARE HOUSE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THIRUVALLA, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00081453, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/241.
- RAMDAS V.K., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.GOVINDAN P.K., SREE SIVASAKTHI, KAVUMBHAGAM P.O., THALASSERY, REGIONAL MANAGER (RETIRED), KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THRISSUR, PPO NO.KR/KNR/00045777, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/5.
- GOPI O.M., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, ONNAYIL HOUSE, KARIAMBADI P.O., MEENANGADI, HELPER (RETIRED), KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, THRISUR, PPO NO.KR/KKD/00052529, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/10416/265.
Respondents
- UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI- 110 001.
- REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, PATTAM PALACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), C.M.S.COLLEGE ROAD, P.B.NO.36, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1895, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.
- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), IIND FLOOR, DELMA COMPLEX, ROUND NORTH, THRISSUR - 680 001.
- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), P.B.NO.1806, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 006.
- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), PONNAMMA CHAMBERS, PARAMESWAR NAGAR, KOLLAM - 691 001.
- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), P.B.NO.117, FORT BUILDING, V.K.COMPLEX, KANNUR - 670 001.
- KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LIMITED (KSBC), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BEVCO TOWERS, NEAR MUSCOT HOTEL, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • C.S.AJITH PRAKASH
- • SRI.T.K.DEVARAJAN
- • SMT.T.N.SREEKALA
- • SRI.PAUL C.THOMAS
- • SRI.M.B.SOORI
- • SRI.JAISON JOSEPH(KOOTHATTUKULAM)
- • SHRI.BABU M.
Counsels for Respondents
- • SRI.S.MANU, DSGI
- • SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN, CGC
- • SMT.NITA.N.S.
- • SRI.NAVEEN.T., SC, KERALA STATE BEV.CO. M. AND M.
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition (WP(C) No.2654 of 2020) before the Kerala High Court seeks pension contributions under the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) Pension Scheme, 1995 to be computed on the actual salary drawn by the petitioners rather than the maximum pensionable salary fixed under para 11(3). The petitioners, all retired KSBC employees, contend that pension benefits must be calculated based on actual earnings, and pray for a mandamus directing the 2nd and 9th respondents (EPFO) to collect contributions accordingly from the date of joining the pension scheme, and to resolve disputes so that pension is granted on the basis of actual salary. The respondents’ counsel submits that the issue has been settled by the Supreme Court in EPF Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B and Others (2022), and that relief should be exercised in light of that decision. The court notes the Supreme Court dictum and disposes the petition by directing competent respondents to re-consider the petitioners’ claims in the light of that decision within three months from receipt of a copy of this judgment. The order is a targeted remedy to ensure pension calculations align with actual salary, grounded in the EPF Act, the Pension Scheme, and the cited Supreme Court authority. The judgment is delivered by a Single Judge, Justice Murali Purushothaman.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Mandamus as a remedy
- Pension contributions to be calculated on actual salary (principle re real earnings basis)
- Binding effect of Supreme Court decisions (Sunil Kumar B. dictum)
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners contend that the EPF pension scheme must be applied to pay pension based on actual salary drawn, not the capped maximum, under para 11(3). They seek a mandamus to compel the 2nd and 9th respondents to collect pension contributions on the basis of actual earnings from the date of joining the pension scheme and to resolve disputes so that pension is calculated accordingly. They rely on the EPF Act, 1952 and the Pension Scheme provisions to justify higher pension upon actual salary and to claim arrears where applicable.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents' counsel submits that the matter has been settled by the Supreme Court in EPF Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B and Others (2022), and that the petition should be resolved in light of that decision. They advocate reconsideration of claims only as directed by the Supreme Court dictum and within the court's timeline, arguing that the relief sought by the petitioners must conform to the pronouncements in Sunil Kumar B.
Cited Precedents (5)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPF Organisation and Another v. Sunil Kumar B and Others | 2022 SCC Online SC 1521 | Positive | Court relies on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Sunil Kumar B to frame the reconsideration of pension claims, making the decision persuasive authority and guiding the disposition. |
| Apex Court in SLP No.7074/2014 & Other Connected Cases | SLP No.7074/2014 | Mentioned Only | Exhibited as a Supreme Court judgment but not explicitly invoked in the reasoning or directions; referenced as part of the appendix. |
| Judgment dated 4/11/2011 in WPC No.6643/2007 | WPC No.6643/2007 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P25 cites a prior HC judgment; not discussed or applied in the reasoning of the present judgment. |
| Judgment in W.A. No.568/2012 & Other Connected Cases | W.A.No.568/2012 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P26 references a related appellate decision; not analyzed within the current judgment. |
| Judgment of the Apex Court in SLP No.35038/2016 (and connected cases?) | SLP 2016/35038 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P28 cites a Supreme Court judgment; used for context but not directly elaborated in the court’s reasoning. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Nandakumaran K. and others v Union of India and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.