High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition dismissed; liberty to file appeal...

M/S Poothokaren Agencies v. Deputy Commissioner State Tax, State GST Department, Special Circle, Tax Complex, Poothole P.O., Thrissur; Superintendent, Central Tax & Central Excise, Thrissur Range; State Tax Officer, Tax Payer Service Circle, Thrissur City; Goods and Services Tax Council; Union of India; State of Kerala, Taxes (B) Department

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No. 41216 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh
Judgment Date
2023-12-18
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner admitted to wrongly availing SGST transitional credit; SGST usage against due CGST credit was sanctioned by the Central GST Department. The petitioner is allowed to file an appeal within fifteen days from the date of judgment, and the appellate authority shall consider the appeal on merit without being influenced by observations in this order.
Final Disposition
Writ petition dismissed; liberty to file appeal within fifteen days; appellate authority to decide on merit; observations shall not influence the appeal.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • M/S Poothokaren Agencies

Respondents

  • Deputy Commissioner State Tax, State GST Department, Special Circle, Tax Complex, Poothole P.O., Thrissur District
  • Superintendent, Central Tax & Central Excise, Thrissur Range
  • State Tax Officer, Tax Payer Service Circle, Thrissur City, State GST Department, Tax Complex, Poothole P.O., Thrissur District
  • Goods and Services Tax Council
  • Union of India
  • State of Kerala, Taxes (B) Department, State Goods & Service Tax Department, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. K. J. Abraham
  • • Sri. Aravindakshan K.R.
  • • Sri. Nikhil John

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri. P. R. Sreejith - SC
  • • Smt. Reshmit a Ramachandran - GP

Case Synopsis & Summary

Poothokaren Agencies, a registered dealer under the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, filed Form GST TRAN-1 and availed SGST transitional credit of Rs. 7,89,384. Verification revealed ineligibility for the SGST credit, prompting a Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) of the SGST Act, 2017 with Form DRC-01. A detailed order (Exhibit P-10) confirmed Rs. 7,89,384 as SGST liability for wrongfully availed transitional credit, along with interest of Rs. 8,44,360 and a penalty of Rs. 78,938, and advised appeal under Section 107. The petitioner admitted erroneous SGST utilization and argued that, since CGST for the same amount was sanctioned, there should be an adjustment between CGST and SGST departments. The respondents contended that the petitioner had revised Form TRAN-01 to claim CGST transitional credit for the same amount and that liability for interest and penalty remains. The High Court held there was no merit in directing adjustment, noting SGST utilization was sanctioned by the Central GST Department, and dismissed the writ petition, while permitting an appeal within fifteen days, to be decided on merit without influence from observations in this order.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226, Constitution of IndiaCGST/SGST Act, 2017Section 140, CGST/SGST Act, 2017Section 73(1), SGST Act, 2017Section 73(5), SGST Act, 2017Section 107, CGST/SGST Act, 2017

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Principle of natural justice

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that since CGST for the transitional credit amount has already been sanctioned, the SGST credit wrongly availed should be adjusted against the CGST liability. He seeks a writ of certiorari to quash the orders (Exhibits P10 and P11) and directs for adjustment of SGST credit, claiming violation of natural justice and seeking relief under Article 226. He also requests waiving translation and costs.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents maintain that the petitioner had revised Form TRAN-01 claiming CGST transitional credit for the same amount; SGST credit was wrongly availed, so interest and penalty are due. The petition is without merit; remedy lies in an appeal under Section 107; the department should enforce the liability as assessed.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against M/S Poothokaren Agencies v. Deputy Commissioner State Tax, State GST Department, Special Circle, Tax Complex, Poothole P.O., Thrissur; Superintendent, Central Tax & Central Excise, Thrissur Range; State Tax Officer, Tax Payer Service Circle, Thrissur City; Goods and Services Tax Council; Union of India; State of Kerala, Taxes (B) Department and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH MONDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` M/S. POOTHOKAREN AGENCIES, TC/34/108/1, POST OFFICE ROAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, PAUL GEORGE, S/O.GEORGE, POOTHOKAREN HOUSE, ARANATTUKARA P. O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680001 ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI. K. J. ABRAHAM SRI. ARAVINDAKSHAN K.R. SRI. NIKHIL JOHN ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - `1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER STATE TAX, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, SPECIAL CIRCLE, TAX COMPLEX, POOTHOLE P. O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680004.` - `2 SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL TAX & CENTRAL EXCISE, THRISSUR RANGE, SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680001.` - `3 STATE TAX OFFICER, TAX PAYER SERVICE CIRCLE, THRISSUR CITY, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TAX COMPLEX, POOTHOLE P. O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680004.` - `4 THE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL, 5TH FLOOR, TOWER II, JEEVAN BHARATI BUILDING, JANPATH ROAD, CANNAUGHT PLACE,NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, PIN – 110001.` - `5 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110001.` ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 2 ``` ``` 6STATE OF KERALA, TAXES (B) DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PIN – 695001. ``` ``` BY ADV. SRI. P. R. SREEJITH - SC SMT. RESHMITA RAMACHANDRAN - GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 3 ``` # **DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.** -------------------------- ## **W.P.(C) No.41216 of 2023** ------------------------Dated this the 18[th] day of December, 2023 ## **JUDGMENT** ## 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs; i. issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARI or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, quashing Exhibit P10 and P11 orders passed by the 3[rd] respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against the principle of natural justice, or pass such further or other orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case, and render justice; ii. to direct the 4[th] , 5[th] and 6[th] respondents herein to make necessary arrangements to adjust the CGST credit available to the petitioner towards the SGST; iii. to grant such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper; and iv. allow this Writ Petition with cost. v. Issue direction to dispense with the translation of vernacular document produce along with this Writ Petition. ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 4 ``` 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of CGST/SGST Act, 2017. The petitioner is engaged in the business of grinding wheels, abrasive powder, transmission belts, cotton waster with HSN Code 68042110, 68052010, 40103490, 52029900. The petiioner filed Form GST TRAN – 1 as prescribed under Section 140 of CGST/SGST Act, 2017 and availed transitional credit of SGST for an amount of Rs. 7,89,384/-. On verification, it was noticed that the petitioner is not entitled to avail and utilise SGST transitional credit of Rs. 7,89,384/- which was already availed and utilised by him. A Show Cause Notice under Section 73 (1) of the SGST Act, 2017 along with the relevant documents and summary in Form DRC – 01 was issued to the petitioner. A demand was proposed for wrongly availed SGST transitional credit. The petitioner filed reply to the Show Cause Notice but, he did not make any payment against the demand in the Show Cause Notice. Despite several opportunities granted to the petitioner, the petitioner availed the opportunity of personal hearing. 2. The State Tax Officer vide a detailed and well considered order in Exhibit P-10 confirmed Rs. 7,89,384/- as SGST liability for which the petitioner availed the transitional credit wrongly. Levy of interest of ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 5 ``` Rs. 8,44,360/- was also confirmed and penalty of Rs. 78,938/- was also imposed. The petitioner was also informed that the petitioner can file appeal against the order under Section 107 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017. 3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has wrongly availed that SGST transitional credit. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner ought to have avail the CGST for the said amount and as the petitioner did not availed CGST of the said amount, there should be an adjustment between the CGST and SGST departments regarding the SGST credit of Rs. 7,89,384/- utilised by him. 4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner had filed revised Tran – 01 claiming CGST transitional credit for the said amount of Rs. 7,89,384/- for which has been sanctioned. As the petitioner had wrongly availed the SGST, he is liable to pay interest and penalty. The petitioner wants to avoid the payment of interest and penalty and, therefore, he has approached this Court by filing this writ petition. ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 6 ``` 5. I have considered the submissions and facts and circumstances of the case. The petitioner himself has admitted that he had wrongly availed SGST Tran credit for an amount of Rs. 7,89,384/-. As per the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner had also filed revised Tran – 01 and the CGST for the said amount has been sanctioned. Therefore, I find no substance in this writ petition for directing the Department to adjust the amount of Rs. 7,89,384/-. The SGST utilised by the petitioner against the due CGST credit for the said amount is sanctioned by the Central GST Department. Thus, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision in Exhibit P-10, he can file an appeal as advised in Exhibit P-10 order itself, and if such an appeal is filed within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law expeditiously. If the petitioner files the appeal as mentioned above, the appellate authority shall consider the appeal on merit without being influenced by any observations made herein. **Sd/-** **DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE** Svn ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 7 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41216/2023`** ## **`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS`** - `EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRONIC CREDIT LEDGER MAINTAINED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE GST WEB PORTAL FOR THE PERIOD 01.07.2017 TO 30.11.2017` - `EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF FORM GST DRC-01A INTIMATION OF TAX ASCERTAINED AS BEING PAYABLE UNDER SECTION 73(5) SGST ACT DATED 21.01.2021 FOR RS.7,89,384/-ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT` - `EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMARY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE U/S 73 OF THE KSGST/CGST ACT 2017 IN FORM GST DRC-01 DATED 25.11.2021` - `EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE IN REF NO:ZJ3212210001671 WITH SUMMARY IN FORM GST DRC-01 DATED 01.12.2021 FOR RS.7,89,384/-` - `EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE IN CASE ID NO.32AENPP9405K1Z4/2017-18 DATED 12.01.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT` - `EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE REF NO:ZJ32012200038031 DATED 13.01.2022` - `EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ANNEXURE-II IN CIRCULAR NO.182/14/2022-GST REFERENCE NO.21/2023 DATED 03.02.2023` - `EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.32AENPP9405K1Z4/ 2017-18 DATED 17.02.2023 IN DIN: 320220280001951 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT` - `EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE IN FORM GST DRC-06 DATED 04.09.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT` - `EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER U/S. 73 OF THE SGST, 2017 DATED 08.09.2023 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN FORM DRC-07 ALONG WITH SUMMARY OF ORDER AND ANNEXURE` ``` WP(C) NO. 41216 OF 2023 ``` ``` 8 ``` ``` EXHIBIT P11TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER U/S. 73 OF THE SGST, 2017 DATED 08.09.2023 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN FORM DRC-07 ALONG WITH SUMMARY OF ORDER AND ANNEXURE EXHIBIT P12TRUE COPY OF THE NOTE ON TRANSITION PROVISIONS UNDER GST ISSUED BY THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TAXPAYER SERVICES, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS THROUGH THE OFFICIAL WEB PORTAL ```