High CourtSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed; Land Tribunal directed ...

Muneer v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirur, Malappuram District

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6723 of 2021(M)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-16
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.198/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M.No.198/2021 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and the court’s order; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • MUNEER

Respondents

  • LAND TRIBUNAL, (LAND REFORMS), Tirur, Malappuram District-679101
  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, Tirur, Malappuram District-679101

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT Rekha C. Nair, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the delay in expeditious disposal of a suo motu land reform proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Sections 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, in respect of 2.833 Ares of land (Re-Sy.No.362/12-7, Tirur). The petitioner, Muneer, seeks a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M. No.198/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Tirur. The court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, dated 14.03.2018), which emphasized that disposal must follow seniority and that cases of senior citizens deserve priority, while avoiding out-of-turn processing that would derail the system. It laid down specific directions for expeditious disposal: obtain reports through Village Officers if needed; dispose senior-citizen cases within six months; dispose others on seniority within 18 months; and ensure notices can be issued flexibly, without breaking seniority unless directed by the Court. The present case is to be decided strictly in accordance with those directions, considering the overall pendency and the need for compliance with the established framework, while noting that the Land Tribunal’s suo motu action seeks to advance the process.”

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for expeditious enquiry into S.M.No.198/2021 and disposal of the matter in the Land Tribunal, Tirur, arguing for mandamus relief to ensure expeditious action. They rely on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision, which mandates disposal of senior citizen cases on priority and within specified timeframes, and urges adherence to seniority without derailment of the process.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents highlight the substantial pendency of suo motu proceedings (thousands overall) and advocate following the framework laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri to preserve seniority, while leveraging reports through Village Officers (as permitted by government orders) to expedite the process; they emphasize compliance with statutory procedures and avoid disruption of the established queue.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited and applied as precedent; the Court adopts the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure expeditious disposal based on seniority and related time-frame guidance.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Muneer v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirur, Malappuram District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MUNEER, AGED 42 YEARS S/O. KUNHAHAMMED, KUNNATH PARAMBIKOTT HOUSE, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**LAND TRIBUNAL,**| |---|---| ||**(LAND REFORMS), TIRUR, TIRUR P.O.,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 101.**| |**2**|**SPECIAL TAHSILDAR**| ||**(LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR,**| ||**TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 101.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT REKHA C.NAIR- SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.198/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 02.833 Ares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.362/12-7 of Tirur Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the ## W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Tirur Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.198/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 certificate dated 04.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.198/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.198/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6723 OF 2021(M) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.F 2009 S.R. DATED 4.2.2021 IN S.M.NO.198/2021 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.**