High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; No order as to costs.

Muhammed Haji v. The Tahsildar/Land Tribunal, Tirur, Malappuram District

Case / Petition Number:W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-15
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of; the Land Tribunal, Tirur, is directed to dispose of S.M. No.180/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases).
Final Disposition
Disposed of; No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Muhammed Haji

Respondents

  • The Tahsildar/Land Tribunal, Taluk Office, Tirur, Malappuram District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. K.P. Shereef

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT Vidya A.C- Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Muhammed Haji, a 70-year-old petitioner, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.180/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, Malappuram district. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for the assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner contends that the belated disposal would prejudice him, particularly since he may need a loan for construction/land purchase. The Government Pleader points to a large pendency (4,987) of suo motu proceedings in Tirur. The decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases) is relied upon to emphasize seniority in disposal, to enable village officers to supply reports and to protect senior citizens' rights. The Court directs disposal of the matter in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri's directions and to follow the law, without priority out of turn. The writ petition is disposed of with no cost order.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vestings and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vestings and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14G.O.(P). No. 09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 99

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner, a 70-year-old senior citizen, seeks a mandamus directing expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.180/2021 on the Land Tribunal's file. He asserts that the delay in disposal prejudices him because he may require the purchase certificate to obtain a bank loan and to secure relief under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. He relies on the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases) which directs expeditious disposal with priority to senior citizens and adherence to seniority, including obtaining reports through Village Officers where necessary. He prays that the Land Tribunal dispose of the suo motu matter in accordance with those directions and applicable law.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent Government Pleader contends that the Land Tribunal faces heavy pendency (4,987 ongoing suo motu proceedings) and must follow the seniority principle as laid down previously. It points to the GO 2018 order to utilize Village Officers to obtain information and to expedite cases, particularly senior citizens, and argues that the court should not countenance out-of-turn disposal. The respondents submit that disposal should be in strict adherence to law and to the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as the controlling authority directing expeditious disposal and adherence to seniority, including use of Village Officers for reports, and forming the basis for the directions in the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Muhammed Haji v. The Tahsildar/Land Tribunal, Tirur, Malappuram District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MUHAMMED HAJI, AGED 70 YEARS S/O. MOIDEEN HAJI, CHERUPULLIYIL HOUSE, ALINKAL, TRIPRANGODE P.O, TIUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 108** **BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SHEREEF** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **THE TAHSILDAR/LAND TRIBUNAL, TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 101** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Tahasildar to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.180/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 1.61 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.146/3-8 of Thriprangode Village in Tirur Taluk, Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thriprangode, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.180/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 07.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 70 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.180/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M. No.180/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.3772 OF 2021(V) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S TITLE DEED NUMBER 2621/2020 OF SRO, KODAKKAL DATED 4-11-2020** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF THRIPRANGODE VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 7-12021** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE SUO MOTO REPORT NUMBER 9/2021 DATED 7/1/2021 OF THRIPRANGODE VILLAGE OFFICER.**