High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed; Land Tribunal to dispos...

Muhammed Kunheen v. The Special Tahasildar (LR) – Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi and The Village Officer, Parappur Village

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-04-09
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of. The Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, is directed to dispose of S.M.No.160/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (paragraph 2), and in line with the GO 2018 order; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.160/2021 following Narayanan Namboodiri directions; No costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Muhammed Kunheen

Respondents

  • The Special Tahasildar (LR) – Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi
  • The Village Officer, Parappur Village

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. P.T. Sheejish

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C Vidya

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 0.0344 hectares in Re-Sy.No.250/4, Parappur Village, Malappuram District. The petitioner, Muhammed Kunheen, seeks a mandamus to compel the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.160/2021 on the Land Tribunal’s file, within a time frame fixed by the Court. The petition relies on a 2018 decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, which emphasized expeditious disposal of cases, prioritized senior citizens, and required Land Tribunals to dispose matters in seniority order, with flexibility to obtain reports through Village Officers to expedite proceedings. The Government Pleader points to heavy pendency (over 2,100 cases) and urges adherence to established procedures, including seniority. The Court ultimately directs disposal of S.M.No.160/2021 strictly in accordance with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, within the law, and dismisses the petition with no order on costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 99G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by the Land Tribunal on seniority basis.
  • Do not break the seniority of cases except by directions from a court or higher authority.
  • Utilize Village Officers to obtain reports to expedite disposal.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to require the Special Tahasildar (LR) and the Land Tribunal to decide S.M.No.160/2021 promptly, arguing that expeditious disposal is essential for timely grant of purchase certificates and for loan purposes, as highlighted by the Narayanan Namboodiri decision. It asserts that the Land Tribunal should adhere to the seniority-based framework and utilize village-level reporting to avoid delays, as guided by the 2018 Government order embedded in the judgment.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize the substantial pendency before the Land Tribunal (2,192 cases) and contend that disposal must follow the established seniority and legal procedures. The Government Pleader notes that priority may be given to senior citizens and that sudden deviations from the queue would disrupt proceedings, though the Government accepts aiming for expeditious disposal within the procedural framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe court relies on this decision for directions on expeditious disposal and seniority-based handling of Land Tribunal cases, and directs adherence to its framework as part of the present judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Muhammed Kunheen v. The Special Tahasildar (LR) – Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi and The Village Officer, Parappur Village and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MUHAMMED KUNHEEN, AGED 34 YEARS S/O MOHAMMED @ BAPUTTY MUSLIAR, CHOLAKKALAKATH HOUSE, PARAPPUR P.O, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676306.** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE SPECIAL THAHASILDAR (LR)**| |---|---| ||**LAND TRIBUNAL-TIRURANGADI,**| ||**TIRURANGADI P.O,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA-676306.**| |**2**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER**| ||**PARAPPUR VILLAGE,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-676311.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.160/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0344 Hectares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.250/4 of Parappur Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Parappur Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.160/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P2 certificate dated 04.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi is 2192. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi can be directed to dispose of W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -7- S.M.No.160/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.160/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.9718 OF 2021(L) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.** **EXHIBIT P2** **THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SUOMOTO PROCEEDINGS DATED 04.02.2021.**