High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions to di...

Muhammedkutty K. v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Pattambi and Vallappuzha Village Officer

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-08
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.469/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to dispose of S.M.469/2020 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri guidelines; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Muhammedkutty K.

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Office of the Special Tahasildar (LR), Pattambi
  • Village Officer, Vallappuzha Village Office, Vallappuzha Post, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. R. Sreehari

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the inaction of the first respondent, the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi, in expeditiously disposing of S.M. No.469/2020, initiated suo motu by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The proceedings seek assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14. The petitioner, a 67-year-old senior citizen, contends that delay frustrates his ability to access loan facilities through the purchase certificate and seeks a time-bound disposal. The Government Pleader counters the Court’s observation that there is substantial pendency—over 11,000 suo motu cases in Pattambi—and emphasizes due process. The Court recalls its decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and others, W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, which laid down directions for expeditious disposal prioritizing senior citizens and preserving seniority while obtaining necessary reports via Village Officers. Citing this precedent, the Court directs the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.469/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, and ends without any order on costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14, Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority of cases to be maintained; disposal on seniority basis
  • Expeditious disposal of senior-citizen cases
  • Priority to senior citizens in land tribunal proceedings

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal for S.M.No.469/2020 should be expeditiously disposed of, given the petitioner’s age and the practical need to obtain a loan against the land purchase certificate. He relies on judicial directions emphasizing seniority and prompt disposal of cases involving purchase certificates, and seeks a mandamus directing prompt action within a time frame fixed by the Court.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents highlight the substantial pendency (over 11,000 suo motu matters) and the necessity to follow due process. They acknowledge the need for speed in adjudication but stress adherence to established procedures and prior pronouncements, including the Narayanan Namboodiri guidelines, to ensure orderly and fair disposal rather than ad hoc prioritization.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited as the controlling precedent that laid down directions for expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and for maintaining seniority, which the Court followed in directing disposal of the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Muhammedkutty K. v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Pattambi and Vallappuzha Village Officer and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MUHAMMEDKUTTY K., AGED 67 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED, KARAMPATTA VARIYATHODI, CHOORAKKODE POST, VALLAPUZHA, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336.** **BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS),**| |---|---| ||**OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR (L.R),**| ||**PATTAMBI AT MINI CIVIL STATION,**| ||**OTTAPALAM-679104.**| |**2**|**VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**VALLAPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, VALLAPUZHA POST,**| ||**PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **VIDYA AC GP** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.469/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.2700 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.5/1 in Block No.34 and 0.1011 Hectares of land in Re.Sy.No.2 in Block No.35 of Vallappuzha Village in Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Vallappuzha Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.469/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 29.05.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 67 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.469/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.469/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5990 OF 2021(W) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 29.05.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P2 AADHAAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER (PHOTO COPY).** **EXHIBIT P3 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C)NO.28398/2017 ETC. DATED 14.03.2018 OF THIS COURT.** **EXHIBIT P4 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C)NO.1134/2021 DATED 18TH JANUARY, 2021 OF THIS COURT.**