High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions to the Land Tribuna...

Moideen v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).5353 OF 2021(T)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-02
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.1102/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, and to obtain necessary reports through Village Officers if needed; No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.1102/2021 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and law; No costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Moideen

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (L.R.) Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.R.), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad-679104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • V. A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • A. C. Vidhya (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Moideen, aged 81, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to require expeditious inquiry and disposal of S.M. No.1102/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 0.1375 hectares of land in Re.Sy.No.212/4 of Thirumittacode-I Village. The petitioner contends that, as a senior citizen requiring a bank loan, he needs a purchase certificate promptly and that the delay in disposal affects his life. The Government Pleader notes the overall pendency of suo motu matters (about 11,078). The court relies on Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (L.R.) and the Government Order GO 09/2018/RD to direct expeditious disposal of senior citizen cases and to preserve the seniority of cases. The judgment directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.1102/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, and to obtain necessary reports through Village Officers if needed. The decision emphasizes prioritising senior citizens where possible, maintaining queue integrity, and completing ripe matters within prescribed time frames; the petition is disposed of without costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases
  • Priority to senior citizens in Land Tribunal disposition
  • Seniority of registration should govern disposal; no derailing of the queue

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.1102/2021, arguing the urgency due to his age (81) and the need to obtain a purchase certificate to secure a bank loan. He relies on Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (L.R.) and GO 09/2018/RD to urge expeditious disposal of senior citizen cases and to follow the seniority-based directions. He requests the Land Tribunal to obtain necessary reports (via Village Officers if needed) and to fix a time-frame, so as not to disturb the established seniority of cases.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent highlights the heavy pendency (over 11,000 suo motu cases) and asserts that disposal must be consistent with law and the established seniority system. They emphasize proper service of notices to landlords, adherence to due process, and that GO 2018 guidance should guide but not derail the queue. They argue for balancing expeditious disposal with procedural fairness, ensuring reports and notices are handled within existing structures and that the Land Tribunal follows directions issued by the Court, including those related to senior citizen cases.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relies on Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions; adopts its framework.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Moideen v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5424 OF 2021(C)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MOIDEEN, AGED 81 YEARS S/O KUNJUHIDER, KALATHUMPADIKKAL, THIRUMITTACODE, THIRUMITTACODE-I VILLAGE, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT A.C.VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.1102/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.1375 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.212/4 of Thirumittacode-I Village in Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers ## W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -6- directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thirumittacode-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1102/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 27.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 81 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1102/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.1102/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5353 OF 2021(T) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 27.01.2021.**