High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions to the Land Tribuna...

Murukan.M.R and Sivasankaran v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) Mini Civil Station, Ottappalam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-16
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.11/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017) and to give priority to senior-citizen cases as per the Court’s directions, with expeditious disposal. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to the Land Tribunal Pattambi to dispose of S.M. No.11/2021 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, prioritizing senior citizens where appropriate; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • MURUKAN.M.R
  • SIVASANKARAN

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR) Mini Civil Station, Ottappalam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. SMT.JESSY S.SALIM

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT VIDHYA A.C - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition (Article 226) by two senior citizens, Murukan M.R. (70) and Sivasankaran (78), seeks a mandamus to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR) Ottappalam to expeditiously conduct an enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.11/2021 at the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act (Section 72) and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The background notes that the Land Tribunal initiated suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The petition references Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, which emphasizes expeditious disposal, seniority-based disposal, and prioritization of senior citizens, potentially via Village Officers to speed up reporting. The Government Pleader highlights the high pendency (over 11,000 cases) and advocates using Village Officers to obtain reports to streamline proceedings while complying with statutory norms. The Court endorses Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.11/2021 strictly in accordance with law and those directions, with priority to senior citizens where appropriate, and without cost consequences.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners, two senior citizens aged 70 and 78, approached this Court under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.11/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, for assignment of the landlord’s vested rights under the Kerala Land Reforms Act and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. They contend that expeditious disposal is essential to enable them to approach banks for loans and purchase, and rely on this Court’s guidance in Narayanan Namboodiri for prioritizing senior citizens and disposing cases on seniority within specified timeframes, while permitting reports to be obtained through Village Officers to avoid delays. respondents: The respondents contend that while expeditious disposal is desirable, it must adhere to statutory frameworks and seniority-based sequencing. The Government Pleader notes a large pendency (over 11,000 suo motu cases) and supports efficient processing via Village Officers for obtaining necessary reports, arguing that cases should be resolved in line with the established rules and directions, including prioritizing senior-citizen matters only as sanctioned by law and higher authorities.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent authorities emphasize adherence to statutory procedures and prioritization consistent with law, citing the pervasive pendency and the need to obtain reports via Village Officers to expedite processing, while ensuring due process for all parties.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe judgment explicitly relies on and applies the Narayanan Namboodiri directions for expeditious disposal and priority to senior citizens, directing the Land Tribunal to follow those directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Murukan.M.R and Sivasankaran v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) Mini Civil Station, Ottappalam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 27TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **1 MURUKAN.M.R, AGED 70 YEARS S/O RAMAKRISHNAN EZHUTHACHAN, MELEVEEDU, ROSILY COTTAGE P O, KOTTAYI, PIN-678572, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 SIVASANKARAN, AGED 78 YEARS S/O RAMAKRISHNAN EZHUTHACHAN, MELEVEEDU, ROSILY COTTAGE, P O, KOTTAYI, PIN-678572, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SMT.JESSY S.SALIM** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LR) MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPPALAM, PIN-679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.3780 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.582/4 in Block No.1 of Kottayi-I Village of Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land ## WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) -5- Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) -6- not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kottayi-I, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.11/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 06.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioners would point out that the petitioners are senior citizens aged 70 years and 78 years respectively. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.11/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.11/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- WP(C).No.3912 OF 2021(L) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 06.01.2021.**