High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; Land Tribunal Palakkad to dispose ...

M.SATHYADAS v. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), PALAKKAD

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-03
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.187/2019 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; Land Tribunal Palakkad to dispose of S.M.No.187/2019 following Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • M. SATHYADAS, AGED 51 YEARS S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, MANAGING PARTNER, S.A.HOMES, MADHAVA BUILDING, KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

Respondents

  • The Deputy Collector (LR), Palakkad, Office of the Deputy Collector (LR) Palakkad, Collectorate, Palakkad District, PIN-678001

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI. RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY (Advocate)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT VIDHYA A.C (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, M. Sathyadas, a managing partner of S.A. Homes, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Deputy Collector (LR), Palakkad, to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.187/2019 pending before the Land Tribunal, Palakkad. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 0.1912 hectares in Re.Sy.No.959, Palakkad-II. The petitioner relied on a line of precedent, particularly Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others, where this Court directed expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal applications and emphasized seniority-based disposal, especially prioritizing senior citizens. The court underscored directions from Narayanan Namboodiri and acknowledged Government GO directives to expedite such cases. Ultimately, the High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.187/2019 strictly in accordance with law and following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs. The result reaffirms the principle that cases must be resolved in seniority, with expeditious processing, through proper procedural channels.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India, Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority-based disposal of Land Tribunal cases
  • Expeditious disposal of cases, especially those filed by senior citizens
  • Do not break the seniority of cases unless directed by this Court or higher authorities

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct expeditious consideration and disposal of S.M.No.187/2019 on file with the Land Tribunal, asserting that delay undermines the statutory process for vesting and purchase of land under the Kerala Land Reforms Act and Rules. He relies on Narayanan Namboodiri to argue for adherence to seniority and expeditious disposal, and for cooperation with village officers to facilitate reports and notices.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent State/authorities contend that case disposal must follow the seniority queue and that the Land Tribunal should not be diverted from the established process; reference to GO 2018 directives and the need to expedite senior citizens’ cases is acknowledged, with emphasis on not breaking seniority and ensuring proper notices and reports.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited as the controlling precedent establishing expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions for Land Tribunal proceedings; the present judgment directs adherence to these directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against M.SATHYADAS v. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), PALAKKAD and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 14TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **M.SATHYADAS, AGED 51 YEARS S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, MANAGING PARTNER, S.A.HOMES, MADHAVA BUILDING, KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), PALAKKAD, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR) PALAKKAD, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678001.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT VIDHYA A.C-GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.187/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.1912 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.959 in Block No.24 of Palakkad-II Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Pallakkad-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.187/2019, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 28.03.2019, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.187/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.187/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.03.2019 SHOWING THE SUO MOTO NO.187/2019 ISSUED FROM THE RESPONDENT.**